Tracy Hylton - City Holding Independent Director
| CHCO Stock | USD 98.70 0.35 0.36% |
Director
Mr. Tracy W. Hylton, II, is an Independent Director of the Company. Mr. Hylton is the President of Eller, Inc., a construction and reclamation company, and President of Lightning, Inc., a lease holding and coal sales company. Mr. Hylton has a number of business interests including those in coal, five auto dealerships, hotels in various states, retail and real estate. Through these business interests he has knowledge of, and contacts with, many other business people throughout the State of West Virginia. He is active in a number of civic organizations, including the Raleigh County YMCA. Mr. Hylton joined the Board of the Bank of Raleigh in 1984, the Board of Horizon Bancorp, Inc. in 1993, and subsequent to the merger with City on December, 31, 1998, the City Holding Company Board. Mr. Hylton has deep business contacts and knowledge of the West Virginia and Raleigh County marketplace. The Governance Committee of the Board nominated Mr. Hylton based upon his varied business interests, knowledge, and contacts, his knowledge of the Raleigh County market, and his experience on bank boards. Mr. Hylton owns, directly or indirectly, 57, 651 shares of City Holding Company common stock. since 1993.
| Age | 69 |
| Tenure | 31 years |
| Address | 25 Gatewater Road, Charleston, WV, United States, 25313 |
| Phone | 304 769 1100 |
| Web | https://www.bankatcity.com |
City Holding Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.019 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.019 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.1823 %, meaning that it created $0.1823 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. City Holding's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well City Holding manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 18th of April 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0.01. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to -0.0004. At this time, City Holding's Total Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 18th of April 2024, Non Current Assets Total is likely to grow to about 6.3 B, while Other Assets are likely to drop about 1.7 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| George Ralph | QCR Holdings | 58 | |
| Woodus Humphrey | Home Federal Bancorp | 77 | |
| Michael Jones | Oak Valley Bancorp | 68 | |
| Dana Boutain | Community West Bancshares | N/A | |
| Lindsay Corby | QCR Holdings | 36 | |
| Terrance Withrow | Oak Valley Bancorp | 54 | |
| John Brignac | Investar Holding Corp | 73 | |
| Tom Dobyns | Community West Bancshares | N/A | |
| Robert Boyce | Investar Holding Corp | 64 | |
| Robert Freeman | Investar Holding Corp | 79 | |
| William Bracey | FNCB Bancorp | 59 | |
| William Peinhardt | Cullman Bancorp | 63 | |
| Alan Wood | Cullman Bancorp | 43 | |
| David Lukinovich | Investar Holding Corp | 57 | |
| Thomas Besselman | Investar Holding Corp | 67 | |
| Lynda Scearcy | Sierra Bancorp | 72 | |
| Mark Utz | HMN Financial | 57 | |
| Jennifer Zaccardo | First Northwest Bancorp | 63 | |
| Todd Gipple | QCR Holdings | 60 | |
| Allen Berning | HMN Financial | 63 | |
| Paul Bussman | Cullman Bancorp | 53 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.18 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.019 |
City Holding Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the City Holding's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: City Holding inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of City. The board's role is to monitor City Holding's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. City Holding's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, City Holding's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| John DeRito, Executive VP of Commercial Banking and Executive VP of Commercial Banking for City National Bank | ||
| Jeffrey Legge, Chief Admin. Officer, CIO, Sr. VP, Chief Admin. Officer of City National Bank, CIO of City National Bank and Sr. VP of City National Bank | ||
| Craig Stilwell, Executive VP of Retail Banking and Executive VP of Retail Banking - City National Bank | ||
| Tracy Hylton, Independent Director | ||
| Sharon Rowe, Independent Director | ||
| Charles Hageboeck, CEO and President Director, Member of Executive Committee, CEO of City National Bank and President of City National Bank | ||
| Charles Fairchilds, Independent Director | ||
| Thomas Burnette, Director | ||
| Patrick Graney, Director | ||
| David Bumgarner, CFO, Chief Accounting Officer, Sr. VP, CFO of City National Bank and Sr. VP of City National Bank | ||
| Jay Goldman, Independent Director | ||
| David Hambrick, Independent Director | ||
| John Elliot, Independent Director | ||
| Dallas Kayser, Independent Director | ||
| Diane StrongTreister, Director | ||
| Thomas Jones, Independent Director | ||
| James Rossi, Independent Director | ||
| Michael Quinlan, Executive Banking | ||
| William File, Independent Director | ||
| Victoria EvansFaw, Senior Secretary | ||
| Robert Fisher, Independent Director | ||
| Philip McLaughlin, Independent Chairman of the Board |
City Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is City Holding a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.18 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.019 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.40 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.50 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.72 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 14.86 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 4.10 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 71.39 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 948.81 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 19.79 X |
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards City Holding in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, City Holding's short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from City Holding options trading.
Pair Trading with City Holding
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if City Holding position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in City Holding will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with City Stock
| 0.75 | AX | Axos Financial Financial Report 25th of April 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | BY | Byline Bancorp Report 25th of April 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.88 | PB | Prosperity Bancshares Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
Moving against City Stock
| 0.43 | TECTP | Tectonic Financial | PairCorr |
| 0.42 | VBFC | Village Bank | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to City Holding could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace City Holding when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back City Holding - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling City Holding to buy it.
The correlation of City Holding is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as City Holding moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if City Holding moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for City Holding can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in City Holding. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators. To learn how to invest in City Stock, please use our How to Invest in City Holding guide.Note that the City Holding information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other City Holding's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .
Complementary Tools for City Stock analysis
When running City Holding's price analysis, check to measure City Holding's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy City Holding is operating at the current time. Most of City Holding's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of City Holding's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move City Holding's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of City Holding to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
| Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
| Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
| Crypto Correlations Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins | |
| Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges |
Is City Holding's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of City Holding. If investors know City will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about City Holding listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.10) | Dividend Share 2.73 | Earnings Share 7.61 | Revenue Per Share 19.278 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.01) |
The market value of City Holding is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of City that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of City Holding's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is City Holding's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because City Holding's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect City Holding's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between City Holding's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if City Holding is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, City Holding's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.