Intel (Mexico) Insiders
| INTC Stock | MXN 582.28 6.73 1.14% |
Intel employs about 131.9 K people. The company is managed by 53 executives with a total tenure of roughly 385 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 2488.68 employees per reported executive. Break down of Intel's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
| Patrick Gelsinger CEO Chief Executive Officer |
| Brian Krzanich CEO CEO, Director and Member of Executive Committee |
Intel |
Intel Management Team Effectiveness
Intel's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Intel manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Intel Workforce Comparison
Intel is rated second overall in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Semiconductors industry is currently estimated at about 296,831. Intel totals roughly 131,900 in number of employees claiming about 44% of equities listed under Semiconductors industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.13 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.04 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.04. Intel Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Intel Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Intel price series and its benchmark/peer.
Intel Notable Stakeholders
An Intel stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Intel often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Intel's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Intel's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Patrick Gelsinger | Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Brian Krzanich | CEO, Director and Member of Executive Committee | Profile | |
| Robert Swan | Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
| Omar Ishrak | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Matthew Smith | Chief Human Resource Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
| Michelle Holthaus | Senior Vice President and General Manager - Sales and Marketing Group, Interim Chief Marketing Officer | Profile | |
| Allon Stabinsky | Senior Vice President and Chief Deputy General Counsel, Law and Policy Group | Profile | |
| Leslie Culbertson | Executive Vice President, General Manager - Product Assurance and Security | Profile | |
| Paul Vaccaro | Senior Vice President - Operations and Engineering | Profile | |
| Michael Mayberry | Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer nd General Manager of Technology Development | Profile | |
| Daniel McNamara | Senior Vice President and General Manager - Programmable Solutions Group | Profile | |
| Ann Kelleher | Senior Vice President, General Manager of Manufacturing and Operations | Profile | |
| George Davis | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Navin Shenoy | Executive Vice President, General Manager - Data Center Group | Profile | |
| Gregory Bryant | Executive Vice President, General Manager - Client Computing Group | Profile | |
| Venkata Renduchintala | Executive Vice President; Group President, Technology, Systems Architecture and Client Group; Chief Engineering Officer | Profile | |
| Sandra Rivera | Chief People Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Todd Underwood | Interim CFO, Vice President - Finance and Director, Corporate Planning and Reporting | Profile | |
| Gregory Pearson | Senior Vice President General Manager - Sales and Marketing Group | Profile | |
| Steven Rodgers | Executive Vice President, General Counsel | Profile | |
| William Holt | Executive VP and General Manager of Technology and Manufacturing Group | Profile | |
| Robert Stein | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Andrew Bryant | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
| Andrew Wilson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Stacy Smith | CFO, Executive VP and Director of Corporate Strategy | Profile | |
| Susan Decker | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
| TsuJae Liu | Independent Director | Profile | |
| James Goetz | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Charlene Barshefsky | Independent Director | Profile | |
| David Pottruck | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Gregory Smith | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Aneel Bhusri | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
| Risa LavizzoMourey | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Reed Hundt | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Frank Yeary | Independent Director | Profile | |
| John Donahoe | Independent Director | Profile | |
| James Plummer | Independent Director | Profile | |
| David Yoffie | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Keyvan Esfarjani | Chief VP | Profile | |
| Kevin McBride | Principal Accounting Officer | Profile | |
| David Zinsner | Ex CFO | Profile | |
| Safroadu YeboahAmankwah | Senior Vice President Chief Strategy Officer | Profile | |
| Sunil Shenoy | Senior Vice President General Manager - Design Engineering Group | Profile | |
| Jo Levy | Chief Group | Profile | |
| Geoff Vaughan | Vice President - Operations | Profile | |
| April Boise | Ex Officer | Profile | |
| Greg Lavender | VP, CTO | Profile | |
| Scott Gawel | Co Officer | Profile | |
| Dion Weisler | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Aicha Evans | Chief Strategy Officer | Profile | |
| Sharon Heck | Corporate Vice President Treasurer, Chief Tax Officer | Profile | |
| Alyssa Henry | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Christoph Schell | Chief VP | Profile |
About Intel Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Intel often depends on how effective the management is. Intel management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Intel management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Intel management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Intel Corporation designs, manufactures, and sells essential technologies for the cloud, smart, and connected devices for retail, industrial, and consumer uses worldwide. The company was founded in 1968 and is headquartered in Santa Clara, California. INTEL CORP operates under Semiconductors classification in Mexico and is traded on Mexico Stock Exchange. It employs 113700 people.
The data published in Intel's official financial statements usually reflect Intel's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Intel. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Intel accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Intel's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Technology space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Intel's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Intel's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Intel's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Intel. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Intel's management manipulating its earnings.
Intel Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Intel use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Intel within its industry.Intel Manpower Efficiency
Return on Intel Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 478K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 1.2B | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 60.8K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 151.2M |
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Intel. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors. For more information on how to buy Intel Stock please use our How to Invest in Intel guide.You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..
Complementary Tools for Intel Stock analysis
When running Intel's price analysis, check to measure Intel's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Intel is operating at the current time. Most of Intel's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Intel's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Intel's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Intel to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
| Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
| Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
| Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
| Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
| Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
| Global Markets Map Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes | |
| Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
| Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
| Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
| Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios |