Designer Brands Stock Probability Of Bankruptcy
Designer Brands fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Designer Brands' financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Designer Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Designer Brands' intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Designer Brands stock.
Designer |
Designer Brands Company odds of financial turmoil Analysis
Designer Brands' Probability Of Bankruptcy is a relative measure of the likelihood of financial distress. For stocks, the Probability Of Bankruptcy is the normalized value of Z-Score. For funds and ETFs, it is derived from a multi-factor model developed by Macroaxis. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm or a fund experiencing financial distress within the next 24 months. Unlike Z-Score, Probability Of Bankruptcy is the value between 0 and 100, indicating the firm's actual probability it will be financially distressed in the next 2 fiscal years.
More About Probability_Of_Bankruptcy | All Equity Analysis
Probability Of Bankruptcy | = | Normalized | | Z-Score |
Current Designer Brands Probability Of Bankruptcy | Over 100% |
Most of Designer Brands' fundamental indicators, such as Probability Of Bankruptcy, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Designer Brands is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Our calculation of Designer Brands probability of bankruptcy is based on Altman Z-Score and Piotroski F-Score, but not limited to these measures. To be applied to a broader range of industries and markets, we use several other techniques to enhance the accuracy of predicting Designer Brands odds of financial distress. These include financial statement analysis, different types of price predictions, earning estimates, analysis consensus, and basic intrinsic valuation. Please use the options below to get a better understanding of different measures that drive the calculation of Designer Brands financial health.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Designer Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Designer Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Designer Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party. The Probability of Bankruptcy SHOULD NOT be confused with the actual chance of a company to file for chapter 7, 11, 12, or 13 bankruptcy protection. Macroaxis simply defines Financial Distress as an operational condition where a company is having difficulty meeting its current financial obligations towards its creditors or delivering on the expectations of its investors. Macroaxis derives these conditions daily from both public financial statements as well as analysis of stock prices reacting to market conditions or economic downturns, including short-term and long-term historical volatility. Other factors taken into account include analysis of liquidity, revenue patterns, R&D expenses, and commitments, as well as public headlines and social sentiment.
CompetitionBased on the latest financial disclosure, Designer Brands has a Probability Of Bankruptcy of 100%. This is 141.6% higher than that of the Consumer Cyclical sector and 279.79% higher than that of the Apparel Stores industry. The probability of bankruptcy for all United States stocks is 151.07% lower than that of the firm.
Designer Probability Of Bankruptcy Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Designer Brands' direct or indirect competition against its Probability Of Bankruptcy to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Designer Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Designer Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Designer Brands is currently under evaluation in probability of bankruptcy category among related companies.
Designer Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.14 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.0808 | |||
| Profit Margin | 0.05 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 7.91 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 1.73 B | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 70.7 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 7.20 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 97.75 % | |||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 3.97 M | |||
| Price To Earning | 56.44 X | |||
| Price To Book | 2.09 X | |||
| Price To Sales | 0.55 X | |||
| Revenue | 3.18 B | |||
| Gross Profit | 949.81 M | |||
| EBITDA | 227.9 M | |||
| Net Income | (20.47 M) | |||
| Cash And Equivalents | 169.09 M | |||
| Cash Per Share | 1.49 X | |||
| Total Debt | 160 M | |||
| Debt To Equity | 19.20 % | |||
| Current Ratio | 2.06 X | |||
| Book Value Per Share | 8.59 X | |||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 57.4 M | |||
| Short Ratio | 3.37 X | |||
| Earnings Per Share | (0.26) X | |||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | 0.98 X | |||
| Number Of Employees | 16.1 K | |||
| Beta | 1.3 | |||
| Market Capitalization | 1.77 B | |||
| Total Asset | 1.37 B | |||
| Retained Earnings | 214.43 M | |||
| Working Capital | 472.24 M | |||
| Current Asset | 795.67 M | |||
| Current Liabilities | 323.43 M | |||
| Z Score | 8.6 | |||
| Five Year Return | 3.24 % | |||
| Last Dividend Paid | 0.25 |
Pair Trading with Designer Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Designer Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.The ability to find closely correlated positions to ONEOK could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace ONEOK when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back ONEOK - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling ONEOK Inc to buy it.
The correlation of ONEOK is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as ONEOK moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if ONEOK Inc moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for ONEOK can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in state. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.
Other Consideration for investing in Designer Stock
If you are still planning to invest in Designer Brands check if it may still be traded through OTC markets such as Pink Sheets or OTC Bulletin Board. You may also purchase it directly from the company, but this is not always possible and may require contacting the company directly. Please note that delisted stocks are often considered to be more risky investments, as they are no longer subject to the same regulatory and reporting requirements as listed stocks. Therefore, it is essential to carefully research the Designer Brands' history and understand the potential risks before investing.
| Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
| Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
| Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
| Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
| Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal |