Thomas Jones - City Holding Independent Director
| CHCO Stock | USD 106.14 2.29 2.21% |
Director
Mr. J. Thomas Jones is an Independent Director of the Company. Mr. Jones was the Chief Executive Officer of West Virginia United Health System located in Fairmont, WV, from 2003 until January 2014. Following his retirement, he served as the Consultant to the CEO of West Virginia United Health System until 2015. During his tenure at United Health System, he oversaw its expansion from two hospitalsRuby Memorial in Morgantown and United Hospital Center in Clarksburgto include hospitals in Morgantown, Ranson and Parkersburg and become the largest health system in the state, employing over 10, 000 people on six campuses. Mr. Jones was appointed to The Board of Governors of West Virginia University in 2014. He has also been active in the states business community, and was inducted in 2012 into the West Virginia Business Hall of Fame. He was chair of the Board of Directors of the West Virginia Chamber of Commerce, and has served on the boards of the American Hospital Association, the West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission and many other local, state, and national groups. In 2008, WV Executive magazine named Mr. Jones one of the 50 Most Influential Leaders in West Virginia. He was also recognized as an Outstanding Alumnae of the West Virginia University College of Business and Economics. The Governance Committee nominated Mr. Jones based upon his business experience running a large, complex organization as well as his extensive knowledge of the Morgantown and central WV markets. Mr. Jones owns, directly or indirectly, 4, 168 shares of City Holding Company common stock. since 2013.
| Age | 67 |
| Tenure | 11 years |
| Address | 25 Gatewater Road, Charleston, WV, United States, 25313 |
| Phone | 304 769 1100 |
| Web | https://www.bankatcity.com |
City Holding Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.019 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.019 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.1823 %, meaning that it created $0.1823 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. City Holding's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well City Holding manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 25th of April 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0.01. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to -0.0004. At this time, City Holding's Total Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 25th of April 2024, Non Current Assets Total is likely to grow to about 6.3 B, while Other Assets are likely to drop about 1.7 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Steven McDonald | Community West Bancshares | 74 | |
| Joseph Coccia | FNCB Bancorp | 70 | |
| Cindy Finnie | First Northwest Bancorp | 65 | |
| Steven Coldani | Plumas Bancorp | 64 | |
| Alan Wood | Cullman Bancorp | 43 | |
| Ronald Martin | Oak Valley Bancorp | 67 | |
| Wendy Shannon | HMN Financial | 64 | |
| Todd Gipple | QCR Holdings | 60 | |
| John Moses | FNCB Bancorp | 67 | |
| Thomas Melone | FNCB Bancorp | 55 | |
| James Sims | Community West Bancshares | 78 | |
| Bernard Nigon | HMN Financial | 69 | |
| James Lang | Citizens Community Bancorp | 71 | |
| Craig Curtis | First Northwest Bancorp | 54 | |
| Timothy OReilly | QCR Holdings | 49 | |
| David Flodstrom | First Northwest Bancorp | 68 | |
| Robert Boyce | Investar Holding Corp | 64 | |
| David Westrate | Citizens Community Bancorp | 71 | |
| Woodus Humphrey | Home Federal Bancorp | 77 | |
| Donald Barton | Oak Valley Bancorp | 56 | |
| Matthew Reed | Colony Bankcorp | N/A | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.18 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.019 |
City Holding Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the City Holding's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: City Holding inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of City. The board's role is to monitor City Holding's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. City Holding's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, City Holding's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| John DeRito, Executive VP of Commercial Banking and Executive VP of Commercial Banking for City National Bank | ||
| Jeffrey Legge, Chief Admin. Officer, CIO, Sr. VP, Chief Admin. Officer of City National Bank, CIO of City National Bank and Sr. VP of City National Bank | ||
| Craig Stilwell, Executive VP of Retail Banking and Executive VP of Retail Banking - City National Bank | ||
| Tracy Hylton, Independent Director | ||
| Sharon Rowe, Independent Director | ||
| Charles Hageboeck, CEO and President Director, Member of Executive Committee, CEO of City National Bank and President of City National Bank | ||
| Charles Fairchilds, Independent Director | ||
| Thomas Burnette, Director | ||
| Patrick Graney, Director | ||
| David Bumgarner, CFO, Chief Accounting Officer, Sr. VP, CFO of City National Bank and Sr. VP of City National Bank | ||
| Jay Goldman, Independent Director | ||
| David Hambrick, Independent Director | ||
| John Elliot, Independent Director | ||
| Dallas Kayser, Independent Director | ||
| Diane StrongTreister, Director | ||
| Thomas Jones, Independent Director | ||
| James Rossi, Independent Director | ||
| Michael Quinlan, Executive Banking | ||
| William File, Independent Director | ||
| Victoria EvansFaw, Senior Secretary | ||
| Robert Fisher, Independent Director | ||
| Philip McLaughlin, Independent Chairman of the Board |
City Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is City Holding a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.18 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.019 | |||
| Profit Margin | 0.40 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.50 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 1.8 B | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 14.86 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 4.13 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 71.39 % | |||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 948.81 K | |||
| Price To Earning | 19.79 X |
Pair Trading with City Holding
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if City Holding position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in City Holding will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with City Stock
| 0.72 | AX | Axos Financial Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | BY | Byline Bancorp Normal Trading | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to City Holding could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace City Holding when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back City Holding - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling City Holding to buy it.
The correlation of City Holding is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as City Holding moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if City Holding moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for City Holding can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in City Holding. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators. To learn how to invest in City Stock, please use our How to Invest in City Holding guide.Note that the City Holding information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other City Holding's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.
Complementary Tools for City Stock analysis
When running City Holding's price analysis, check to measure City Holding's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy City Holding is operating at the current time. Most of City Holding's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of City Holding's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move City Holding's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of City Holding to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
| FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
| Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
| Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
| My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
| Global Markets Map Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes | |
| Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
| Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
| Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
| Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope |
Is City Holding's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of City Holding. If investors know City will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about City Holding listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.10) | Dividend Share 2.73 | Earnings Share 7.61 | Revenue Per Share 19.278 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.01) |
The market value of City Holding is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of City that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of City Holding's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is City Holding's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because City Holding's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect City Holding's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between City Holding's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if City Holding is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, City Holding's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.