Charles Noski - Microsoft Independent Director

MSFT34 Stock  BRL 86.60  0.23  0.27%   

Director

Mr. Charles H. Noski is an Independent Director of the Company. He served as Vice Chairman of Bank of America Corporation from June 2011 until September 2012. From May 2010 through June 2011, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Bank of America Corporationrationration. From 2003 to 2005, he served as Corporationrationrate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Northrop Grumman Corporation and served as a director from 2002 to 2005. Mr. Noski joined ATT in 1999 as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and was named Vice Chairman of ATTs board of directors in 2002. Mr. Noski retired from ATT upon completion of its restructuring in 2002. Prior to joining ATT, Mr. Noski was President, Chief Operating Officer, and a member of the board of directors of Hughes Electronics Corporationrationration, a publicly traded subsidiary of General Motors Corporation in the satellite and wireless communications business. He is Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Financial Accounting Foundation, a member of the AICPA and FEI, a past member of the Standing Advisory Group of the PCAOB, and a director of the National Association of Corporationrationrate Directors. Qualifications With his extensive background in finance, accounting, risk, capital markets, and business operations, Mr. Noski has a unique portfolio of business skills. He has served as a senior executive officer or head of a business unit of a major public company in a variety of contexts. A large part of Mr. Noskis executive experience was in the technology sector, including multinational telecommunications companies. His service with leading organizations in the accounting and auditing fields reflects his expertise in finance and accounting matters. Mr. Noski has served on a wide range of public company boards in the technology, industrial, and finance fields. since 2003.
Age 65
Tenure 21 years
Professional MarksCPA
Phone425 882 8080
Webhttps://www.microsoft.com
Noski retired from AT&T upon completion of its restructuring in 2002. Prior to joining AT&T, Mr. Noski was President, Chief Operating Officer, and a member of the board of directors of Hughes Electronics Corporationrationrationration, a publicly traded subsidiary of General Motors Corporationration in the satellite and wireless communications business. He is immediate past Chairman of the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council of the FASB, a member of the AICPA and FEI, a past member of the Standing Advisory Group of the PCAOB, and a director of the National Association of Corporationrationrationrate Directors.

Microsoft Management Efficiency

The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1483 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1483 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3931 %, meaning that it generated $0.3931 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.
The company has accumulated 47.03 B in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 83.9, indicating the company may have difficulties to generate enough cash to satisfy its financial obligations. Microsoft has a current ratio of 2.48, suggesting that it is liquid and has the ability to pay its financial obligations in time and when they become due. Debt can assist Microsoft until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Microsoft's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Microsoft sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Microsoft to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Microsoft's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.

Similar Executives

Showing other executives

DIRECTOR Age

Martha KeethVerizon Communications
71
Anne FinucaneCVS Health
64
William WeldonCVS Health
68
Gregory WassonVerizon Communications
58
NancyAnn DeParleCVS Health
60
Mark BertoliniVerizon Communications
62
David BrownCVS Health
65
Donald NicolaisenVerizon Communications
70
Clarence OtisVerizon Communications
63
KarlLudwig KleyVerizon Communications
66
Melanie HealeyVerizon Communications
57
Tony WhiteCVS Health
70
Shellye ArchambeauVerizon Communications
56
Alecia DeCoudreauxCVS Health
62
Richard CarrionVerizon Communications
67
JeanPierre MillonCVS Health
66
Richard SwiftCVS Health
72
Richard BrackenCVS Health
64
Gregory WeaverVerizon Communications
67
Daniel SchulmanVerizon Communications
61
Richard RexachVerizon Communications
63
Microsoft Corporation develops, licenses, and supports software, services, devices, and solutions worldwide. The company was founded in 1975 and is headquartered in Redmond, Washington. MICROSOFT DRN operates under Software - Infrastructure classification in Brazil and is traded on Sao Paolo Stock Exchange. Microsoft (MSFT34) is traded on Sao Paulo Exchange in Brazil and employs 221,000 people.

Management Performance

Microsoft Leadership Team

Elected by the shareholders, the Microsoft's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Microsoft inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Microsoft. The board's role is to monitor Microsoft's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Microsoft's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Microsoft's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Bradford LCA, Pres Chairman
Charles Scharf, Director
Sean Ventura, Vice President - Information Security, Chief Information Security Officer
Christopher Young, Strategy Devel
Chris Suh, General Manager - Investor Relations
Helmut Panke, Independent Director
JeanPhilippe Courtois, Executive Vice President and President - Microsoft Global Sales, Marketing and Operations
Penny Pritzker, Independent Director
Judson Althoff, Ex Officer
Sandra Peterson, Independent Director
Frank Shaw, Corp Communications
Teri ListStoll, Independent Director
Charles Noski, Independent Director
Christopher Capossela, Executive Vice President Chief Marketing Officer
Margaret Johnson, Executive Vice President - Business Development
John Thompson, Independent Chairman of the Board
Amy Hood, CFO and Executive VP
William Gates, Founder and Technology Advisor, Director
Mason Morfit, Independent Director
Padmasree Warrior, Independent Director
Bradford Smith, Executive Vice President General Counsel, Secretary
Brett Iversen, Gen Relations
Hugh Johnston, Director
Arne Sorenson, Independent Director
Satya Nadella, CEO and Director
Kevin Scott, CTO
Keith Esq, Deputy VP
Keith Lorizio, Vice President - North America Sales
Brian Turner, COO
Kathleen Hogan, Executive Vice President - Human Resources
Alice Jolla, Co Officer
John Stanton, Director
Reid Hoffman, Director
Ifeanyi Amah, CTO

Microsoft Stock Performance Indicators

The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Microsoft a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Microsoft in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Microsoft's short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Microsoft options trading.

Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!

The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.

Try AI Portfolio Architect
When determining whether Microsoft is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if Microsoft Stock is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Microsoft Stock. Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Microsoft Stock:
Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Microsoft. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in nation.
For information on how to trade Microsoft Stock refer to our How to Trade Microsoft Stock guide.
Note that the Microsoft information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Microsoft's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.

Complementary Tools for Microsoft Stock analysis

When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Please note, there is a significant difference between Microsoft's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Microsoft is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Microsoft's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.