Ford Company Top Insiders
F Stock | USD 12.06 0.02 0.17% |
Ford employs about 177 K people. The company is managed by 80 executives with a total tenure of roughly 625 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 2212.5 employees per reported executive. Examination of Ford's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
Mark Fields CEO CEO and President and Director |
James Hackett CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
Ford's Insider Buying Vs Selling
50
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-03-06 | Mark Kosman | Disposed 26898 @ 12.53 | View | ||
2023-12-08 | John Douglas Field | Acquired 182000 @ 11.05 | View |
Monitoring Ford's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Ford |
Ford's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Ford Motor, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Ford by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2023-08-16 | Representative Earl Blumenauer | Disposed $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2023-08-14 | Senator Thomas H Tuberville | Acquired $100K to $250K | Verify | ||
2023-04-26 | Senator Tommy Tuberville | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2022-06-16 | Senator Shelley Moore Capito | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2022-05-13 | Representative Ed Perlmutter | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
2021-10-06 | Representative Thomas Suozzi | Disposed $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2020-11-12 | Representative Kenny Marchant | Disposed $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2020-10-09 | Representative Joe Courtney | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-09-16 | Representative Gilbert Cisneros | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-08-11 | Senator Ron Wyden | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2020-07-24 | Representative Gus M. Bilirakis | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-04-02 | Representative Dean Phillips | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2019-02-22 | Representative Linda T. Sanchez | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
2018-12-28 | Senator Sheldon Whitehouse | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2018-09-18 | Representative Rodney Leland Blum | Acquired $50K to $100K | Verify | ||
2018-07-30 | Representative Jackie Speier | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
2017-05-15 | Senator John Hoeven | Acquired $100K to $250K | Verify | ||
2016-03-31 | Senator Bill Cassidy | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2016-03-31 | Senator William Cassidy | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2014-06-06 | Senator Pat Roberts | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Ford Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset of 0.0127 % which means that for every 100 dollars spent on assets, it generated a profit of $0.0127. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.1007 %, implying that it made 0.1007 on every $100 invested by shareholders. Ford's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Ford manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Ford's Return On Assets are most likely to slightly decrease in the upcoming years. The Ford's current Return On Equity is estimated to increase to 0.11, while Return On Capital Employed is projected to decrease to 0.03. At this time, Ford's Asset Turnover is most likely to slightly decrease in the upcoming years.The current Common Stock Shares Outstanding is estimated to decrease to about 2.7 B. The Ford's current Net Loss is estimated to increase to about (2.2 B)
Ford Workforce Comparison
Ford Motor is one of the top stocks in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Consumer Discretionary industry is currently estimated at about 262,775. Ford totals roughly 177,000 in number of employees claiming about 67% of stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.
Ford Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin of 0.02 %, which indicates that it operates at a low-profit margin and even a small decline in sales will erase profits resulting in a net loss, or a negative margin. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin of (0.02) %, which implies that for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated an operating loss of $0.02.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.0871 | 0.0917 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.0294 | 0.031 |
|
|
Ford Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Ford insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Ford's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Ford insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-03-01 | 1.2941 | 66 | 51 | 7,636,846 | 3,730,949 |
