Snap On Company Insiders
SNA Stock | USD 261.76 21.74 7.67% |
Snap On's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Snap On stock suggests that vertually all insiders are panicking at this time. Snap On employs about 13.2 K people. The company is managed by 32 executives with a total tenure of roughly 316 years, averaging almost 9.0 years of service per executive, having 412.5 employees per reported executive.
Nicholas Pinchuk Chairman Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer |
Iain Boyd President Vice President - Operations Development |
Snap On's Insider Buying Vs Selling
0
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-03-28 | Richard Thomas Miller | Disposed 704 @ 298.16 | View | ||
2024-03-19 | Nicholas T Pinchuk | Disposed 23514 @ 287.48 | View | ||
2024-03-04 | Anup R Banerjee | Disposed 12397 @ 283.13 | View | ||
2024-02-27 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 7522 @ 271.94 | View | ||
2024-02-23 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 3231 @ 270.58 | View | ||
2023-12-26 | Thomas J Ward | Disposed 1435 @ 289.91 | View | ||
2023-12-20 | Thomas J Ward | Disposed 5921 @ 289.52 | View | ||
2023-12-14 | Thomas J Ward | Disposed 36780 @ 289.47 | View | ||
2023-12-12 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 6769 @ 280.68 | View | ||
2023-12-04 | Nicholas T Pinchuk | Disposed 21493 @ 279.4 | View | ||
2023-11-30 | June C Lemerand | Disposed 3600 @ 273.38 | View | ||
2023-09-19 | Nicholas T Pinchuk | Disposed 22078 @ 258.16 | View | ||
2023-09-12 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 4842 @ 262.13 | View | ||
2023-07-11 | Timothy L Chambers | Disposed 4680 @ 289.29 | View | ||
2023-06-30 | Timothy L Chambers | Disposed 4598 @ 289.07 | View | ||
2023-06-15 | Iain Boyd | Disposed 8010 @ 274.31 | View | ||
2023-06-13 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 4108 @ 271.11 | View | ||
2023-06-01 | Nicholas T Pinchuk | Disposed 22348 @ 249.48 | View |
Monitoring Snap On's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Snap |
Snap On's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Snap On's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Snap will maintain a workforce of about 13200 employees by May 2024.Snap On's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Snap On, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Snap On by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2022-03-30 | Senator Tommy Tuberville | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-02-05 | Representative Greg Gianforte | Disposed $100K to $250K | Verify | ||
2017-06-15 | Senator Susan M. Collins | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2014-07-23 | Senator Susan M Collins | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Snap On Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.1161 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.1161 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.2156 %, implying that it generated $0.2156 on every 100 dollars invested. Snap On's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Snap On manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of April 19, 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is expected to decline to 0.08. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is expected to decline to 0.18. At present, Snap On's Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Current Assets Total is expected to grow to about 4.1 B, whereas Non Currrent Assets Other are forecasted to decline to about 92.2 M.The current year's Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to grow to about 1.1 B, whereas Common Stock Shares Outstanding is forecasted to decline to about 47.5 M.
Snap On Workforce Comparison
Snap On is rated third in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Industrials industry is at this time estimated at about 128,489. Snap On retains roughly 13,200 in number of employees claiming about 10% of equities under Industrials industry.
