Correlation Between Salesforce and Microsoft

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Salesforce and Microsoft at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Salesforce and Microsoft into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Salesforce and Microsoft, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Salesforce and Microsoft and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Salesforce with a short position of Microsoft. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Salesforce and Microsoft.

Diversification Opportunities for Salesforce and Microsoft

0.69
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Salesforce and Microsoft is 0.69. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Salesforce and Microsoft in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Microsoft and Salesforce is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Salesforce are associated (or correlated) with Microsoft. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Microsoft has no effect on the direction of Salesforce i.e., Salesforce and Microsoft go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Salesforce and Microsoft

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Salesforce is expected to generate 1.29 times more return on investment than Microsoft. However, Salesforce is 1.29 times more volatile than Microsoft. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Microsoft is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  17,734  in Salesforce on January 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  9,458  from holding Salesforce or generate 53.33% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Salesforce  vs.  Microsoft

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Salesforce 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Salesforce has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Salesforce is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Salesforce and Microsoft Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Salesforce and Microsoft

The main advantage of trading using opposite Salesforce and Microsoft positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Salesforce position performs unexpectedly, Microsoft can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Microsoft will offset losses from the drop in Microsoft's long position.
The idea behind Salesforce and Microsoft pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.

Other Complementary Tools

Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity