Welcome to Macroaxis
Sign in to go to your portfolios
Don't have an account? Create It
  Macroaxis: Personalized Investing   The proven technology to invest wisely
Macroaxis Country Selector USA  Change      Macroaxis User Registration Register    Macroaxis User Login Sign In
   



Processing
Collecting data for RDEN and EL ...

Asset Comparison and Correlation

    
       
Investment horizon: 
30 Days (Login to change)
       
 
    
 Elizabeth Arden Inc.  and   Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Check Correlation Matrix  
Daily Returns (%)
RDEN  EL  
Timeline
Given investment horizon of 30 days, Elizabeth Arden Inc. is expected to generate 1.01 times more return on investment than Estee. However, Elizabeth is 1.01 times more volatile than Estee Lauder Companies Inc.. It trades about -0.32 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Estee Lauder Companies Inc. is currently generating about -0.46 per unit of risk. If you would invest 3,948 in Elizabeth Arden Inc. on April 26, 2012 and sell it today you would lose (426.00) from holding Elizabeth Arden Inc. or give up 10.79% of portfolio value over 30 days.

Diversification

Weak diversification
Overlapping area represents amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Elizabeth Arden Inc. and Estee Lauder Companies Inc. in the same portfolio (assuming nothing else is changed)

Correlation Coefficient

0.37
 Parameters
Time Period1 Month [change]
DirectionPositive EL Moved Up vs RDEN
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns
    
Follow Correlation between RDEN and EL with your standard RSS feed, custom widget, or your favorite social app
Add To Reader
 
Add Correlation between RDEN and EL to your reader
 
Get social with Correlation between RDEN and EL
 Share Correlation between RDEN and EL 
Share Share Correlation between RDEN and EL
    
    
 
       
Predicted Return Density
Expected Daily Returns   
RDEN  EL  

Elizabeth Arden Inc.

 
    
    
Elizabeth
Performance
0
Out Of
100
Over 30
Days
Over the last 30 days Elizabeth Arden Inc. has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions.
    
    
Procter & Gamble vs. Elizabeth Arden Inc.
ColgatePalmolive vs. Elizabeth Arden Inc.
KimberlyClark Corporation vs. Elizabeth Arden Inc.
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. vs. Elizabeth Arden Inc.
Avon Products Inc. vs. Elizabeth Arden Inc.
Energizer Holdings Inc. vs. Elizabeth Arden Inc.
  

Estee Lauder Companies Inc.

 
    
    
Estee
Performance
0
Out Of
100
Over 30
Days
Over the last 30 days Estee Lauder Companies Inc. has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions.
    
    
Procter & Gamble vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
ColgatePalmolive vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
KimberlyClark Corporation vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Avon Products Inc. vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Energizer Holdings Inc. vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. vs. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
       


 

 
Analytics
Investor Landscape
Efficient Frontier
Market Correlation
Risk and Return Analysis
Financial Content
Portfolio Projections
Portfolio Backtesting
Tools
FAQs
Retirement Optimizer
RSS and Mobile Access
Company Directory
Advisor Directory
Insider Directory
Wealth Management
About Us
About Macroaxis
Contact Us
Terms Of Use
Privacy Policy
Custom Reporting
Product Tour
More ROI Custom Reporting