Welcome to Macroaxis
Sign in to go to your portfolios
Don't have an account? Create It
  Macroaxis: Personalized Investing   The proven technology to invest wisely
Macroaxis Country Selector USA  Change      Macroaxis User Registration Register    Macroaxis User Login Sign In
   
  
 
US Market Closed: May 25, 19:12 PM 2012  
PTTCX PTTRX PTTBX PTRRX PTTPX PTRAX 
 
 
  NYSE  7,534  18.032  Index Moved Down 



Processing
Collecting data for CL and ENR ...

Asset Comparison and Correlation

    
       
Investment horizon: 
30 Days (Login to change)
       
 
    
 ColgatePalmolive Co.  and   Energizer Holdings Inc.
Check Correlation Matrix  
Daily Returns (%)
ENR  CL  
Timeline
Allowing for 30-days total investment horizon, ColgatePalmolive is expected to under-perform the Energizer. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, ColgatePalmolive is 2.75 times less risky than Energizer. The stock trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Energizer Holdings Inc. is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 7,168 in Energizer Holdings Inc. on April 25, 2012 and sell it today you would earn a total of 18.00 from holding Energizer Holdings Inc. or generate 0.25% return on investment over 30 days.

Diversification

Very weak diversification
Overlapping area represents amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding ColgatePalmolive Co. and Energizer Holdings Inc. in the same portfolio (assuming nothing else is changed)

Correlation Coefficient

0.42
 Parameters
Time Period1 Month [change]
DirectionPositive ENR Moved Up vs CL
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns
    
Follow Correlation between CL and ENR with your standard RSS feed, custom widget, or your favorite social app
Add To Reader
 
Add Correlation between CL and ENR to your reader
 
Get social with Correlation between CL and ENR
 Share Correlation between CL and ENR 
Share Share Correlation between CL and ENR
    
    
 
       
Predicted Return Density
Expected Daily Returns   
ENR  CL  

ColgatePalmolive

 
    
    
ColgatePalmolive
Performance
0
Out Of
100
Over 30
Days
Over the last 30 days ColgatePalmolive has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions.
    
    
Procter & Gamble vs. ColgatePalmolive
KimberlyClark Corporation vs. ColgatePalmolive
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. vs. ColgatePalmolive
Avon Products Inc. vs. ColgatePalmolive
Energizer Holdings Inc. vs. ColgatePalmolive
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. vs. ColgatePalmolive
  

Energizer Holdings Inc.

 
    
    
Energizer
Performance
1
Out Of
100
Over 30
Days
99% of all equities and portfolios perform better than Energizer Holdings Inc.. Compared with the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energizer Holdings Inc. are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 30 days.
    
    
Procter & Gamble vs. Energizer Holdings Inc.
ColgatePalmolive vs. Energizer Holdings Inc.
KimberlyClark Corporation vs. Energizer Holdings Inc.
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. vs. Energizer Holdings Inc.
Avon Products Inc. vs. Energizer Holdings Inc.
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. vs. Energizer Holdings Inc.
       


 

 
Analytics
Investor Landscape
Efficient Frontier
Market Correlation
Risk and Return Analysis
Financial Content
Portfolio Projections
Portfolio Backtesting
Tools
FAQs
Retirement Optimizer
RSS and Mobile Access
Company Directory
Advisor Directory
Insider Directory
Wealth Management
About Us
About Macroaxis
Contact Us
Terms Of Use
Privacy Policy
Custom Reporting
Product Tour
More ROI Custom Reporting