2023-12-01 | 1.4286 | 30 | 21 | 2,082,570 | 1,549,139 |
2023-09-01 | 3.25 | 13 | 4 | 379,185 | 34,869 |
2023-06-01 | 3.2727 | 36 | 11 | 1,989,928 | 891,755 |
2023-03-01 | 1.25 | 60 | 48 | 4,146,416 | 2,477,366 |
2022-12-01 | 1.8182 | 20 | 11 | 1,122,035 | 625,236 |
2022-09-01 | 3.75 | 15 | 4 | 2,651,001 | 2,650,129 |
2022-06-01 | 1.7778 | 32 | 18 | 911,636 | 342,162 |
2022-03-01 | 1.375 | 66 | 48 | 3,118,788 | 2,695,982 |
2021-12-01 | 1.5833 | 38 | 24 | 3,969,620 | 2,704,713 |
2021-09-01 | 0.3333 | 2 | 6 | 81,493 | 0.00 |
2021-06-01 | 1.1176 | 19 | 17 | 571,112 | 272,660 |
2021-03-01 | 1.0833 | 78 | 72 | 3,870,448 | 2,495,132 |
2020-12-01 | 0.3158 | 6 | 19 | 433,626 | 906,668 |
2020-09-01 | 0.3889 | 7 | 18 | 6,959,219 | 717,258 |
2020-06-01 | 1.7692 | 23 | 13 | 1,983,106 | 1,639,219 |
2020-03-01 | 1.4167 | 68 | 48 | 4,343,492 | 3,026,617 |
2019-12-01 | 2.625 | 21 | 8 | 140,861 | 131,792 |
2019-09-01 | 3.6667 | 22 | 6 | 895,316 | 100,000 |
2019-06-01 | 2.5714 | 36 | 14 | 593,440 | 774,557 |
2019-03-01 | 1.3061 | 64 | 49 | 3,884,470 | 1,636,545 |
2018-12-01 | 1.8182 | 20 | 11 | 1,434,510 | 1,521,180 |
2018-09-01 | 20.0 | 20 | 1 | 37,914 | 13,000 |
2018-06-01 | 2.6 | 39 | 15 | 483,266 | 339,591 |
2018-03-01 | 1.4306 | 103 | 72 | 5,522,730 | 3,177,312 |
2017-12-01 | 1.1905 | 25 | 21 | 1,198,998 | 1,387,011 |
2017-09-01 | 1.5714 | 22 | 14 | 511,922 | 385,829 |
2017-06-01 | 2.6875 | 43 | 16 | 2,796,905 | 531,591 |
2017-03-01 | 0.8881 | 119 | 134 | 4,625,687 | 4,188,805 |
2016-12-01 | 1.8462 | 24 | 13 | 55,048 | 170,877 |
2016-06-01 | 2.5 | 35 | 14 | 1,382,924 | 2,202,077 |
2016-03-01 | 1.1 | 88 | 80 | 6,707,149 | 7,707,195 |
2015-12-01 | 7.6667 | 23 | 3 | 13,823 | 1,000.00 |
2015-09-01 | 8.3333 | 25 | 3 | 54,268 | 143,479 |
2015-06-01 | 7.6 | 38 | 5 | 197,679 | 180,044 |
2015-03-01 | 1.5763 | 93 | 59 | 4,943,864 | 2,953,919 |
2014-12-01 | 8.6667 | 26 | 3 | 30,351 | 34,000 |
2014-09-01 | 1.8182 | 40 | 22 | 1,346,468 | 1,279,965 |
2014-06-01 | 2.5 | 35 | 14 | 774,893 | 1,362,181 |
2014-03-01 | 1.6875 | 81 | 48 | 8,085,230 | 3,092,986 |
2013-12-01 | 4.7143 | 33 | 7 | 104,925 | 98,422 |
2013-09-01 | 0.9828 | 57 | 58 | 4,822,328 | 9,415,873 |
2013-06-01 | 1.6154 | 42 | 26 | 4,230,025 | 4,682,181 |
2013-03-01 | 1.439 | 118 | 82 | 7,026,174 | 3,374,563 |
2012-12-01 | 1.6667 | 40 | 24 | 527,724 | 795,595 |
2012-09-01 | 3.0 | 36 | 12 | 2,337,305 | 3,372,589 |
2012-06-01 | 10.3333 | 31 | 3 | 270,557 | 215,022 |
2012-03-01 | 1.717 | 91 | 53 | 14,216,569 | 13,352,485 |
2011-12-01 | 5.6667 | 17 | 3 | 206,762 | 248,897 |
2011-09-01 | 3.1667 | 19 | 6 | 552,976 | 457,942 |
2011-06-01 | 1.1 | 22 | 20 | 549,782 | 1,007,893 |
2011-03-01 | 1.2045 | 106 | 88 | 15,310,051 | 7,859,955 |
2010-12-01 | 0.8358 | 56 | 67 | 2,522,408 | 4,944,005 |
2010-09-01 | 1.2381 | 26 | 21 | 6,257,638 | 5,517,854 |
2010-06-01 | 1.5385 | 20 | 13 | 759,780 | 1,457,157 |
2010-03-01 | 1.8235 | 93 | 51 | 13,918,443 | 366,209,795 |
2009-12-01 | 1.8571 | 13 | 7 | 49,908 | 250,837 |
2009-09-01 | 2.4 | 12 | 5 | 39,876 | 219,141 |
2009-06-01 | 6.5 | 13 | 2 | 55,529 | 18,595 |
2009-03-01 | 1.6038 | 85 | 53 | 17,710,476 | 1,114,059 |
2008-12-01 | 4.0 | 20 | 5 | 216,995 | 37,021 |
2008-09-01 | 2.1667 | 13 | 6 | 115,833 | 1,223,507 |
2008-06-01 | 1.0 | 14 | 14 | 119,474 | 211,919 |
2008-03-01 | 1.6522 | 76 | 46 | 9,073,774 | 1,189,898 |
2007-12-01 | 5.0 | 15 | 3 | 249,193 | 7,467 |
2007-09-01 | 5.0 | 15 | 3 | 312,035 | 266,216 |
2007-06-01 | 6.5 | 13 | 2 | 34,742 | 13,519 |
2007-03-01 | 1.463 | 79 | 54 | 10,762,103 | 2,035,396 |
2006-12-01 | 2.2 | 11 | 5 | 40,708 | 22,326 |
2006-09-01 | 2.5455 | 28 | 11 | 56,152 | 140,848 |
2006-06-01 | 2.9091 | 32 | 11 | 144,739 | 111,797 |
2006-03-01 | 1.6034 | 93 | 58 | 4,797,403 | 1,645,860 |
2005-12-01 | 2.5833 | 31 | 12 | 86,378 | 16,665 |
2005-09-01 | 4.5714 | 32 | 7 | 80,993 | 59,609 |
2005-06-01 | 1.3448 | 39 | 29 | 374,980 | 248,601 |
2005-03-01 | 1.6739 | 77 | 46 | 6,250,740 | 2,602,055 |
2004-12-01 | 3.0769 | 40 | 13 | 183,132 | 258,787 |
2004-09-01 | 4.8889 | 44 | 9 | 182,001 | 143,422 |
2004-06-01 | 3.05 | 61 | 20 | 792,823 | 988,646 |
2004-03-01 | 2.8929 | 81 | 28 | 4,910,140 | 2,307,595 |
2003-12-01 | 1.2857 | 36 | 28 | 174,893 | 398,578 |
2003-09-01 | 4.375 | 35 | 8 | 160,155 | 228,226 |
2003-06-01 | 12.0 | 12 | 1 | 124,861 | 47,000 |
2001-03-01 | 0.0625 | 1 | 16 | 2,213 | 528,013 |
2000-09-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 1,108,483 | 21,759 |
2000-06-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1,240 | 39,839 |
2000-03-01 | 0.0833 | 1 | 12 | 1,414 | 279,605 |
1999-03-01 | 0.1 | 1 | 10 | 938.00 | 289,815 |
1998-12-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 977.00 | 26,207 |
1998-03-01 | 0.1429 | 1 | 7 | 914.00 | 95,073 |
1997-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1,166 | 9,777 |
