Correlation Between GM and Citigroup

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Citigroup at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Citigroup into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Citigroup, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Citigroup and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Citigroup. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Citigroup.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Citigroup

0.94
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Citigroup is 0.94. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Citigroup in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Citigroup and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Citigroup. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Citigroup has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Citigroup go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Citigroup

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to under-perform the Citigroup. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, General Motors is 1.22 times less risky than Citigroup. The stock trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Citigroup is currently generating about 0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,095  in Citigroup on January 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding Citigroup or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Citigroup

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Citigroup Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Citigroup

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Citigroup positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Citigroup can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Citigroup will offset losses from the drop in Citigroup's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Citigroup pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios