Personalized Investing and
Digital Wealth Optimization
Asset Comparison and Correlation |
|
|
| A.P. M vs SGS SA |
Assuming 30 trading days horizon, AP M is not expected to generate positive returns. However, AP M is 91.5 times less risky than SGS SA. It waists most of its returns potential to compensate for thr risk taken. SGS SA is generating about -0.23 per unit of risk. If you would invest 725,000 in AP M on May 19, 2013 and sell it today you would lose (700) from holding AP M or give up 0.1% of portfolio value over 30 days. |
Follow Correlation between AMKBF and SGSOF with Macroaxis syndicated feed, custom widget, or your favorite custom stock ticker
|
Over the last 30 days AP M has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Match-ups for AP M
|
Over the last 30 days SGS SA has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Match-ups for SGS SA |
| Frequently Asked Questions Quick Product Tour Product Technology Overview Solution Methodology Plans and Pricing |
|
World Market Correlations Instant Equity Comparator Watchlist Analysis Position Suggestions Equity Alpha Analysis |
|
About Macroaxis Contact Us Product Terms Of Use Service Privacy Policy Advertising Opportunities |
0.78% 
Select Assests
Optimize Portfolio
Suggest Portfolio
Backtest Watchlist
Analyze Correlations
View Transactions
Check Volatilities
Import Equities
Search Equities
