Correlation Between Loomis Sayles and Sierra Core

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Loomis Sayles and Sierra Core at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Loomis Sayles and Sierra Core into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Loomis Sayles Bond and Sierra E Retirement, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Loomis Sayles and Sierra Core and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Loomis Sayles with a short position of Sierra Core. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Loomis Sayles and Sierra Core.

Diversification Opportunities for Loomis Sayles and Sierra Core

0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Loomis and Sierra is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Loomis Sayles Bond and Sierra E Retirement in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sierra E Retirement and Loomis Sayles is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Loomis Sayles Bond are associated (or correlated) with Sierra Core. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sierra E Retirement has no effect on the direction of Loomis Sayles i.e., Loomis Sayles and Sierra Core go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Loomis Sayles and Sierra Core

Assuming the 90 days horizon Loomis Sayles Bond is expected to under-perform the Sierra Core. In addition to that, Loomis Sayles is 1.05 times more volatile than Sierra E Retirement. It trades about -0.26 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Sierra E Retirement is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,216  in Sierra E Retirement on January 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (31.00) from holding Sierra E Retirement or give up 1.4% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Loomis Sayles Bond  vs.  Sierra E Retirement

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Loomis Sayles Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Loomis Sayles Bond has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Loomis Sayles is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Sierra E Retirement 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sierra E Retirement are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Sierra Core is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Loomis Sayles and Sierra Core Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Loomis Sayles and Sierra Core

The main advantage of trading using opposite Loomis Sayles and Sierra Core positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Loomis Sayles position performs unexpectedly, Sierra Core can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sierra Core will offset losses from the drop in Sierra Core's long position.
The idea behind Loomis Sayles Bond and Sierra E Retirement pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume