Welcome to Macroaxis
Sign in to go to your portfolios
Don't have an account? Create It
  Macroaxis: Personalized Investing   The proven technology to invest wisely
Macroaxis Country Selector USA  Change      Macroaxis User Registration Register    Macroaxis User Login Sign In
   
  
 
US Market Closed: May 25, 19:12 PM 2012  
FNMFO KDDIF 096770 AMKBF CTGBZ AU 
 
 
  NYSE  7,534  18.032  Index Moved Down 



Processing
Collecting data for CL and EL ...

Asset Comparison and Correlation

    
       
Investment horizon: 
30 Days (Login to change)
       
 
    
 ColgatePalmolive Co.  and   Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Check Correlation Matrix  
Daily Returns (%)
EL  CL  
Timeline
Allowing for 30-days total investment horizon, ColgatePalmolive is expected to generate 0.49 times more return on investment than Estee. However, ColgatePalmolive is 2.05 times less risky than Estee. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Estee Lauder Companies Inc. is currently generating about -0.43 per unit of risk. If you would invest 9,947 in ColgatePalmolive on April 25, 2012 and sell it today you would lose (34.00) from holding ColgatePalmolive or give up 0.34% of portfolio value over 30 days.

Diversification

Very weak diversification
Overlapping area represents amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding ColgatePalmolive Co. and Estee Lauder Companies Inc. in the same portfolio (assuming nothing else is changed)

Correlation Coefficient

0.41
 Parameters
Time Period1 Month [change]
DirectionPositive EL Moved Up vs CL
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns
    
Follow Correlation between CL and EL with your standard RSS feed, custom widget, or your favorite social app
Add To Reader
 
Add Correlation between CL and EL to your reader
 
Get social with Correlation between CL and EL
 Share Correlation between CL and EL 
Share Share Correlation between CL and EL
    
    
 
       
Predicted Return Density
Expected Daily Returns   
EL  CL  

ColgatePalmolive

 
    
    
ColgatePalmolive
Performance
0
Out Of
100
Over 30
Days
Over the last 30 days ColgatePalmolive has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions.
    
    
Procter & Gamble vs. ColgatePalmolive
KimberlyClark Corporation vs. ColgatePalmolive
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. vs. ColgatePalmolive
Avon Products Inc. vs. ColgatePalmolive
Energizer Holdings Inc. vs. ColgatePalmolive
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. vs. ColgatePalmolive
  

Estee Lauder Companies Inc.

 
    
    
Estee
Performance
0
Out Of
100
Over 30
Days
Over the last 30 days Estee Lauder Companies Inc. has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions.
    
    
Procter & Gamble vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
ColgatePalmolive vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
KimberlyClark Corporation vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Avon Products Inc. vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Energizer Holdings Inc. vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
       


 

 
Analytics
Investor Landscape
Efficient Frontier
Market Correlation
Risk and Return Analysis
Financial Content
Portfolio Projections
Portfolio Backtesting
Tools
FAQs
Retirement Optimizer
RSS and Mobile Access
Company Directory
Advisor Directory
Insider Directory
Wealth Management
About Us
About Macroaxis
Contact Us
Terms Of Use
Privacy Policy
Custom Reporting
Product Tour
More ROI Custom Reporting