Welcome to Macroaxis
Sign in to go to your portfolios
Don't have an account? Create It
  Macroaxis: Personalized Investing   The proven technology to invest wisely
Macroaxis Country Selector USA  Change      Macroaxis User Registration Register    Macroaxis User Login Sign In
   
  
 
US Market Closed: May 26, 20:32 PM 2012  
FNMFO KDDIF 096770 AMKBF CTGBZ AU 
 
 
  NYSE  7,534  18.032  Index Moved Down 



Processing
Collecting data for RDEN and CL ...

Asset Comparison and Correlation

    
       
Investment horizon: 
30 Days (Login to change)
       
 
    
 Elizabeth Arden Inc.  and   ColgatePalmolive Co.
Check Correlation Matrix  
Daily Returns (%)
RDEN  CL  
Timeline
Given investment horizon of 30 days, Elizabeth Arden Inc. is expected to under-perform the ColgatePalmolive. In addition to that, Elizabeth is 2.04 times more volatile than ColgatePalmolive. It trades about -0.32 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. ColgatePalmolive is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 9,838 in ColgatePalmolive on April 26, 2012 and sell it today you would earn a total of 42.00 from holding ColgatePalmolive or generate 0.43% return on investment over 30 days.

Diversification

Weak diversification
Overlapping area represents amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Elizabeth Arden Inc. and ColgatePalmolive Co. in the same portfolio (assuming nothing else is changed)

Correlation Coefficient

0.3
 Parameters
Time Period1 Month [change]
DirectionPositive CL Moved Up vs RDEN
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns
    
Follow Correlation between RDEN and CL with your standard RSS feed, custom widget, or your favorite social app
Add To Reader
 
Add Correlation between RDEN and CL to your reader
 
Get social with Correlation between RDEN and CL
 Share Correlation between RDEN and CL 
Share Share Correlation between RDEN and CL
    
    
 
       
Predicted Return Density
Expected Daily Returns   
RDEN  CL  

Elizabeth Arden Inc.

 
    
    
Elizabeth
Performance
0
Out Of
100
Over 30
Days
Over the last 30 days Elizabeth Arden Inc. has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions.
    
    
Procter & Gamble vs. Elizabeth Arden Inc.
ColgatePalmolive vs. Elizabeth Arden Inc.
KimberlyClark Corporation vs. Elizabeth Arden Inc.
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. vs. Elizabeth Arden Inc.
Avon Products Inc. vs. Elizabeth Arden Inc.
Energizer Holdings Inc. vs. Elizabeth Arden Inc.
  

ColgatePalmolive

 
    
    
ColgatePalmolive
Performance
0
Out Of
100
Over 30
Days
Over the last 30 days ColgatePalmolive has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions.
    
    
Procter & Gamble vs. ColgatePalmolive
KimberlyClark Corporation vs. ColgatePalmolive
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. vs. ColgatePalmolive
Avon Products Inc. vs. ColgatePalmolive
Energizer Holdings Inc. vs. ColgatePalmolive
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. vs. ColgatePalmolive
       


 

 
Analytics
Investor Landscape
Efficient Frontier
Market Correlation
Risk and Return Analysis
Financial Content
Portfolio Projections
Portfolio Backtesting
Tools
FAQs
Retirement Optimizer
RSS and Mobile Access
Company Directory
Advisor Directory
Insider Directory
Wealth Management
About Us
About Macroaxis
Contact Us
Terms Of Use
Privacy Policy
Custom Reporting
Product Tour
More ROI Custom Reporting