Welcome to Macroaxis
Sign in to go to your portfolios
Don't have an account? Create It
  Macroaxis: Personalized Investing   The proven technology to invest wisely
Macroaxis Country Selector USA  Change      Macroaxis User Registration Register    Macroaxis User Login Sign In
   



Processing
Collecting data for ENR and EL ...

Asset Comparison and Correlation

    
       
Investment horizon: 
30 Days (Login to change)
       
 
    
 Energizer Holdings Inc.  and   Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Check Correlation Matrix  
Daily Returns (%)
EL  ENR  
Timeline
Considering 30-days investment horizon, Energizer Holdings Inc. is expected to generate 1.36 times more return on investment than Estee. However, Energizer is 1.36 times more volatile than Estee Lauder Companies Inc.. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Estee Lauder Companies Inc. is currently generating about -0.46 per unit of risk. If you would invest 7,171 in Energizer Holdings Inc. on April 26, 2012 and sell it today you would earn a total of 116.00 from holding Energizer Holdings Inc. or generate 1.62% return on investment over 30 days.

Diversification

Weak diversification
Overlapping area represents amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energizer Holdings Inc. and Estee Lauder Companies Inc. in the same portfolio (assuming nothing else is changed)

Correlation Coefficient

0.35
 Parameters
Time Period1 Month [change]
DirectionPositive EL Moved Up vs ENR
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns
    
Follow Correlation between ENR and EL with your standard RSS feed, custom widget, or your favorite social app
Add To Reader
 
Add Correlation between ENR and EL to your reader
 
Get social with Correlation between ENR and EL
 Share Correlation between ENR and EL 
Share Share Correlation between ENR and EL
    
    
 
       
Predicted Return Density
Expected Daily Returns   
EL  ENR  

Energizer Holdings Inc.

 
    
    
Energizer
Performance
1
Out Of
100
Over 30
Days
99% of all equities and portfolios perform better than Energizer Holdings Inc.. Compared with the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energizer Holdings Inc. are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 30 days.
    
    
Procter & Gamble vs. Energizer Holdings Inc.
ColgatePalmolive vs. Energizer Holdings Inc.
KimberlyClark Corporation vs. Energizer Holdings Inc.
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. vs. Energizer Holdings Inc.
Avon Products Inc. vs. Energizer Holdings Inc.
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. vs. Energizer Holdings Inc.
  

Estee Lauder Companies Inc.

 
    
    
Estee
Performance
0
Out Of
100
Over 30
Days
Over the last 30 days Estee Lauder Companies Inc. has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions.
    
    
Procter & Gamble vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
ColgatePalmolive vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
KimberlyClark Corporation vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Avon Products Inc. vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Energizer Holdings Inc. vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
       


 

 
Analytics
Investor Landscape
Efficient Frontier
Market Correlation
Risk and Return Analysis
Financial Content
Portfolio Projections
Portfolio Backtesting
Tools
FAQs
Retirement Optimizer
RSS and Mobile Access
Company Directory
Advisor Directory
Insider Directory
Wealth Management
About Us
About Macroaxis
Contact Us
Terms Of Use
Privacy Policy
Custom Reporting
Product Tour
More ROI Custom Reporting