Snap On Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.2 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.26 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.26 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.54 | 0.56 |
|
| |||||
Net Profit Margin | 0.19 | 0.18 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.25 | 0.24 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.25 | 0.24 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.0686 | 0.12 |
|
| |||||
Return On Equity | 0.12 | 0.18 |
|
|
Snap On Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Snap On insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Snap On's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Snap On insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-03-01 | 1.3051 | 77 | 59 | 317,557 | 248,910 |
2023-12-01 | 0.44 | 11 | 25 | 106,919 | 199,494 |
2023-09-01 | 0.4286 | 6 | 14 | 58,769 | 99,282 |
2023-06-01 | 0.3333 | 12 | 36 | 94,515 | 179,631 |
2023-03-01 | 1.3585 | 72 | 53 | 289,258 | 272,374 |
2022-12-01 | 0.3125 | 5 | 16 | 71,056 | 119,588 |
2022-09-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 58,155 | 153,262 |
2022-06-01 | 0.2 | 2 | 10 | 30,141 | 79,394 |
2022-03-01 | 2.8095 | 59 | 21 | 182,297 | 40,942 |
2021-12-01 | 0.3571 | 5 | 14 | 72,407 | 107,433 |
2021-09-01 | 0.3333 | 4 | 12 | 49,671 | 82,123 |
2021-06-01 | 0.42 | 21 | 50 | 120,647 | 223,140 |
2021-03-01 | 0.8395 | 68 | 81 | 325,128 | 315,091 |
2020-12-01 | 0.3684 | 14 | 38 | 115,687 | 213,595 |
2020-09-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 41,906 | 69,216 |
2020-06-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 42,217 | 70,328 |
2020-03-01 | 1.0833 | 52 | 48 | 276,614 | 84,894 |
2019-12-01 | 0.5 | 20 | 40 | 70,598 | 124,260 |
2019-09-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 33,577 | 55,808 |
2019-06-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 54,734 | 114,682 |
2019-03-01 | 0.7581 | 47 | 62 | 293,698 | 222,467 |
2018-12-01 | 0.5217 | 12 | 23 | 66,691 | 100,433 |
2018-09-01 | 0.3684 | 7 | 19 | 82,200 | 173,260 |
2018-06-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 96,395 | 173,921 |
2018-03-01 | 1.381 | 58 | 42 | 412,888 | 296,414 |
2017-12-01 | 0.64 | 16 | 25 | 84,663 | 123,789 |
2017-09-01 | 1.75 | 7 | 4 | 22,526 | 40,418 |
2017-06-01 | 0.5 | 8 | 16 | 54,004 | 109,931 |
2017-03-01 | 1.6905 | 71 | 42 | 484,523 | 166,435 |
2016-12-01 | 0.5833 | 21 | 36 | 107,012 | 171,103 |
2016-09-01 | 0.5 | 6 | 12 | 42,407 | 98,197 |
2016-06-01 | 1.1429 | 8 | 7 | 16,082 | 37,481 |
2016-03-01 | 1.3968 | 88 | 63 | 572,718 | 290,228 |
2015-12-01 | 2.5 | 5 | 2 | 409.00 | 3,446 |
2015-09-01 | 0.75 | 9 | 12 | 20,949 | 49,873 |
2015-06-01 | 0.8182 | 9 | 11 | 55,114 | 116,229 |
2015-03-01 | 1.2206 | 83 | 68 | 597,327 | 365,864 |
2014-12-01 | 1.0 | 6 | 6 | 3,686 | 10,668 |
2014-09-01 | 0.6667 | 6 | 9 | 1,933 | 10,314 |
2014-06-01 | 0.875 | 7 | 8 | 61,226 | 121,666 |
2014-03-01 | 1.6667 | 70 | 42 | 551,995 | 278,253 |
2013-12-01 | 0.6316 | 12 | 19 | 97,485 | 144,107 |
2013-09-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 252.00 | 17,343 |
2013-06-01 | 0.5714 | 8 | 14 | 50,334 | 96,748 |
2013-03-01 | 1.3256 | 57 | 43 | 597,641 | 252,772 |
2012-12-01 | 0.6154 | 16 | 26 | 176,493 | 291,706 |
2012-09-01 | 0.6087 | 14 | 23 | 148,973 | 283,601 |
2012-06-01 | 2.8 | 14 | 5 | 25,820 | 26,497 |
2012-03-01 | 1.2 | 66 | 55 | 596,395 | 303,212 |
2011-12-01 | 0.7059 | 12 | 17 | 37,323 | 55,485 |
2011-09-01 | 1.5 | 9 | 6 | 22,808 | 21,640 |
2011-03-01 | 2.4211 | 46 | 19 | 449,661 | 162,542 |
2010-12-01 | 0.7368 | 14 | 19 | 26,243 | 63,456 |
2010-09-01 | 1.1667 | 7 | 6 | 12,380 | 22,820 |
2010-06-01 | 5.3333 | 16 | 3 | 27,676 | 5,457 |
2010-03-01 | 1.0 | 29 | 29 | 373,811 | 152,231 |
2009-12-01 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | 2,005 | 3,700 |
2009-06-01 | 7.0 | 14 | 2 | 35,517 | 5,900 |
2009-03-01 | 2.9167 | 35 | 12 | 489,276 | 148,437 |
2008-12-01 | 12.0 | 12 | 1 | 18,422 | 1,000.00 |
2008-09-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 13,313 | 19,643 |
2008-06-01 | 0.5814 | 25 | 43 | 361,408 | 720,690 |
2008-03-01 | 0.2143 | 42 | 196 | 583,575 | 488,634 |
2007-12-01 | 0.381 | 8 | 21 | 12,671 | 38,072 |
2007-09-01 | 1.25 | 20 | 16 | 33,612 | 49,800 |
2007-06-01 | 0.5778 | 26 | 45 | 107,589 | 120,096 |
2007-03-01 | 2.0714 | 29 | 14 | 527,358 | 96,268 |
2006-12-01 | 0.8182 | 9 | 11 | 60,194 | 118,000 |
2006-09-01 | 1.75 | 7 | 4 | 16,369 | 28,717 |
2006-06-01 | 2.6667 | 16 | 6 | 69,492 | 103,000 |
2006-03-01 | 1.3704 | 37 | 27 | 497,433 | 297,177 |
2005-12-01 | 0.6111 | 11 | 18 | 27,720 | 58,477 |
2005-09-01 | 5.0 | 15 | 3 | 9,644 | 12,000 |
2005-06-01 | 19.0 | 19 | 1 | 49,723 | 1,500 |
2005-03-01 | 3.5556 | 32 | 9 | 148,177 | 41,493 |
2004-12-01 | 3.5714 | 25 | 7 | 244,686 | 86,318 |
2004-09-01 | 4.1667 | 25 | 6 | 24,393 | 44,200 |
2004-03-01 | 2.3846 | 31 | 13 | 418,998 | 126,587 |
2003-12-01 | 2.7778 | 25 | 9 | 16,435 | 21,975 |
2003-06-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 429.00 | 2,200 |
Snap On Notable Stakeholders
A Snap On stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Snap On often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Snap On's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Snap On's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Nicholas Pinchuk | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
Iain Boyd | Vice President - Operations Development | Profile | |
Constance Johnsen | Vice President Controller | Profile | |
June Lemerand | Chief Information Officer, Vice President | Profile | |
Thomas Ward | Senior Vice President, President - Repair Systems and Information Group | Profile | |
Thomas Kassouf | Sr. VP and President of the Snap-On Tools Group | Profile | |
Richard Strege | Principal Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller | Profile | |
Timothy Chambers | Senior Vice President and President - Snap-on Tools Group | Profile | |
Richard Miller | Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
Leslie Kratcoski | Vice President - Investor Relations | Profile | |
Eugenio Amador | President Equipment | Profile | |
Anup Banerjee | Senior Vice President - Human Resources and Chief Development Officer | Profile | |
Aldo Pagliari | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President - Finance | Profile | |
William Lehman | Independent Director | Profile | |
Nathan Jones | Independent Director | Profile | |
Karen Daniel | Independent Director | Profile | |
David Adams | Independent Director | Profile | |
James Holden | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
John Fiedler | Independent Director | Profile | |
Dudley Lehman | Independent Director | Profile | |
Ruth Gillis | Independent Director | Profile | |
Gregg Sherrill | Independent Director | Profile | |
Henry Knueppel | Independent Director | Profile | |
Donald Stebbins | Independent Director | Profile | |
Jeanne Moreno | CIO and VP | Profile | |
Irwin Shur | VP, General Counsel and Secretary | Profile | |
Bradley Lewis | Technology, Operations | Profile | |
Sara Verbsky | Vice Relations | Profile | |
Maria Vieira | Commercial Operations | Profile | |
Marty Ozolins | Principal Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller | Profile | |
Jesus Arregui | Senior Vice President and President – Commercial Group | Profile | |
Samuel Bottum | Chief VP | Profile |
About Snap On Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Snap On often depends on how effective the management is. Snap On management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Snap management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Snap management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.15 | 0.08 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.23 | 0.18 | |
Return On Assets | 0.12 | 0.07 | |
Return On Equity | 0.18 | 0.12 |
The data published in Snap On's official financial statements usually reflect Snap On's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Snap On. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Snap accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Snap On's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Machinery space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Snap On's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Snap On's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Snap On's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Snap On. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Snap On's management manipulating its earnings.
Snap On Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Snap On use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Snap On within its industry.Snap On Manpower Efficiency
Return on Snap On Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 387K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 159.6M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 76.6K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 31.6M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 205.3K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 84.7M |
Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Snap On. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors. For information on how to trade Snap Stock refer to our How to Trade Snap Stock guide.You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.
Complementary Tools for Snap Stock analysis
When running Snap On's price analysis, check to measure Snap On's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Snap On is operating at the current time. Most of Snap On's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Snap On's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Snap On's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Snap On to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets |
Is Snap On's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Snap On. If investors know Snap will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Snap On listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.076 | Dividend Share 6.72 | Earnings Share 18.77 | Revenue Per Share 96.565 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.04 |
The market value of Snap On is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Snap that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Snap On's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Snap On's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Snap On's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Snap On's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Snap On's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Snap On is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Snap On's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.