Spdr Portfolio Sp Etf Piotroski F Score

SPSM Etf  USD 40.71  0.59  1.43%   
This module uses fundamental data of SPDR Portfolio to approximate its Piotroski F score. SPDR Portfolio F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of SPDR Portfolio SP. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about SPDR Portfolio financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out SPDR Portfolio Altman Z Score, SPDR Portfolio Correlation, Portfolio Optimization, as well as analyze SPDR Portfolio Alpha and Beta and SPDR Portfolio Hype Analysis.
  
At this time, it appears that SPDR Portfolio's Piotroski F Score is Inapplicable. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
0.0
Piotroski F Score - Inapplicable
Current Return On Assets

N/A

Focus
Change in Return on Assets

N/A

Focus
Cash Flow Return on Assets

N/A

Focus
Current Quality of Earnings (accrual)

N/A

Focus
Asset Turnover Growth

N/A

Focus
Current Ratio Change

N/A

Focus
Long Term Debt Over Assets Change

N/A

Focus
Change In Outstending Shares

N/A

Focus
Change in Gross Margin

N/A

Focus

SPDR Portfolio Piotroski F Score Drivers

The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to SPDR Portfolio is to make sure SPDR is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if SPDR Portfolio's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if SPDR Portfolio's financial numbers are properly reported.

About SPDR Portfolio Piotroski F Score

F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.

About SPDR Portfolio Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze SPDR Portfolio SP's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of SPDR Portfolio using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of SPDR Portfolio SP based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this etf, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis

When determining whether SPDR Portfolio SP is a strong investment it is important to analyze SPDR Portfolio's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact SPDR Portfolio's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding SPDR Etf, refer to the following important reports:
Check out SPDR Portfolio Altman Z Score, SPDR Portfolio Correlation, Portfolio Optimization, as well as analyze SPDR Portfolio Alpha and Beta and SPDR Portfolio Hype Analysis.
You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.
The market value of SPDR Portfolio SP is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of SPDR that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of SPDR Portfolio's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is SPDR Portfolio's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because SPDR Portfolio's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect SPDR Portfolio's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between SPDR Portfolio's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if SPDR Portfolio is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, SPDR Portfolio's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.