Leslie Brun - Hewlett Packard Independent Director
| HPE Stock | USD 16.93 0.10 0.59% |
Director
Mr. Leslie A. Brun is Independent Director of the Company., since 2015 since 2015.
| Age | 64 |
| Tenure | 9 years |
| Address | 1701 East Mossy Oaks Road, Spring, TX, United States, 77389 |
| Phone | 678 259 9860 |
| Web | https://www.hpe.com |
Hewlett Packard Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0261 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0261 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.092 %, implying that it generated $0.092 on every 100 dollars invested. Hewlett Packard's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Hewlett Packard manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of April 25, 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is expected to decline to 0.04. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is expected to decline to 0.05. At present, Hewlett Packard's Other Current Assets are projected to decrease significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Total Current Assets is expected to grow to about 17.1 B, whereas Non Current Assets Total are forecasted to decline to about 33 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Eli Doron | Silicom | 65 | |
| Raanan Cohen | Nova | 60 | |
| Eyal BenChelouche | Sapiens International | 55 | |
| Eli Fruchter | Nova | 61 | |
| Dafna Cohen | Formula Systems 1985 | 45 | |
| Eliyahu Zamir | Formula Systems 1985 | 46 | |
| Itzhak Danziger | Allot Communications | 64 | |
| Marek Panek | Formula Systems 1985 | 45 | |
| Avi Cohen | Nova | 64 | |
| Miron Kenneth | Nova | 60 | |
| Steven Levy | Allot Communications | 57 | |
| Zehava Simon | Nova | 58 | |
| Alon Dumanis | Nova | 66 | |
| Yigal Jacoby | Allot Communications | 52 | |
| Nurit Benjamini | Allot Communications | 51 | |
| Dafna Gruber | Nova | 52 | |
| Dan Falk | Nova | 70 | |
| Sigalit Orr | Allot Communications | N/A | |
| Naamit Salomon | Sapiens International | 53 | |
| Iris Yahal | Formula Systems 1985 | 53 | |
| Eliahu Zamir | Formula Systems 1985 | 47 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.092 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0261 |
Hewlett Packard Ente Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Hewlett Packard's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Hewlett Packard inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Hewlett. The board's role is to monitor Hewlett Packard's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Hewlett Packard's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Hewlett Packard's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| LipBu Tan, Independent Director | ||
| Jeffrey Kvaal, Head Relations | ||
| Glenn Leon, Sr Officer | ||
| Mary Wilderotter, Independent Director | ||
| Justin Hotard, Senior Vice President General Manager - High Performance Computing and Artificial Intelligence | ||
| Heiko Meyer, Executive Officer | ||
| Raymond Lane, Independent Director | ||
| Kirt Karros, Senior Vice President - Finance, Treasurer | ||
| John Schultz, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Administrative Officer, Secretary | ||
| Neil MacDonald, Senior Vice President General Manager - Compute | ||
| Marie Myers, Executive CFO | ||
| Keerti Melkote, President - Intelligent Edge | ||
| Marcus Kupferschmidt, Director Intelligence | ||
| Bethany Mayer, Chief Director | ||
| Margaret Whitman, CEO and President and Director | ||
| Patricia Russo, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Aisha Washington, Equity Diversity | ||
| Gerri Gold, President VP | ||
| Alan May, Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer | ||
| Jason Newton, Vice Messaging | ||
| Jeff Ricci, Senior Vice President, Controller, Principal Accounting Officer | ||
| Henry Gomez, Executive Vice President Chief Marketing and Communications Officer | ||
| Rom Kosla, Chief Officer | ||
| Antonio Neri, Executive Vice President and General Manager - Enterprise Group | ||
| Michael Nefkens, Executive VP of Enterprise Services and General Manager of Enterprise Services | ||
| Ann Livermore, Independent Director | ||
| Tarek Robbiati, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Gregg Melinson, Senior Affairs | ||
| Gary Reiner, Independent Director | ||
| Jim Jackson, Executive Officer | ||
| Irving Rothman, President and Chief Executive Officer of HPE Financial Services (FS) | ||
| Thomas Black, Senior Vice President General Manager - Storage | ||
| Kirt CFA, Treasurer VP | ||
| Raymond Ozzie, Independent Director | ||
| Wolfgang Egger, VP Africa | ||
| Daniel Ammann, Independent Director | ||
| Philip Mottram, President - Intelligent Edge | ||
| Christopher Hsu, COO and Executive VP | ||
| Jeremy Cox, Controller, VP | ||
| Marc Andreessen, Independent Director | ||
| MSc MBA, Ex CFO | ||
| Jennifer Temple, Executive Officer | ||
| Peter Ungaro, Senior Vice President General Manager - High Performance Compute and Mission-Critical Systems and Hewlett Packard Labs | ||
| Fidelma Russo, Ex CTO | ||
| Charles Noski, Independent Director | ||
| Mark Bakker, Executive Operations | ||
| Timothy Stonesifer, CFO and Executive VP | ||
| John Hinshaw, Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Officer | ||
| Pamela Carter, Independent Director | ||
| Ray Lane, Independent Director | ||
| Michael Angelakis, Independent Director | ||
| Leslie Brun, Independent Director | ||
| Robert Youngjohns, Executive Vice President and General Manager - HPE Software | ||
| Martin Fink, Executive Vice President CTO and Director of Hewlett Packard Labs | ||
| Philip Davis, Chief Sales Officer and Presidentident of Hybrid IT | ||
| Jean Hobby, Independent Director | ||
| Phil Mottram, President - Intelligent Edge | ||
| Rashmi Kumar, VP Officer | ||
| Andrew Simanek, Head of Investor Relations | ||
| Ahmad Alkhallafi, Managing Region | ||
| Pradeep Kumar, Senior Services | ||
| Klaus Kleinfeld, Independent Director | ||
| Tom Black, Senior Vice President General Manager - Storage | ||
| George Kurtz, Independent Director |
Hewlett Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Hewlett Packard a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.092 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0261 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.07 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.09 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 31.85 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 1.3 B | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.60 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 83.45 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 27.77 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 5.52 X |
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in american community survey. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.
Complementary Tools for Hewlett Stock analysis
When running Hewlett Packard's price analysis, check to measure Hewlett Packard's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Hewlett Packard is operating at the current time. Most of Hewlett Packard's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Hewlett Packard's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Hewlett Packard's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Hewlett Packard to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine | |
| Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
| Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
| Sync Your Broker Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors. | |
| Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
| Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
| Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
| ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
| Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
| Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
| Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
| Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon |
Is Hewlett Packard's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Hewlett Packard. If investors know Hewlett will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Hewlett Packard listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.24) | Dividend Share 0.49 | Earnings Share 1.45 | Revenue Per Share 21.605 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.14) |
The market value of Hewlett Packard Ente is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Hewlett that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Hewlett Packard's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Hewlett Packard's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Hewlett Packard's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Hewlett Packard's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Hewlett Packard's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Hewlett Packard is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Hewlett Packard's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.