Ford Company Top Insiders

F Stock  USD 12.06  0.02  0.17%   
Ford employs about 177 K people. The company is managed by 80 executives with a total tenure of roughly 625 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 2212.5 employees per reported executive. Examination of Ford's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
Mark Fields  CEO
CEO and President and Director
James Hackett  CEO
President, Chief Executive Officer, Director

Ford's Insider Buying Vs Selling

50

 
Selling
 
Buying

Latest Trades

2024-03-06Mark KosmanDisposed 26898 @ 12.53View
2023-12-08John Douglas FieldAcquired 182000 @ 11.05View
Monitoring Ford's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
  
Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Ford Motor. Also, note that the market value of any Company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in census.

Ford's latest congressional trading

Congressional trading in companies like Ford Motor, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Ford by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2023-08-16Representative Earl BlumenauerDisposed $15K to $50KVerify
2023-08-14Senator Thomas H TubervilleAcquired $100K to $250KVerify
2023-04-26Senator Tommy TubervilleAcquired $15K to $50KVerify
2022-06-16Senator Shelley Moore CapitoAcquired Under $15KVerify
2022-05-13Representative Ed PerlmutterDisposed Under $15KVerify
2021-10-06Representative Thomas SuozziDisposed $15K to $50KVerify
2020-11-12Representative Kenny MarchantDisposed $15K to $50KVerify
2020-10-09Representative Joe CourtneyDisposed Under $15KVerify
2020-09-16Representative Gilbert CisnerosAcquired Under $15KVerify
2020-08-11Senator Ron WydenAcquired $15K to $50KVerify
2020-07-24Representative Gus M. BilirakisDisposed Under $15KVerify
2020-04-02Representative Dean PhillipsAcquired Under $15KVerify
2019-02-22Representative Linda T. SanchezDisposed Under $15KVerify
2018-12-28Senator Sheldon WhitehouseAcquired Under $15KVerify
2018-09-18Representative Rodney Leland BlumAcquired $50K to $100KVerify
2018-07-30Representative Jackie SpeierDisposed Under $15KVerify
2017-05-15Senator John HoevenAcquired $100K to $250KVerify
2016-03-31Senator Bill CassidyAcquired Under $15KVerify
2016-03-31Senator William CassidyAcquired Under $15KVerify
2014-06-06Senator Pat RobertsAcquired Under $15KVerify

Ford Management Team Effectiveness

The company has return on total asset of 0.0127 % which means that for every 100 dollars spent on assets, it generated a profit of $0.0127. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.1007 %, implying that it made 0.1007 on every $100 invested by shareholders. Ford's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Ford manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Ford's Return On Assets are most likely to slightly decrease in the upcoming years. The Ford's current Return On Equity is estimated to increase to 0.11, while Return On Capital Employed is projected to decrease to 0.03. At this time, Ford's Asset Turnover is most likely to slightly decrease in the upcoming years.
The current Common Stock Shares Outstanding is estimated to decrease to about 2.7 B. The Ford's current Net Loss is estimated to increase to about (2.2 B)

Ford Workforce Comparison

Ford Motor is one of the top stocks in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Consumer Discretionary industry is currently estimated at about 262,775. Ford totals roughly 177,000 in number of employees claiming about 67% of stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.

Ford Profit Margins

The company has Profit Margin of 0.02 %, which indicates that it operates at a low-profit margin and even a small decline in sales will erase profits resulting in a net loss, or a negative margin. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin of (0.02) %, which implies that for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated an operating loss of $0.02.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Gross Profit Margin0.08710.0917
Notably Down
Slightly volatile
Operating Profit Margin0.02940.031
Notably Down
Pretty Stable

Ford Insider Trading History

Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Ford insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Ford's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Ford insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
 
Oil Shock
 
Dot-com Bubble
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
Buy/Sell Ratio# Purchases Trades# Sales TradesTotal Shares PurchasedTotal Shares Sold
2024-03-01
1.2941
66
51
 7,636,846 
 3,730,949 
2023-12-01
1.4286
30
21
 2,082,570 
 1,549,139 
2023-09-01
3.25
13
4
 379,185 
 34,869 
2023-06-01
3.2727
36
11
 1,989,928 
 891,755 
2023-03-01
1.25
60
48
 4,146,416 
 2,477,366 
2022-12-01
1.8182
20
11
 1,122,035 
 625,236 
2022-09-01
3.75
15
4
 2,651,001 
 2,650,129 
2022-06-01
1.7778
32
18
 911,636 
 342,162 
2022-03-01
1.375
66
48
 3,118,788 
 2,695,982 
2021-12-01
1.5833
38
24
 3,969,620 
 2,704,713 
2021-09-01
0.3333
2
6
 81,493 
 0.00 
2021-06-01
1.1176
19
17
 571,112 
 272,660 
2021-03-01
1.0833
78
72
 3,870,448 
 2,495,132 
2020-12-01
0.3158
6
19
 433,626 
 906,668 
2020-09-01
0.3889
7
18
 6,959,219 
 717,258 
2020-06-01
1.7692
23
13
 1,983,106 
 1,639,219 
2020-03-01
1.4167
68
48
 4,343,492 
 3,026,617 
2019-12-01
2.625
21
8
 140,861 
 131,792 
2019-09-01
3.6667
22
6
 895,316 
 100,000 
2019-06-01
2.5714
36
14
 593,440 
 774,557 
2019-03-01
1.3061
64
49
 3,884,470 
 1,636,545 
2018-12-01
1.8182
20
11
 1,434,510 
 1,521,180 
2018-09-01
20.0
20
1
 37,914 
 13,000 
2018-06-01
2.6
39
15
 483,266 
 339,591 
2018-03-01
1.4306
103
72
 5,522,730 
 3,177,312 
2017-12-01
1.1905
25
21
 1,198,998 
 1,387,011 
2017-09-01
1.5714
22
14
 511,922 
 385,829 
2017-06-01
2.6875
43
16
 2,796,905 
 531,591 
2017-03-01
0.8881
119
134
 4,625,687 
 4,188,805 
2016-12-01
1.8462
24
13
 55,048 
 170,877 
2016-06-01
2.5
35
14
 1,382,924 
 2,202,077 
2016-03-01
1.1
88
80
 6,707,149 
 7,707,195 
2015-12-01
7.6667
23
3
 13,823 
 1,000.00 
2015-09-01
8.3333
25
3
 54,268 
 143,479 
2015-06-01
7.6
38
5
 197,679 
 180,044 
2015-03-01
1.5763
93
59
 4,943,864 
 2,953,919 
2014-12-01
8.6667
26
3
 30,351 
 34,000 
2014-09-01
1.8182
40
22
 1,346,468 
 1,279,965 
2014-06-01
2.5
35
14
 774,893 
 1,362,181 
2014-03-01
1.6875
81
48
 8,085,230 
 3,092,986 
2013-12-01
4.7143
33
7
 104,925 
 98,422 
2013-09-01
0.9828
57
58
 4,822,328 
 9,415,873 
2013-06-01
1.6154
42
26
 4,230,025 
 4,682,181 
2013-03-01
1.439
118
82
 7,026,174 
 3,374,563 
2012-12-01
1.6667
40
24
 527,724 
 795,595 
2012-09-01
3.0
36
12
 2,337,305 
 3,372,589 
2012-06-01
10.3333
31
3
 270,557 
 215,022 
2012-03-01
1.717
91
53
 14,216,569 
 13,352,485 
2011-12-01
5.6667
17
3
 206,762 
 248,897 
2011-09-01
3.1667
19
6
 552,976 
 457,942 
2011-06-01
1.1
22
20
 549,782 
 1,007,893 
2011-03-01
1.2045
106
88
 15,310,051 
 7,859,955 
2010-12-01
0.8358
56
67
 2,522,408 
 4,944,005 
2010-09-01
1.2381
26
21
 6,257,638 
 5,517,854 
2010-06-01
1.5385
20
13
 759,780 
 1,457,157 
2010-03-01
1.8235
93
51
 13,918,443 
 366,209,795 
2009-12-01
1.8571
13
7
 49,908 
 250,837 
2009-09-01
2.4
12
5
 39,876 
 219,141 
2009-06-01
6.5
13
2
 55,529 
 18,595 
2009-03-01
1.6038
85
53
 17,710,476 
 1,114,059 
2008-12-01
4.0
20
5
 216,995 
 37,021 
2008-09-01
2.1667
13
6
 115,833 
 1,223,507 
2008-06-01
1.0
14
14
 119,474 
 211,919 
2008-03-01
1.6522
76
46
 9,073,774 
 1,189,898 
2007-12-01
5.0
15
3
 249,193 
 7,467 
2007-09-01
5.0
15
3
 312,035 
 266,216 
2007-06-01
6.5
13
2
 34,742 
 13,519 
2007-03-01
1.463
79
54
 10,762,103 
 2,035,396 
2006-12-01
2.2
11
5
 40,708 
 22,326 
2006-09-01
2.5455
28
11
 56,152 
 140,848 
2006-06-01
2.9091
32
11
 144,739 
 111,797 
2006-03-01
1.6034
93
58
 4,797,403 
 1,645,860 
2005-12-01
2.5833
31
12
 86,378 
 16,665 
2005-09-01
4.5714
32
7
 80,993 
 59,609 
2005-06-01
1.3448
39
29
 374,980 
 248,601 
2005-03-01
1.6739
77
46
 6,250,740 
 2,602,055 
2004-12-01
3.0769
40
13
 183,132 
 258,787 
2004-09-01
4.8889
44
9
 182,001 
 143,422 
2004-06-01
3.05
61
20
 792,823 
 988,646 
2004-03-01
2.8929
81
28
 4,910,140 
 2,307,595 
2003-12-01
1.2857
36
28
 174,893 
 398,578 
2003-09-01
4.375
35
8
 160,155 
 228,226 
2003-06-01
12.0
12
1
 124,861 
 47,000 
2001-03-01
0.0625
1
16
 2,213 
 528,013 
2000-09-01
2.0
2
1
 1,108,483 
 21,759 
2000-06-01
1.0
1
1
 1,240 
 39,839 
2000-03-01
0.0833
1
12
 1,414 
 279,605 
1999-03-01
0.1
1
10
 938.00 
 289,815 
1998-12-01
1.0
1
1
 977.00 
 26,207 
1998-03-01
0.1429
1
7
 914.00 
 95,073 
1997-09-01
1.0
1
1
 1,166 
 9,777 
1997-03-01
0.25
1
4
 1,463 
 46,670 
1996-12-01
0.5
1
2
 1,461 
 15,189 

