Jason Strong - Australian Agricultural CEO, Managing Director and Director

ASAGF Stock  USD 0.95  0.03  3.26%   

CEO

Mr. Jason Hamilton Strong is no longer a Chief Executive Officer, Managing Director of Australian Agricultural Company Limited ., effect on 1 February 2018. He has more than 25 years experience across the beef supply chain, and brings significant industry knowledge, commercial experience and strategic marketing capabilities to AACo. He joined AACo in 2012 from Meat Livestock Australia where he was Regional Manager Europe with responsibility for European and Russian markets. Prior to the MLA stint in Europe he was Head of New Market Development for Pfizer Animal Genetics and Manager of the Meat Standards Australia Grading Services. He was actively involved in broader industry activities as a past Chairman and Director of the Australian Beef Industry Foundation and one of the drivers behind the Intercollegiate Meat Judging program. During the past three years, He has not served as a Director of any other listed company.
Phone61 7 3368 4400
Webhttps://www.aaco.com.au

Australian Agricultural Management Efficiency

The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.0669) % which means that it has lost $0.0669 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.083 %, meaning that it generated $0.083 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Australian Agricultural's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Australian Agricultural manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.
The company has accumulated 375.95 M in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 0.3, which may suggest the company is not taking enough advantage from borrowing. Australian Agricultural has a current ratio of 8.62, suggesting that it is liquid and has the ability to pay its financial obligations in time and when they become due. Debt can assist Australian Agricultural until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Australian Agricultural's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Australian Agricultural sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Australian to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Australian Agricultural's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.

Similar Executives

Found 12 records

CEO Age

Tommy JensenBunge Limited
54
Donald SmithTyson Foods
55
Gregory HeckmanBunge Limited
62
Dean BanksTyson Foods
46
Todd BasteanBunge Limited
50
Soren SchroderBunge Limited
55
Noel WhiteTyson Foods
66
Michael GoettlBunge Limited
50
Brian ThomsenBunge Limited
50
Brian LaneComfort Systems USA
67
Raul PadillaBunge Limited
68
Enrique HumanesBunge Limited
56
Australian Agricultural Company Limited produces and sells cattle and beef in Australia. The company was founded in 1824 and is based in Newstead, Australia. Australian Agricultu operates under Farm Products classification in the United States and is traded on OTC Exchange. Australian Agricultural [ASAGF] is a Pink Sheet which is traded between brokers over the counter.

Management Performance

Australian Agricultural Leadership Team

Elected by the shareholders, the Australian Agricultural's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Australian Agricultural inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Australian. The board's role is to monitor Australian Agricultural's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Australian Agricultural's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Australian Agricultural's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Nigel Simonsz, CFO
Grant, Head of People & Culture
Bruce Bennett, Company Secretary, General Counsel
Neil Reisman, Non-Executive Director
David Crombie, Non-Executive Director
Scott Prebble, Acting CFO
Aaron Wakeley, Head Communications
David Harris, MD, CEO
ACIS AGIA, G Sec
Stuart Black, Non-Executive Director
FitzGibbon, Head of Strategy and Growth
Donald McGauchie, Independent Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
Jason Strong, CEO, Managing Director and Director
Tony McCormack, COO
Jessica Rudd, Non-Executive Director
Anna Speer, COO
Marc Blazer, Non-Executive Director
Michael Johnson, Head Operations
Anthony Abraham, Non-Executive Director
Hugh Killen, CEO, Managing Director
Shehan Dissanayake, Non-Executive Director
Andrew OBrien, Chief Officer
Sarah Hackett, Director Culture
Thomas Keene, Non-Executive Director

Australian Stock Performance Indicators

The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right pink sheet is not an easy task. Is Australian Agricultural a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Australian Agricultural in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Australian Agricultural's short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Australian Agricultural options trading.

Pair Trading with Australian Agricultural

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Australian Agricultural position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Australian Agricultural will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Moving against Australian Pink Sheet

  0.9KR Kroger Company Financial Report 20th of June 2024 PairCorr
  0.85MHGVY Mowi ASA ADRPairCorr
  0.85LYFT LYFT Inc Financial Report 2nd of May 2024 PairCorr
  0.83SALRF SalMar ASAPairCorr
  0.76PLTR Palantir TechnologiesInc Downward RallyPairCorr
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Australian Agricultural could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Australian Agricultural when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Australian Agricultural - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Australian Agricultural to buy it.
The correlation of Australian Agricultural is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Australian Agricultural moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Australian Agricultural moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Australian Agricultural can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching
Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Australian Agricultural. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in price.
Note that the Australian Agricultural information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Australian Agricultural's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Center module to all portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios.

Complementary Tools for Australian Pink Sheet analysis

When running Australian Agricultural's price analysis, check to measure Australian Agricultural's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Australian Agricultural is operating at the current time. Most of Australian Agricultural's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Australian Agricultural's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Australian Agricultural's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Australian Agricultural to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Please note, there is a significant difference between Australian Agricultural's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Australian Agricultural is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Australian Agricultural's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.