Pair Correlation Between OMXVGI and Russell 2000

This module allows you to analyze existing cross correlation between OMXVGI and Russell 2000 . You can compare the effects of market volatilities on OMXVGI and Russell 2000 and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in OMXVGI with a short position of Russell 2000. See also your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of OMXVGI and Russell 2000.
Investment Horizon     30 Days    Login   to change
Symbolsvs
 OMXVGI  vs   Russell 2000
 Performance (%) 
      Timeline 

Pair Volatility

Assuming 30 trading days horizon, OMXVGI is expected to generate 0.43 times more return on investment than Russell 2000. However, OMXVGI is 2.32 times less risky than Russell 2000. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Russell 2000 is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  65,388  in OMXVGI on October 18, 2017 and sell it today you would earn a total of  724  from holding OMXVGI or generate 1.11% return on investment over 30 days.

Correlation Coefficient

Pair Corralation between OMXVGI and Russell 2000
-0.47

Parameters

Time Period1 Month [change]
DirectionNegative 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Diversification

Very good diversification

Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding OMXVGI and Russell 2000 in the same portfolio assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Russell 2000 and OMXVGI is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on OMXVGI are associated (or correlated) with Russell 2000. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Russell 2000 has no effect on the direction of OMXVGI i.e. OMXVGI and Russell 2000 go up and down completely randomly.
    Optimize

Comparative Volatility

 Predicted Return Density 
      Returns