Microsoft (Brazil) Top Management
| MSFT34 Stock | BRL 87.45 0.16 0.18% |
Microsoft employs about 221 K people. The company is managed by 34 executives with a total tenure of roughly 262 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 6500.0 employees per reported executive. Analysis of Microsoft's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
| Satya Nadella CEO CEO and Director |
| John Thompson Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
Microsoft |
Microsoft Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1483 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1483 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3931 %, meaning that it generated $0.3931 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Microsoft Workforce Comparison
Microsoft is considered to be number one stock in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Software - Infrastructure industry is now estimated at about 599,255. Microsoft totals roughly 221,000 in number of employees claiming about 37% of equities listed under Software - Infrastructure industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.33 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.41 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.41. Microsoft Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Microsoft Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Microsoft price series and its benchmark/peer.
Microsoft Notable Stakeholders
A Microsoft stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Microsoft often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Microsoft's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Microsoft's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Satya Nadella | CEO and Director | Profile | |
| John Thompson | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Sean Ventura | Vice President - Information Security, Chief Information Security Officer | Profile | |
| JeanPhilippe Courtois | Executive Vice President and President - Microsoft Global Sales, Marketing and Operations | Profile | |
| Christopher Capossela | Executive Vice President Chief Marketing Officer | Profile | |
| Margaret Johnson | Executive Vice President - Business Development | Profile | |
| Bradford Smith | Executive Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
| Keith Lorizio | Vice President - North America Sales | Profile | |
| Kathleen Hogan | Executive Vice President - Human Resources | Profile | |
| Amy Hood | CFO and Executive VP | Profile | |
| Brian Turner | COO | Profile | |
| Kevin Scott | CTO | Profile | |
| Ifeanyi Amah | CTO | Profile | |
| Charles Scharf | Director | Profile | |
| Helmut Panke | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Penny Pritzker | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Sandra Peterson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Teri ListStoll | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Charles Noski | Independent Director | Profile | |
| William Gates | Founder and Technology Advisor, Director | Profile | |
| Mason Morfit | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Padmasree Warrior | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Hugh Johnston | Director | Profile | |
| Arne Sorenson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| John Stanton | Director | Profile | |
| Reid Hoffman | Director | Profile | |
| Bradford LCA | Pres Chairman | Profile | |
| Christopher Young | Strategy Devel | Profile | |
| Chris Suh | General Manager - Investor Relations | Profile | |
| Judson Althoff | Ex Officer | Profile | |
| Frank Shaw | Corp Communications | Profile | |
| Brett Iversen | Gen Relations | Profile | |
| Keith Esq | Deputy VP | Profile | |
| Alice Jolla | Co Officer | Profile |
About Microsoft Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Microsoft often depends on how effective the management is. Microsoft management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Microsoft management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Microsoft management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Microsoft Corporation develops, licenses, and supports software, services, devices, and solutions worldwide. The company was founded in 1975 and is headquartered in Redmond, Washington. MICROSOFT DRN operates under Software - Infrastructure classification in Brazil and is traded on Sao Paolo Stock Exchange.
The data published in Microsoft's official financial statements usually reflect Microsoft's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Microsoft. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Microsoft accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Microsoft's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Technology space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Microsoft's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Microsoft's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Microsoft's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Microsoft. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Microsoft's management manipulating its earnings.
Microsoft Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Microsoft use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Microsoft within its industry.Microsoft Manpower Efficiency
Return on Microsoft Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 897.1K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 5.8B | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 329.1K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 2.1B |
Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Microsoft. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in nation. For information on how to trade Microsoft Stock refer to our How to Trade Microsoft Stock guide.Note that the Microsoft information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Microsoft's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.
Complementary Tools for Microsoft Stock analysis
When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
| Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators | |
| USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
| Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
| Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
| Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
| Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
| Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
| Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
| Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities |