The Drivers Module shows relationships between Alphabet's most relevant fundamental drivers and provides multiple suggestions of what could possibly affect the performance of Alphabet over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers. Please also check Risk vs Return Analysis
Alphabet Book Value Per Share vs. Total Asset Fundamental AnalysisAlphabet is one of the top stocks in total asset category among related companies. It is one of the top stocks in book value per share category among related companies . The ratio of Total Asset to Book Value Per Share for Alphabet is about 763,084,282 Total Asset is everything that a business owns. It is the sum of current and long-term assets owned by a firm at a given time. These assets are listed on a balance sheet and typically valued based on their purchasing prices, not the current market value.
Total Asset is typically divided on the balance sheet on current asset and long-term asset. Long-term is the value of a company property, and other capital assets that are expected to be useable for more than one year. Long term assets are reported net of depreciation. On the other hand current assets are assets that are expected to be sold or converted to cash as part of normal business operation.Book Value per Share (B/S) is can be calculated by subtracting liabilities from assets, and then dividing it by the total number of currently outstanding shares. It indicates the level of safety associated with each common share after removing effects of liabilities. In other words a shareholder can use this ratio to see how much he or she can sell the stake in the company in the event of liquidation.
The naive approach to look at Book Value per Share is to compare it to current stock price. If Book Value per Share is higher than the currently traded stock price, the company can be considered undervalued. However, investors must be aware that conventional calculation of Book Value does not include intangible assets such as good will, intellectual property, trademarks or brands and may not be an appropriate measure for many firms.