Philip McLaughlin - City Holding Independent Chairman of the Board
| CHCO Stock | USD 103.85 0.31 0.30% |
Chairman
Mr. Philip L. McLaughlin is no longer NonExecutive Chairman of the Board of City Holding Co. effective December 31 2015. Mr. McLaughlin received a Bachelor degree from the College of William and Mary University Williamsburg Virginia. He also completed the Stonier Graduate School of Banking program at Rutgers University
| Age | 73 |
| Phone | 304 769 1100 |
| Web | https://www.bankatcity.com |
City Holding Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.019 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.019 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.1823 %, meaning that it created $0.1823 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. City Holding's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well City Holding manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | CHAIRMAN Age | ||
| David Blake | First Northwest Bancorp | 67 | |
| Stephen Oliver | First Northwest Bancorp | 67 | |
| Hugh Smith | HMN Financial | 78 | |
| Daniel West | Plumas Bancorp | 64 | |
| Thomas Lankey | Magyar Bancorp | 57 | |
| Richard McHugh | Citizens Community Bancorp | 72 | |
| Dominick DeNaples | FNCB Bancorp | 76 | |
| Daniel Herndon | Home Federal Bancorp | 77 | |
| Terrance Reeson | Plumas Bancorp | 79 | |
| Robert Bartlein | Community West Bancshares | 66 | |
| Patrick Baird | QCR Holdings | 64 | |
| William Hidalgo | Investar Holding Corp | 71 | |
| William Peeples | Community West Bancshares | 71 | |
| James Brownson | QCR Holdings | 68 | |
| Morris Tharp | Sierra Bancorp | 78 | |
| Kim Chaney | Cullman Bancorp | 52 | |
| James Holly | Sierra Bancorp | 77 | |
| Michael Swenson | Citizens Community Bancorp | 64 | |
| Kirk Stovesand | Community West Bancshares | 51 | |
| Gene Waldron | Colony Bankcorp | 55 | |
| Joseph Lukacs | Magyar Bancorp | 72 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.18 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.019 |
City Holding Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the City Holding's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: City Holding inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of City. The board's role is to monitor City Holding's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. City Holding's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, City Holding's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| John DeRito, Executive VP of Commercial Banking and Executive VP of Commercial Banking for City National Bank | ||
| Jeffrey Legge, Chief Admin. Officer, CIO, Sr. VP, Chief Admin. Officer of City National Bank, CIO of City National Bank and Sr. VP of City National Bank | ||
| Craig Stilwell, Executive VP of Retail Banking and Executive VP of Retail Banking - City National Bank | ||
| Tracy Hylton, Independent Director | ||
| Sharon Rowe, Independent Director | ||
| Charles Hageboeck, CEO and President Director, Member of Executive Committee, CEO of City National Bank and President of City National Bank | ||
| Charles Fairchilds, Independent Director | ||
| Thomas Burnette, Director | ||
| Patrick Graney, Director | ||
| David Bumgarner, CFO, Chief Accounting Officer, Sr. VP, CFO of City National Bank and Sr. VP of City National Bank | ||
| Jay Goldman, Independent Director | ||
| David Hambrick, Independent Director | ||
| John Elliot, Independent Director | ||
| Dallas Kayser, Independent Director | ||
| Diane StrongTreister, Director | ||
| Thomas Jones, Independent Director | ||
| James Rossi, Independent Director | ||
| Michael Quinlan, Executive Banking | ||
| William File, Independent Director | ||
| Victoria EvansFaw, Senior Secretary | ||
| Robert Fisher, Independent Director | ||
| Philip McLaughlin, Independent Chairman of the Board |
City Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is City Holding a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.18 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.019 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.40 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.50 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.8 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 14.86 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 4.13 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 71.39 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 948.81 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 19.79 X |
Pair Trading with City Holding
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if City Holding position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in City Holding will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with City Stock
| 0.66 | AX | Axos Financial Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.82 | BY | Byline Bancorp Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.78 | PB | Prosperity Bancshares Earnings Call Today | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to City Holding could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace City Holding when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back City Holding - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling City Holding to buy it.
The correlation of City Holding is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as City Holding moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if City Holding moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for City Holding can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in City Holding. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators. To learn how to invest in City Stock, please use our How to Invest in City Holding guide.Note that the City Holding information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other City Holding's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Transaction History module to view history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance.
Complementary Tools for City Stock analysis
When running City Holding's price analysis, check to measure City Holding's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy City Holding is operating at the current time. Most of City Holding's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of City Holding's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move City Holding's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of City Holding to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
| ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
| Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
| Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities | |
| Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data | |
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
| Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
| Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments |
Is City Holding's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of City Holding. If investors know City will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about City Holding listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of City Holding is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of City that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of City Holding's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is City Holding's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because City Holding's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect City Holding's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between City Holding's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if City Holding is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, City Holding's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.