MetLife Management Performance

Analysis of MetLife manpower and management performance can provide insight into MetLife stock performance. Also an employee sentiment is becoming a valuable factor that investors can use to determine the amount of risk that may be associated with MetLife Inc future performance. Please see also Stocks Correlation.

MetLife Management Effectiveness

The company has Return on Asset of (0.14) % which means that on every $100 spent on asset it lost $0.14. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows return on shareholders equity (ROE) of (1.23) % meaning that it generated no profit with money invested by stockholders.

MetLife Profit Margins

The company has Net Profit Margin of (0.74) % which means that it does not effectively controls expenditures or properly executes on its pricing strategies. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of (2.96) % which entails that for every $100 of revenue it lost -0.03.

MetLife Insider Trading

MetLife Stakeholders

Steven Kandarian Chairman of the Board and Presidentident, CEO, MBA
Michel Khalaf President EMEA
William ODonnell Executive Vice President Chief Accounting Officer
Maria Morris Executive Vice President Head - Global Employee Benefits
Susan Podlogar Chief Human Resource Officer, Executive Vice President
Esther Lee Executive Vice President Global Chief Marketing Officer
Frans Hijkoop Chief Human Resource Officer, Executive Vice President
Christopher Townsend President of Asia
Ricardo Anzaldua Executive Vice President General Counsel
Marlene Debel Executive Vice President Treasurer
John Hele CFO and Executive VP
Martin Lippert Executive VP of Global Technology and Operations
Steven Goulart Chief Investment Officer and Executive VP
Catherine Kinney Independent Director
Carlos Gutierrez Director
Alfred Kelly Independent Director, MBA
Cheryl Grise Lead Independent Director
Kenton Sicchitano Independent Director, MBA
Robert Hubbard Independent Director, Ph.D
William Kennard Director, MBA
David Herzog Director, CPA
James Kilts Independent Director, MBA
Edward Kelly Independent Director
Denise Morrison Independent Director
Lulu Wang Independent Director, MBA
Glenn Hubbard Lead Independent Director
Kirstie Traas Head of Operations

Leadership

MetLife Top Executives
Steven Kandarian  Chairman
Chairman of the Board and Presidentident, CEO
Michel Khalaf  President
President EMEA

Tenure Analysis

MetLife Employment Tenure
MetLife employes about 69000 people. The company is managed by 27 executives with total tenure of roughly 124 years, averanging almost 4.0 years of service per executive having 2555.0 employee per reported executive.

Earnings

MetLife Earnings Estimates
EPSEstimate Date
Quarterly Estimate1.29May 3, 2017
MetLife Inc normalized analysts earnings estimates for actual as well as projected forward EPS values taken as an average expert opinion over time
Earnings Estimate  

Manpower Efficiency

Return on MetLife Manpower
Revenue Per Employee 1.1 M
Revenue Per Executive 2.3 B
Net Income Per Employee 89.3 K
Net Loss Per Executive 35.3 M

Per Employee

MetLife Per Employee Growth Over Time

Net Income Per Employee

Revenue Per Employee

Number of Employees

MetLife Number of Employees Analysis
MetLife Inc is considered to be number one stock in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Insurance - General industry is now estimated at about 114,742. MetLife totals roughly 69,000 in number of employees claiming about 60% of equities under Insurance - General industry.

Earnings Per Share

MetLife Inc Earnings Per Share
According to company disclosure MetLife Inc has Earnings Per Share of -0.52 times. This is 122.61% lower than that of the Services sector, and significantly lower than that of Insurance - General industry, The Earnings Per Share for all stocks is 122.61% higher than the company.
Earnings per Share is one of the most important measures of the current share price of a firm, and is used by investors to determine the company overall profitability; especially when it is compared to the EPS of similar companies.