1997-03-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 1,463 | 46,670 |
1996-12-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 1,461 | 15,189 |
Ford Notable Stakeholders
A Ford stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Ford often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Ford's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Ford's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Mark Fields | CEO and President and Director | Profile | |
James Hackett | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
Anning Chen | President and Chief Executive Officer of Ford of China | Profile | |
Joy Falotico | Group Vice President – Chairman and CEO, Ford Motor Credit Co. | Profile | |
Bernard Silverstone | Group Vice President; Chairman and CEO of Ford Motor Credit Co. | Profile | |
Jon Huntsman | Vice Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
William Ford | Executive Chairman, Chairman of Fin. Committee and Member of Sustainability and Innovation Committee | Profile | |
Jeff Lemmer | Vice President COO - Information Technology | Profile | |
Trevor Worthington | Vice President - Global Product Development Operations & Vehicle Programs | Profile | |
Peter Fleet | Group Vice President and Presidentident - Asia Pacific | Profile | |
Bennie Fowler | Group Vice President - Quality and New model launch | Profile | |
Kumar Galhotra | Group Vice President - Lincoln and Chief Marketing Officer | Profile | |
Ken Washington | CTO, Vice President - Research and Advanced Engineering | Profile | |
Cathy OCallaghan | Vice President Controller | Profile | |
John Casesa | Group Vice President – Global Strategy | Profile | |
Ray Day | Group Vice President - Communications | Profile | |
Kimberly Pittel | Group Vice President - Sustainability, Environment and Safety Engineering | Profile | |
Steven Armstrong | Group Vice President and Presidentident - Europe, Middle East & Africa | Profile | |
David Schoch | Group Vice President and President Asia Pacific | Profile | |
Catherine OCallaghan | Vice President, Controller and Chief Financial Officer, Global Markets | Profile | |
Neil Schloss | Vice President CFO - Mobility | Profile | |
Marcy Klevorn | Vice President CIO | Profile | |
Bruce Hettle | Group Vice President – Manufacturing and Labor Affairs | Profile | |
Mark LaNeve | Vice president - U.S. Marketing, Sales and Service | Profile | |
Stuart Rowley | President of Ford of Europe | Profile | |
Musa Tariq | Vice President Chief Brand Officer | Profile | |
Sherif Marakby | Vice President - Autonomous Vehicles and Electrification | Profile | |
Paul Ballew | Vice President and Chief Data and Analytics Officer | Profile | |
Mark Truby | Vice President - Communications | Profile | |
Ziad Ojakli | Group Vice President - Government and Community Relations | Profile | |
Stephen Odell | Executive Vice President and President Europe, Middle East and Africa | Profile | |
Mark Ovenden | Vice President - Marketing, Sales and Service, Asia Pacific | Profile | |
John Lawler | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President | Profile | |
Kenneth Kent | Vice President Treasurer | Profile | |
Raj Nair | Group Vice President - Global Product Development | Profile | |
Felicia Fields | Group Vice President - Human Resources and Corporate Services | Profile | |
Kim Pittel | Group Vice President - Sustainability, Environment and Safety Engineering | Profile | |
Joseph Hinrichs | Executive VP and President of the Americas | Profile | |
James Farley | Executive VP and President of Europe, Middle East and Africa | Profile | |
John Fleming | Executive Vice President - Global Manufacturing and Labor Affairs | Profile | |
Linda Cash | Vice President - Quality and New Model Launch | Profile | |
Timothy Stone | Chief Financial Officer | Profile | |
Robert Shanks | CFO and Executive VP | Profile | |
Lynn Vojvodich | Independent Director | Profile | |
James Hance | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Weinberg | Independent Director | Profile | |
Edsel Ford | Director | Profile | |
Anthony Earley | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Ellen Marram | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
John Thornton | Independent Director | Profile | |
Gerald Shaheen | Independent Director | Profile | |
John May | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Lechleiter | Independent Director | Profile | |
Beth Mooney | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Veihmeyer | Independent Director | Profile | |
Stephen Butler | Independent Director | Profile | |
William Kennard | Independent Director | Profile | |
William Helman | Independent Director | Profile | |
Kimberly Casiano | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Mellen | General Counsel | Profile | |
