David Copeland - SM Energy President
| SM Stock | USD 50.42 0.31 0.61% |
President
Mr. David W. Copeland is Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Corporationrationrate Secretary of the Company. He was appointed as the Company Corporationrationrate Secretary in July 2011 and Executive Vice President in May 2013. Mr. Copeland has 35 years of experience in the legal profession, including 26 years as internal counsel for various energy companies. Prior to joining the Company, he cofounded Concho Resources Inc., in Midland, Texas, where he served as its Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from April 2004 through November 2009, and then as its Senior Counsel through December 2010. From August 1997 through March 2004, Mr. Copeland served as an executive officer and general counsel of two energy companies he cofounded in Midland, Texas. Mr. Copeland started his career in 1982 with the Stubbeman, McRae, Sealy, Laughlin Browder law firm in Midland, Texas. since 2020.
| Age | 67 |
| Tenure | 4 years |
| Address | 1700 Lincoin Street, Denver, CO, United States, 80203 |
| Phone | 303 861 8140 |
| Web | https://sm-energy.com |
SM Energy Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.102 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.102. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of 0.2441 %, which means that it produced $0.2441 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. SM Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well SM Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, SM Energy's Return On Tangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 16th of April 2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.13, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.12. At this time, SM Energy's Fixed Asset Turnover is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 16th of April 2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.13, while Net Tangible Assets are likely to drop about 2.3 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | PRESIDENT Age | ||
| Steven Schlotterbeck | EQT Corporation | 50 | |
| Joe Niederhofer | Diamondback Energy | N/A | |
| Blaine Stribling | Comstock Resources | 46 | |
| Eduardo Tamraz | Magnolia Oil Gas | 32 | |
| Matthew Spicer | Matador Resources | 56 | |
| Tony Berthelet | Obsidian Energy | N/A | |
| Blake McLean | EQT Corporation | N/A | |
| Robert McNally | EQT Corporation | 46 | |
| Randall Crawford | EQT Corporation | 52 | |
| Lisa Hyland | EQT Corporation | N/A | |
| Jeremiah Ashcroft | EQT Corporation | 44 | |
| Gleeson Riet | SilverBow Resources | 48 | |
| Thomas Hawkins | Diamondback Energy | 70 | |
| David Lancaster | Matador Resources | 64 | |
| David Cecil | Southwestern Energy | 51 | |
| Allan Misner | Murphy Oil | 49 | |
| Michael McFadyen | Murphy Oil | 51 | |
| Mark Hodgson | Obsidian Energy | N/A | |
| Julian Bott | Southwestern Energy | 56 | |
| Mark Scucchi | Range Resources Corp | 46 | |
| David Cannon | Diamondback Energy | N/A | |
Management Performance
SM Energy Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the SM Energy's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: SM Energy inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of SM Energy. The board's role is to monitor SM Energy's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. SM Energy's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, SM Energy's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Susie Piehl, Vice Resources | ||
| James Edwards, IR Contact | ||
| Kenneth Knott, Senior Vice President—Business Development and Land and Assistant Secretary | ||
| Lehman Newton, Senior Vice President - Regional Manager | ||
| Julio Quintana, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Javan Ottoson, CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee | ||
| Dean Lutey, VP Officer | ||
| William Sullivan, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Jennifer Samuels, Sr. Director of Investor Relations | ||
| Patrick Lytle, Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer, Controller | ||
| Gregory Leyendecker, Senior Vice President Regional Manager | ||
| David Whitcomb, Vice President - Marketing | ||
| James Lebeck, Executive Counsel | ||
| Mary Lutey, Senior Vice President — Development and Environmental, Health and Safety | ||
| Mark Mueller, Senior Vice President and Regional Manager, Rocky Mountain Region | ||
| Loren Leiker, Independent Director | ||
| Lehman III, VP Operations | ||
| Herbert Vogel, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| David Copeland, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary | ||
| Julie Gray, Vice Marketing | ||
| William Gardiner, Independent Director | ||
| Rose Robeson, Independent Director | ||
| Stephen Brand, Independent Director | ||
| Candace Lyon, VP HR | ||
| Anita Powers, Independent Director | ||
| Richard Jenkins, Vice Operations | ||
| Wade Pursell, CFO and Executive VP | ||
| Carla Bailo, Independent Director | ||
| Mark Solomon, Vice President Controller, Assistant Secretary | ||
| Larry Bickle, Independent Director | ||
| A Pursell, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Andrew Fiske, Deputy Secretary | ||
| Ramiro Peru, Independent Director |
SM Energy Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is SM Energy a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.24 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.1 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.36 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.53 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 6.83 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 115.03 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.47 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 98.11 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 10.47 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 6.17 X |
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
| LTC | Litecoin | |
| STETH | Staked Ether | |
| LINK | Chainlink | |
| XLM | Stellar | |
| CRO | Cronos |
Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in SM Energy Co. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in population. You can also try the Aroon Oscillator module to analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios.
Complementary Tools for SM Energy Stock analysis
When running SM Energy's price analysis, check to measure SM Energy's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy SM Energy is operating at the current time. Most of SM Energy's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of SM Energy's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move SM Energy's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of SM Energy to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
| Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators | |
| Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
| Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
| Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
| Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges |
Is SM Energy's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of SM Energy. If investors know SM Energy will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about SM Energy listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.013 | Dividend Share 0.63 | Earnings Share 6.86 | Revenue Per Share 19.117 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.09) |
The market value of SM Energy is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of SM Energy that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of SM Energy's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is SM Energy's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because SM Energy's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect SM Energy's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between SM Energy's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if SM Energy is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, SM Energy's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.