Ford Notable Stakeholders

A Ford stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Ford often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Ford's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Ford's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Mark FieldsCEO and President and DirectorProfile
James HackettPresident, Chief Executive Officer, DirectorProfile
Anning ChenPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Ford of ChinaProfile
Joy FaloticoGroup Vice President – Chairman and CEO, Ford Motor Credit Co.Profile
Bernard SilverstoneGroup Vice President; Chairman and CEO of Ford Motor Credit Co.Profile
Jon HuntsmanVice Chairman of the BoardProfile
William FordExecutive Chairman, Chairman of Fin. Committee and Member of Sustainability and Innovation CommitteeProfile
Jeff LemmerVice President COO - Information TechnologyProfile
Trevor WorthingtonVice President - Global Product Development Operations & Vehicle ProgramsProfile
Peter FleetGroup Vice President and Presidentident - Asia PacificProfile
Bennie FowlerGroup Vice President - Quality and New model launchProfile
Kumar GalhotraGroup Vice President - Lincoln and Chief Marketing OfficerProfile
Ken WashingtonCTO, Vice President - Research and Advanced EngineeringProfile
Cathy OCallaghanVice President ControllerProfile
John CasesaGroup Vice President – Global StrategyProfile
Ray DayGroup Vice President - CommunicationsProfile
Kimberly PittelGroup Vice President - Sustainability, Environment and Safety EngineeringProfile
Steven ArmstrongGroup Vice President and Presidentident - Europe, Middle East & AfricaProfile
David SchochGroup Vice President and President Asia PacificProfile
Catherine OCallaghanVice President, Controller and Chief Financial Officer, Global MarketsProfile
Neil SchlossVice President CFO - MobilityProfile
Marcy KlevornVice President CIOProfile
Bruce HettleGroup Vice President – Manufacturing and Labor AffairsProfile
Mark LaNeveVice president - U.S. Marketing, Sales and ServiceProfile
Stuart RowleyPresident of Ford of EuropeProfile
Musa TariqVice President Chief Brand OfficerProfile
Sherif MarakbyVice President - Autonomous Vehicles and ElectrificationProfile
Paul BallewVice President and Chief Data and Analytics OfficerProfile
Mark TrubyVice President - CommunicationsProfile
Ziad OjakliGroup Vice President - Government and Community RelationsProfile
Stephen OdellExecutive Vice President and President Europe, Middle East and AfricaProfile
Mark OvendenVice President - Marketing, Sales and Service, Asia PacificProfile
John LawlerChief Financial Officer, Vice PresidentProfile
Kenneth KentVice President TreasurerProfile
Raj NairGroup Vice President - Global Product DevelopmentProfile
Felicia FieldsGroup Vice President - Human Resources and Corporate ServicesProfile
Kim PittelGroup Vice President - Sustainability, Environment and Safety EngineeringProfile
Joseph HinrichsExecutive VP and President of the AmericasProfile
James FarleyExecutive VP and President of Europe, Middle East and AfricaProfile
John FlemingExecutive Vice President - Global Manufacturing and Labor AffairsProfile
Linda CashVice President - Quality and New Model LaunchProfile
Timothy StoneChief Financial OfficerProfile
Robert ShanksCFO and Executive VPProfile
Lynn VojvodichIndependent DirectorProfile
James HanceIndependent DirectorProfile
John WeinbergIndependent DirectorProfile
Edsel FordDirectorProfile
Anthony EarleyLead Independent DirectorProfile
Ellen MarramLead Independent DirectorProfile
John ThorntonIndependent DirectorProfile
Gerald ShaheenIndependent DirectorProfile
John MayIndependent DirectorProfile
John LechleiterIndependent DirectorProfile
Beth MooneyIndependent DirectorProfile
John VeihmeyerIndependent DirectorProfile
Stephen ButlerIndependent DirectorProfile
William KennardIndependent DirectorProfile
William HelmanIndependent DirectorProfile
Kimberly CasianoIndependent DirectorProfile
John MellenGeneral CounselProfile
Kenneth WashingtonChief OfficerProfile
Bradley GaytonChief Administrative Officer, General CounselProfile
Alexandra EnglishIndependent DirectorProfile
Doug FieldChief Advanced Technology and Embedded Systems OfficerProfile
Ambassador HuntsmanVice DirectorProfile
Lisa MaterazzoGlobal OfficerProfile
Ashwani GalhotraPresident - Americas and International Markets GroupProfile
J FieldChief Advanced Technology and Embedded Systems OfficerProfile
Henry FordIndependent DirectorProfile
Christopher SmithChief Government Affairs OfficerProfile
John FieldChief OfficerProfile
Lynn TysonExecutive RelationsProfile
Mark KosmanChief OfficerProfile
Kiersten RobinsonChief People and Employee Experience OfficerProfile
Lynn RadakovichIndependent DirectorProfile
Michael AmendChief Digital and Information OfficerProfile
Steven CroleyChief Policy Officer and General CounselProfile
Cynthia WilliamsHomologation SustainabilityProfile
Beth RoseEthics ComplianceProfile
Hau ThaiTangChief Product Development and Purchasing OfficerProfile

About Ford Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as Ford Motor often depends on how effective the management is. Ford management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Ford management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Ford management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last ReportedProjected for 2024
Return On Capital Employed 0.03  0.03 
Return On Assets 0.02  0.02 
Return On Equity 0.10  0.11 
The data published in Ford's official financial statements usually reflect Ford's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Ford Motor. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Ford accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Ford's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Automobiles space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Ford's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Ford's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Ford's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Ford Motor. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Ford's management manipulating its earnings.

Ford Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as Ford use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Ford within its industry.

Ford Manpower Efficiency

Return on Ford Manpower

Revenue Per Employee995.4K
Revenue Per Executive2.2B
Net Income Per Employee24.5K
Net Income Per Executive54.1M
Working Capital Per Employee112.7K
Working Capital Per Executive249.4M
When determining whether Ford Motor is a strong investment it is important to analyze Ford's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Ford's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Ford Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Ford Motor. Also, note that the market value of any Company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in census.
Note that the Ford Motor information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Ford's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Investing Opportunities module to build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences.

Complementary Tools for Ford Stock analysis

When running Ford's price analysis, check to measure Ford's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Ford is operating at the current time. Most of Ford's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Ford's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Ford's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Ford to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Is Ford's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Ford. If investors know Ford will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Ford listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
1.938
Dividend Share
0.6
Earnings Share
1.08
Revenue Per Share
44.07
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.045
The market value of Ford Motor is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Ford that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Ford's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Ford's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Ford's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Ford's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Ford's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Ford is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Ford's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.