Charles Noski - Microsoft Independent Director
MSFT Stock | USD 417.32 0.90 0.22% |
Director
Mr. Charles H. Noski is an Independent Director of the Company. He served as Vice Chairman of Bank of America Corporation from June 2011 until September 2012. From May 2010 through June 2011, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Bank of America Corporationrationration. From 2003 to 2005, he served as Corporationrationrate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Northrop Grumman Corporation and served as a director from 2002 to 2005. Mr. Noski joined ATT in 1999 as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and was named Vice Chairman of ATTs board of directors in 2002. Mr. Noski retired from ATT upon completion of its restructuring in 2002. Prior to joining ATT, Mr. Noski was President, Chief Operating Officer, and a member of the board of directors of Hughes Electronics Corporationrationration, a publicly traded subsidiary of General Motors Corporation in the satellite and wireless communications business. He is Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Financial Accounting Foundation, a member of the AICPA and FEI, a past member of the Standing Advisory Group of the PCAOB, and a director of the National Association of Corporationrationrate Directors. Qualifications With his extensive background in finance, accounting, risk, capital markets, and business operations, Mr. Noski has a unique portfolio of business skills. He has served as a senior executive officer or head of a business unit of a major public company in a variety of contexts. A large part of Mr. Noskis executive experience was in the technology sector, including multinational telecommunications companies. His service with leading organizations in the accounting and auditing fields reflects his expertise in finance and accounting matters. Mr. Noski has served on a wide range of public company boards in the technology, industrial, and finance fields. since 2003.
Age | 65 |
Tenure | 21 years |
Professional Marks | CPA |
Address | One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, United States, 98052-6399 |
Phone | 425 882 8080 |
Web | https://www.microsoft.com |
Microsoft Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1519 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1519 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.3917 %, meaning that it created $0.3917 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Microsoft's Return On Capital Employed is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Assets is likely to gain to 0.20 in 2024, whereas Return On Equity is likely to drop 0.24 in 2024. At this time, Microsoft's Total Current Liabilities is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to gain to about 497.5 B in 2024, whereas Change To Liabilities is likely to drop slightly above 6.9 B in 2024.Similar Executives
Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
Pamela Bailey | Global Blue Group | 65 | |
James Leung | Global Blue Group | N/A | |
Earvin Johnson | Block Inc | 55 | |
Mary Meeker | Block Inc | 60 | |
Martin Skanberg | Veritone | 48 | |
Paul Krieger | Veritone | N/A | |
Naveen Rao | Block Inc | ||
Anna Patterson | Block Inc | 54 | |
Randall Garutti | Block Inc | 45 | |
Edward Treska | Veritone | N/A | |
Christian Rajter | Veritone | 43 | |
Jeff Gehl | Veritone | 50 | |
Roelof Botha | Block Inc | 47 | |
Lawrence Summers | Block Inc | 65 | |
Christopher Oates | Veritone | 48 | |
David Viniar | Block Inc | 65 | |
Chi Kan | Global Blue Group | N/A | |
James McKelvey | Block Inc | 59 | |
Joseph Dziedzic | Global Blue Group | 46 | |
Peter Soderberg | Global Blue Group | 67 | |
Anders Moberg | Veritone | 44 |
Management Performance
Return On Equity | 0.39 | ||||
Return On Asset | 0.15 |
Microsoft Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Microsoft's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Microsoft inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Microsoft. The board's role is to monitor Microsoft's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Microsoft's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Microsoft's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Bradford LCA, President Chairman | ||
Hossein Nowbar, Chief Officer | ||
Charles Scharf, Director | ||
Sean Ventura, Vice President - Information Security, Chief Information Security Officer | ||
Christopher Young, Strategy Development | ||
Takeshi Numoto, Executive Officer | ||
Chris Suh, General Manager - Investor Relations | ||
Helmut Panke, Independent Director | ||
JeanPhilippe Courtois, Executive Vice President and President - Microsoft Global Sales, Marketing and Operations | ||
Penny Pritzker, Independent Director | ||
Judson Althoff, Executive Officer | ||
Sandra Peterson, Independent Director | ||
Frank Shaw, Corp Communications | ||
Teri ListStoll, Independent Director | ||
Charles Noski, Independent Director | ||
Christopher Capossela, Executive Vice President Chief Marketing Officer | ||
Margaret Johnson, Executive Vice President - Business Development | ||
John Thompson, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
Amy Hood, CFO and Executive VP | ||
William Gates, Founder and Technology Advisor, Director | ||
Mason Morfit, Independent Director | ||
Padmasree Warrior, Independent Director | ||
Bradford Smith, Executive Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | ||
Brett Iversen, Vice Relations | ||
Hugh Johnston, Director | ||
Arne Sorenson, Independent Director | ||
Satya Nadella, CEO and Director | ||
Kevin Scott, CTO | ||
Keith Esq, Deputy VP | ||
Keith Lorizio, Vice President - North America Sales | ||
James Scott, Executive CTO | ||
Brian Turner, COO | ||
Kathleen Hogan, Executive Vice President - Human Resources | ||
Alice Jolla, Corporate Officer | ||
John Stanton, Director | ||
Reid Hoffman, Director | ||
Ifeanyi Amah, CTO |
Microsoft Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Microsoft a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Return On Equity | 0.39 | ||||
Return On Asset | 0.15 | ||||
Profit Margin | 0.36 % | ||||
Operating Margin | 0.44 % | ||||
Current Valuation | 3.1 T | ||||
Shares Outstanding | 7.43 B | ||||
Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.05 % | ||||
Shares Owned By Institutions | 73.85 % | ||||
Number Of Shares Shorted | 48.24 M | ||||
Price To Earning | 26.64 X |
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Microsoft. Also, note that the market value of any Company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in census. For more information on how to buy Microsoft Stock please use our How to Invest in Microsoft guide.Note that the Microsoft information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Microsoft's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.
Complementary Tools for Microsoft Stock analysis
When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Global Markets Map Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities |
Is Microsoft's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Microsoft. If investors know Microsoft will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Microsoft listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.332 | Dividend Share 2.86 | Earnings Share 11.08 | Revenue Per Share 30.612 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.176 |
The market value of Microsoft is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Microsoft that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Microsoft's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Microsoft's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Microsoft's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Microsoft's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Microsoft's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Microsoft is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Microsoft's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.