Under Armour Total Debt vs. Z Score

UA Stock  USD 6.61  0.01  0.15%   
Considering Under Armour's profitability and operating efficiency indicators, Under Armour C is performing exceptionally good at this time. It has a great probability to showcase excellent profitability results in May. Profitability indicators assess Under Armour's ability to earn profits and add value for shareholders. At present, Under Armour's Days Sales Outstanding is projected to increase based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Operating Cash Flow Sales Ratio is expected to grow to 0.12, whereas Price To Sales Ratio is forecasted to decline to 1.40. At present, Under Armour's Income Before Tax is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Total Other Income Expense Net is expected to grow to about 15.9 M, whereas Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income is projected to grow to (58 M).
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Gross Profit Margin0.530.5035
Notably Up
Slightly volatile
For Under Armour profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Under Armour to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Under Armour C utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Under Armour's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Under Armour C over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
  
Check out World Market Map.
Is Under Armour's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Under Armour. If investors know Under will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Under Armour listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.04)
Earnings Share
0.89
Revenue Per Share
13.038
Quarterly Revenue Growth
(0.06)
Return On Assets
0.0346
The market value of Under Armour C is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Under that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Under Armour's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Under Armour's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Under Armour's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Under Armour's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Under Armour's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Under Armour is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Under Armour's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

Under Armour C Z Score vs. Total Debt Fundamental Analysis

Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Under Armour's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Under Armour value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth.
Under Armour C is rated below average in total debt category among related companies. It is currently under evaluation in z score category among related companies . Comparative valuation analysis is a catch-all model that can be used if you cannot value Under Armour by discounting back its dividends or cash flows. This model doesn't attempt to find an intrinsic value for Under Armour's Stock. Still, instead, it compares the stock's price multiples to a benchmark or nearest competition to determine if the stock is relatively undervalued or overvalued. The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Under Armour's earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.

Under Total Debt vs. Competition

Under Armour C is rated below average in total debt category among related companies. Total debt of Consumer Discretionary industry is at this time estimated at about 23.6 Billion. Under Armour holds roughly 1.52 Billion in total debt claiming about 6% of stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.
Total debt  Revenue  Capitalization  Valuation  Workforce

Under Z Score vs. Total Debt

Total Debt refers to the amount of long term interest-bearing liabilities that a company carries on its balance sheet. That may include bonds sold to the public, notes written to banks or capital leases. Typically, debt can help a company magnify its earnings, but the burden of interest and principal payments will eventually prevent the firm from borrow excessively.

Under Armour

Total Debt

 = 

Bonds

+

Notes

 = 
1.52 B
In most industries, total debt may also include the current portion of long-term debt. Since debt terms vary widely from one company to another, simply comparing outstanding debt obligations between different companies may not be adequate. It is usually meant to compare total debt amounts between companies that operate within the same sector.
Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..

Under Armour

Z Score

 = 

Sum Of

5 Factors

 = 
null
To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.

Under Armour Profitability Projections

The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Under Armour, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Under Armour will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Under Armour's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Under Armour, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income-61.1 M-58 M
Operating Income326.4 M174.1 M
Income Before Tax330.9 M347.5 M
Total Other Income Expense Net15.1 M15.9 M
Net Income444.8 M467 M
Income Tax Expense-116.2 M-110.4 M
Net Income From Continuing Ops444.8 M467 M
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares444.8 M467 M
Non Operating Income Net Other-57.3 M-54.5 M
Interest Income14.7 M14 M
Net Interest Income-14.7 M-15.5 M
Change To Netincome162.2 M98.4 M
Net Income Per Share 0.77  0.81 
Income Quality 1.85  1.94 
Net Income Per E B T 0.92  0.73 

Under Profitability Driver Comparison

Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Under Armour. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Under Armour position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Under Armour's important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.

Use Under Armour in pair-trading

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Under Armour position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Under Armour will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Under Armour Pair Trading

Under Armour C Pair Trading Analysis

The ability to find closely correlated positions to Under Armour could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Under Armour when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Under Armour - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Under Armour C to buy it.
The correlation of Under Armour is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Under Armour moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Under Armour C moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Under Armour can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Use Investing Themes to Complement your Under Armour position

In addition to having Under Armour in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Office Supplies Thematic Idea Now

Office Supplies
Office Supplies Theme
Companies producing and selling office supplies, and accessories. The Office Supplies theme has 46 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Office Supplies Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All  Next Launch
When determining whether Under Armour C offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Under Armour's financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Under Armour C Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Under Armour C Stock:
Check out World Market Map.
Note that the Under Armour C information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Under Armour's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.

Complementary Tools for Under Stock analysis

When running Under Armour's price analysis, check to measure Under Armour's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Under Armour is operating at the current time. Most of Under Armour's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Under Armour's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Under Armour's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Under Armour to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
To fully project Under Armour's future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Under Armour C at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Under Armour's income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.
Potential Under Armour investors and stakeholders can use historical trends found within financial statements to determine how well the company is positioned for the future. Although Under Armour investors may work on each financial statement separately, they are all related. The changes in Under Armour's assets and liabilities, for example, are also reflected in the revenues and expenses that we see on Under Armour's income statement, which results in the company's gains or losses. Cash flows can provide more information regarding cash listed on a balance sheet but not equivalent to net income shown on the income statement. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.