Kenneth Washington | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Bradley Gayton | Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel | Profile | |
Alexandra English | Independent Director | Profile | |
Doug Field | Chief Advanced Technology and Embedded Systems Officer | Profile | |
Ambassador Huntsman | Vice Director | Profile | |
Lisa Materazzo | Global Officer | Profile | |
Ashwani Galhotra | President - Americas and International Markets Group | Profile | |
J Field | Chief Advanced Technology and Embedded Systems Officer | Profile | |
Henry Ford | Independent Director | Profile | |
Christopher Smith | Chief Government Affairs Officer | Profile | |
John Field | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Lynn Tyson | Executive Relations | Profile | |
Mark Kosman | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Kiersten Robinson | Chief People and Employee Experience Officer | Profile | |
Lynn Radakovich | Independent Director | Profile | |
Michael Amend | Chief Digital and Information Officer | Profile | |
Steven Croley | Chief Policy Officer and General Counsel | Profile | |
Cynthia Williams | Homologation Sustainability | Profile | |
Beth Rose | Ethics Compliance | Profile | |
Hau ThaiTang | Chief Product Development and Purchasing Officer | Profile |
About Ford Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Ford Motor often depends on how effective the management is. Ford management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Ford management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Ford management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for 2024 | ||
Return On Capital Employed | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
Return On Assets | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
Return On Equity | 0.10 | 0.11 |
The data published in Ford's official financial statements usually reflect Ford's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Ford Motor. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Ford accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Ford's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Automobiles space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Ford's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Ford's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Ford's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Ford Motor. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Ford's management manipulating its earnings.
Ford Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Ford use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Ford within its industry.Ford Manpower Efficiency
Return on Ford Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 995.4K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 2.2B | |
Net Income Per Employee | 24.5K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 54.1M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 112.7K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 249.4M |
Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Ford Motor. Also, note that the market value of any Company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in census. Note that the Ford Motor information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Ford's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Investing Opportunities module to build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences.
Complementary Tools for Ford Stock analysis
When running Ford's price analysis, check to measure Ford's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Ford is operating at the current time. Most of Ford's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Ford's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Ford's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Ford to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data | |
Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges |
Is Ford's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Ford. If investors know Ford will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Ford listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 1.938 | Dividend Share 0.6 | Earnings Share 1.08 | Revenue Per Share 44.07 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.045 |
The market value of Ford Motor is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Ford that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Ford's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Ford's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Ford's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Ford's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Ford's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Ford is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Ford's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.