Amy Chang - Cisco Systems Director
CSCO Stock | USD 49.77 0.22 0.44% |
Director
Ms. Amy L. Chang is Independent Director of the Company. She was a member of the Board of Directors since October 2016. She has served as the Chief Executive Officer and Founder of Accompany, a relationship intelligence platform company, since May 2013. Prior to founding Accompany, Ms. Chang was with Google Inc. from July 2005 to November 2012, most recently serving as Global Head of Product, Google Ads Measurement and Reporting. Prior to joining Google, Ms. Chang held product management and strategy positions at eBay Inc. from May 2003 to June 2005. She also previously served as a consultant with McKinsey Company, specializing in semiconductors, software and services. Ms. Chang also currently serves on the board of directors of The Procter Gamble Company. She previously served as a director of Informatica Corporationrationration, ending in 2015 and Splunk, Inc., ending in 2017 since 2016.
Age | 39 |
Tenure | 8 years |
Address | 170 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, CA, United States, 95134-1706 |
Phone | (408) 526-4000 |
Web | https://www.cisco.com |
Cisco Systems Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.102 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.102 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.3065 %, meaning that it created $0.3065 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Cisco Systems' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Cisco Systems manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 28th of March 2024, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to 0.29. Also, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.15. At this time, Cisco Systems' Return On Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 28th of March 2024, Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 0.80, while Total Current Assets are likely to drop about 32.1 B.Similar Executives
Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
Eric Fredrickson | Desktop Metal | 51 | |
HungHum Leung | Deswell Industries | 66 | |
Cheryl Shavers | Knowles Cor | 67 | |
Christine Vujovich | Kimball Electronics | 65 | |
Rollance Olson | Fabrinet | 77 | |
Steven Mayer | Knowles Cor | 57 | |
Andrew Ryu | Desktop Metal | N/A | |
Joseph Rigby | Desktop Metal | 58 | |
Thomas Kelly | Fabrinet | 67 | |
Hermann Eul | Knowles Cor | 62 | |
Manuel Gasperini | Desktop Metal | N/A | |
Robert Phillippy | Kimball Electronics | 57 | |
Richard Lochridge | Knowles Cor | 73 | |
Didier Hirsch | Knowles Cor | 69 | |
YauNam Cham | Deswell Industries | 67 | |
Davide Dattoli | Desktop Metal | N/A | |
Gregory Thaxton | Kimball Electronics | 56 | |
Keith Barnes | Knowles Cor | 69 | |
Edmondo Sparano | Desktop Metal | N/A | |
Robert Cremin | Knowles Cor | 73 | |
Charles Schade | Desktop Metal | N/A |
Management Performance
Cisco Systems Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Cisco Systems' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Cisco Systems inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Cisco. The board's role is to monitor Cisco Systems' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Cisco Systems' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Cisco Systems' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
David Goeckeler, Executive Vice President General Manager - Security and Networking Business | ||
Kip Compton, Operations, Strategy | ||
Irving Tan, Senior Vice President Operations | ||
Brenton Saunders, Director | ||
Amy Chang, Director | ||
Deborah Stahlkopf, Chief VP | ||
John Hennessy, Independent Director | ||
Maria Poveromo, Senior Officer | ||
Marilyn Mora, Director Relations | ||
Brian Halla, Independent Director | ||
Rebecca Jacoby, COO and Sr. VP | ||
Roderick McGeary, Independent Director | ||
Kristina Johnson, Independent Director | ||
Steven West, Independent Director | ||
Gerri Elliott, Executive Vice President and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer | ||
Ahmed Badri, Head Relations | ||
John Chambers, Executive Chairman and Member of Acquisition Committee | ||
Derek Idemoto, Senior Investments | ||
Karen Walker, Senior Vice President Chief Marketing Officer | ||
Victoria Wong, Senior Officer | ||
Mark Garrett, Director | ||
Fletcher Previn, Senior Officer | ||
Anurag Dhingra, CTO SVP | ||
Richard Herren, Executive CFO | ||
Michael Capellas, Director | ||
Arun Sarin, Independent Director | ||
Christopher Dedicoat, Executive Vice President Worldwide Sales and Field Operations | ||
Maria Martinez, Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Experience Officer | ||
Kelly Kramer, CFO and Executive VP | ||
Pratik Bhatt, VP Officer | ||
Charles Robbins, CEO and Director | ||
Pankaj Patel, Chief Devel. Officer of Global Engineering and Executive VP | ||
Jeffery Sharritts, Executive Officer | ||
Thimaya Subaiya, Executive Operations | ||
Wesley Bush, Director | ||
Carrie Palin, Senior Officer | ||
Mark Chandler, Senior Vice President - Legal Services, Chief Compliance Officer, General Counsel, Secretary | ||
Michele Burns, Independent Director | ||
Chris Dedicoat, Executive Vice President Worldwide Sales | ||
Andrew Ashton, Senior Finance | ||
Carol Bartz, Lead Independent Director |
Cisco Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Cisco Systems a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Return On Equity | 0.31 | ||||
Return On Asset | 0.1 | ||||
Profit Margin | 0.23 % | ||||
Operating Margin | 0.24 % | ||||
Current Valuation | 187.5 B | ||||
Shares Outstanding | 4.05 B | ||||
Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.06 % | ||||
Shares Owned By Institutions | 78.04 % | ||||
Number Of Shares Shorted | 44.28 M | ||||
Price To Earning | 17.95 X |
Pair Trading with Cisco Systems
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Cisco Systems position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cisco Systems will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Cisco Stock
0.61 | EMKR | EMCORE Financial Report 2nd of May 2024 | PairCorr |
Moving against Cisco Stock
0.73 | CLFD | Clearfield Financial Report 2nd of May 2024 | PairCorr |
0.65 | NNDM | Nano Dimension Report 4th of April 2024 | PairCorr |
0.63 | RGTIW | Rigetti Computing | PairCorr |
0.63 | OSS | One Stop Systems Financial Report 9th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
0.53 | CDW | CDW Corp Financial Report 1st of May 2024 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Cisco Systems could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Cisco Systems when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Cisco Systems - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Cisco Systems to buy it.
The correlation of Cisco Systems is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Cisco Systems moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Cisco Systems moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Cisco Systems can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Cisco Systems. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators. To learn how to invest in Cisco Stock, please use our How to Invest in Cisco Systems guide.Note that the Cisco Systems information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Cisco Systems' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.
Complementary Tools for Cisco Stock analysis
When running Cisco Systems' price analysis, check to measure Cisco Systems' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Cisco Systems is operating at the current time. Most of Cisco Systems' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Cisco Systems' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Cisco Systems' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Cisco Systems to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
Portfolio Dashboard Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments | |
Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital |
Is Cisco Systems' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Cisco Systems. If investors know Cisco will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Cisco Systems listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.03) | Dividend Share 1.56 | Earnings Share 3.29 | Revenue Per Share 14.067 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.06) |
The market value of Cisco Systems is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Cisco that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Cisco Systems' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Cisco Systems' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Cisco Systems' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Cisco Systems' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Cisco Systems' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Cisco Systems is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Cisco Systems' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.