Formula Competitors
| FORTY Stock | USD 71.89 1.84 2.50% |
You can use the Comparative Equity Analysis module to analyze the advantages of investing in your portfolio's related equities across multiple sectors and thematic ideas. Please use the input box below to enter symbols for particular investments you would like to analyze. With the equity comparison module, you can estimate the relative effect of Formula Systems competition on your existing holdings. Check out Formula Systems Correlation with its peers.
Formula |
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, frequently view the market will even out over time. This tendency of Formula Systems' price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. However, historically, high market prices usually discourage investors that believe in mean reversion to invest, while low prices are viewed as an opportunity to buy. Please use the tools below to analyze the current value of Formula Systems in the context of predictive analytics.
Formula Systems Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Formula Systems and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Formula and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Formula Systems 1985 does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
ARRY | LYFT | GAIN | CETEF | PG | AUR | CSWC | MCK | ADBE | ||
ARRY | -0.13 | -0.47 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.32 | 0.47 | 0.38 | 0.43 | ARRY | |
LYFT | -0.13 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.44 | 0.52 | 0.48 | -0.23 | 0.62 | LYFT | |
GAIN | -0.47 | 0.63 | 0.3 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.11 | -0.39 | 0.2 | GAIN | |
CETEF | 0.19 | 0.64 | 0.3 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.88 | 0.27 | 0.8 | CETEF | |
PG | 0.11 | 0.44 | 0.17 | 0.69 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.57 | PG | |
AUR | 0.32 | 0.52 | 0.15 | 0.64 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 0.27 | 0.68 | AUR | |
CSWC | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.11 | 0.88 | 0.7 | 0.74 | 0.49 | 0.78 | CSWC | |
MCK | 0.38 | -0.23 | -0.39 | 0.27 | 0.4 | 0.27 | 0.49 | 0.04 | MCK | |
ADBE | 0.43 | 0.62 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.04 | ADBE | |
ARRY | LYFT | GAIN | CETEF | PG | AUR | CSWC | MCK | ADBE |
| Click cells to compare fundamentals | Check Volatility | Backtest Portfolio |
High positive correlations | High negative correlations |
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Formula Stock performing well and Formula Systems company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Formula Systems' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Information Ratio | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value At@Risk | Maximum Drawdown | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARRY | 2.62 | 0.34 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 2.76 | 0.08 | (3.04) | 6.13 | (5.22) | 31.92 |
| LYFT | 3.26 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 3.89 | 0.0331 | (3.50) | 6.09 | (6.18) | 19.04 |
| GAIN | 0.61 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.93 | 0.0105 | (0.55) | 1.04 | (1.59) | 3.21 |
| CETEF | 2.46 | 0.59 | 0.15 | (0.68) | 2.31 | 0.18 | (4.29) | 7.14 | (4.55) | 14.86 |
| PG | 0.59 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.76 | 0.05 | (0.58) | 1.19 | (1.19) | 4.58 |
| AUR | 4.74 | 0.56 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 5.62 | 0.09 | (5.45) | 11.19 | (9.39) | 31.12 |
| CSWC | 0.74 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.96 | 0.62 | 0.29 | (0.93) | 1.87 | (1.38) | 5.99 |
| MCK | 0.89 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 1.80 | 0.98 | 0.1 | (0.98) | 1.80 | (1.82) | 8.41 |
| ADBE | 1.32 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 1.69 | 0.08 | (1.34) | 2.56 | (3.42) | 7.49 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Formula Systems 1985 and related stocks such as Array TechnologiesInc, LYFT Inc, and Gladstone Investment Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARRY | (60.8 M) | (60.8 M) | (60.8 M) | (60.8 M) | (60.8 M) | (60.8 M) | (60.8 M) | (60.8 M) | (60.8 M) | 39.7 M | 59.1 M | (50.4 M) | 4.4 M | 4.8 M |
| LYFT | (682.8 M) | (682.8 M) | (682.8 M) | (682.8 M) | (682.8 M) | (682.8 M) | (682.8 M) | (688.3 M) | (911.3 M) | (2.6 B) | (1.8 B) | (1.1 B) | (1.6 B) | (1.7 B) |
| GAIN | 17.3 M | 17.3 M | 17.3 M | (1.3 M) | 50.2 M | 24.9 M | 44.8 M | 60.7 M | 81.6 M | (7.2 M) | 42.5 M | 102.3 M | 35.5 M | 42.5 M |
| PG | 11.3 B | 11.3 B | 11.3 B | 11.6 B | 7 B | 10.5 B | 15.3 B | 9.8 B | 3.9 B | 13 B | 14.3 B | 14.7 B | 14.7 B | 14.4 B |
| AUR | (94.1 M) | (94.1 M) | (94.1 M) | (94.1 M) | (94.1 M) | (94.1 M) | (94.1 M) | (94.1 M) | (94.1 M) | (94.1 M) | (214 M) | (755 M) | (1.7 B) | (1.8 B) |
| CSWC | 107.8 M | 107.8 M | 107.8 M | 112 M | 53.4 M | (5.4 M) | 23.5 M | 39.3 M | 33.1 M | (22.4 M) | 50.9 M | 42.8 M | 33.1 M | 35.3 M |
| MCK | 1.3 B | 1.3 B | 1.3 B | 1.3 B | 1.5 B | 2.3 B | 5.1 B | 67 M | 34 M | 900 M | (4.5 B) | 3.6 B | 3.2 B | 3.5 B |
| ADBE | 1.7 B | 1.7 B | 1.7 B | 1.7 B | 1.7 B | 1.7 B | 1.7 B | 4.8 B | 4.8 B | 4.8 B | 4.8 B | 4.8 B | 2.6 B | 2.7 B |
Formula Systems 1985 and related stocks such as Array TechnologiesInc, LYFT Inc, and Gladstone Investment Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Formula Systems 1985 financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Formula Systems 1985 operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue. The portion of profit or loss for the period; net of income taxes; which is attributable to the parent after the deduction of Net Income to Non Controlling Interests from Consolidated Income; and before the deduction of Preferred Dividends.Formula Systems Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Formula Systems competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Formula Systems' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Formula Systems' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Formula Systems Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Formula Systems Competition
Formula Systems' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Formula Systems 1985 in relation to its competition. Formula Systems' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Formula Systems in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Formula Systems' competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Formula Systems 1985, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Formula Systems position
In addition to having Formula Systems in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Electronic Equipment Thematic Idea Now
Electronic Equipment
Fama and French investing themes focus on testing asset pricing under different economic assumptions. The Electronic Equipment theme has 61 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Electronic Equipment Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Formula Systems Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.
Complementary Tools for Formula Stock analysis
When running Formula Systems' price analysis, check to measure Formula Systems' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Formula Systems is operating at the current time. Most of Formula Systems' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Formula Systems' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Formula Systems' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Formula Systems to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
| Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
| Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
| Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
| Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets |
Is Formula Systems' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Formula Systems. If investors know Formula will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Formula Systems listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.48) | Earnings Share 4.14 | Revenue Per Share 170.63 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.017 | Return On Assets 0.0559 |
The market value of Formula Systems 1985 is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Formula that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Formula Systems' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Formula Systems' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Formula Systems' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Formula Systems' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Formula Systems' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Formula Systems is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Formula Systems' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.