Procter Stock Executives

PG
 Stock
  

USD 135.58  0.63  0.46%   

Procter Gamble employes about 106 K people. The company is managed by 68 executives with total tenure of roughly 417 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive having 1558.82 employees per reported executive. Evaluation of Procter Gamble management performance can provide insight into the firm performance. Note, employee sentiment is becoming a valuable factor that investors use to determine the amount of risk that may be associated with Procter Gamble future performance.
Please check Your Equity Center.
  
  Martin Riant  CEO
Group Pres and Advisor to the CEO
  Alan Lafley  Chairman
Executive Chairman and Member of Proxy Committee
  David Taylor  Chairman
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer

Procter Gamble Management Team Effectiveness

Procter Gamble has Return on Asset (ROA) of 9.41 % which means that for every $100 of asset, it generated profit of $9.41. This is typical in the industry. Likewise, it shows return on total equity (ROE) of 31.64 %, which means that it produced $31.64 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. Procter Gamble management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well the company manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.

Procter Gamble Workforce Comparison

Procter Gamble is considered to be number one stock in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Household & Personal Products industry is at this time estimated at about 106,126. Procter Gamble totals roughly 106,000 in number of employees claiming about 100% of equities under Household & Personal Products industry.

Procter Gamble Profit Margins

The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of 18.38 %, which may suggest that it has sound control over its expenditures, executes well on its competitive polices, or have a solid pricing strategies. This is very large. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 25.71 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of 0.26.

Procter Gamble Insider Trading

Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Procter Gamble insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Procter Gamble's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Procter Gamble insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.

Procter Gamble Benchmark Summation

The output start index for this execution was four with a total number of output elements of fifty-seven. The Indexes of lowest and highest values over a specified period line shows minimum and maximum index of Procter Gamble price series.
.

Procter Gamble Notable Stakeholders

A Procter Gamble stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Procter Gamble often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Procter Gamble's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Procter Gamble's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Martin Riant - Group Pres and Advisor to the CEOProfile
Fama Francisco - Chief Executive Officer - Baby and Feminine CareProfile
Ma Francisco - Chief Executive Officer - Baby and Feminine CareProfile
Shailesh Jejurikar - Chief Operating Officer, Chief Executive Officer - Fabric and Home CareProfile
Alan Lafley - Executive Chairman and Member of Proxy CommitteeProfile
David Taylor - Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive OfficerProfile
Jon Moeller - Vice Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive OfficerProfile
Mary FergusonMcHugh - Group President - Global Family Care and Global Brand Creation and Innovation, P&G VenturesProfile
Hatsunori Kiriyama - President - AsiaProfile
Magesvaran Suranjan - President - Asia Pacific Selling and Market OperationsProfile
Tarek Farahat - President - Latin AmericaProfile
Mohamed Samir - President - India, Middle East and Africa (IMEA) Selling and Market OperationsProfile
Alexandra Keith - President - Global Hair Care and Beauty SectorProfile
Valarie Sheppard - Controller and Treasurer and Executive Vice President - Company Transition LeaderProfile
Giovanni Ciserani - Group President of Global Fabric and Home Care and Global Baby and Feminine CareProfile
Steven Bishop - Group President - Global Feminine and Family CareProfile
Juan Posada - President - Latin America Selling and Market OperationsProfile
Matthew Price - President - Greater China Selling and Market OperationsProfile
Julio Nemeth - President - Global Business ServicesProfile
Patrice Louvet - Group President - Global BeautyProfile
Charles Pierce - Group President - Global GroomingProfile
Gary Coombe - President - Europe Selling and Market OperationsProfile
Carolyn Tastad - Group President - North America Selling and Market OperationsProfile
Andre Schulten - Chief Financial OfficerProfile
Kenneth Chenault - Independent DirectorProfile
Amy Chang - Independent DirectorProfile
Nelson Peltz - Independent DirectorProfile
Francis Blake - Independent DirectorProfile
Susan DesmondHellmann - Independent DirectorProfile
Margaret Whitman - Independent DirectorProfile
Walter McNerney - Lead Independent DirectorProfile
Terry Lundgren - Independent DirectorProfile
Angela Braly - Independent DirectorProfile
James McNerney - Lead Independent DirectorProfile
Ernesto Zedillo - Independent DirectorProfile
Scott Cook - Independent DirectorProfile
Ernesto Leon - Independent DirectorProfile
John Chevalier - Director - Investor RelationsProfile
Patricia Woertz - Independent DirectorProfile
Joseph Jimenez - Lead Independent DirectorProfile
Kathleen Fish - Chief Research, Development and Innovation OfficerProfile
Craig Buchholz - Chief Communications Officer and Vice President – Communications, Personal Health Care and Oral CareProfile
Debra Lee - Independent DirectorProfile
Mindy Sherwood - President Global WalmartProfile
Kirti Singh - Chief Analytics and Insights OfficerProfile
Thomas Finn - President - Personal Health CareProfile
Loic Tassel - President - EuropeProfile
Shelly McNamara - Senior Vice President of Human ResourcesProfile
M Grabowski - Chief Human Resource OfficerProfile
Victor Aguilar - Chief Research, Development and Innovation OfficerProfile
Javier Polit - Chief Information OfficerProfile
B Allen - Independent DirectorProfile
Henry Karamanoukian - President Go-to-Market, China and Hair Care, Greater ChinaProfile
Sundar Raman - President - Fabric Care, North America and P&G Professional, GlobalProfile
R Keith - President - Global Hair Care and Beauty SectorProfile
Yannis Skoufalos - Global Product Supply OfficerProfile
Linda ClementHolmes - CIOProfile
Jennifer Davis - President - Feminine CareProfile
Jeffrey Schomburger - Global Sales OfficerProfile
Monica Turner - Senior Vice President - Sales, North AmericaProfile
Vittorio Cretella - Chief Information OfficerProfile
Christine McCarthy - Independent DirectorProfile
Philip Duncan - Chief Design OfficerProfile
Marc Pritchard - Global Brand Building OfficerProfile
Markus Strobel - President - Skin & Personal CareProfile
Mark Biegger - Global Human Resources OfficerProfile
Laura Becker - President - Global Business ServicesProfile
Deborah Majoras - Chief Legal Officer, SecretaryProfile

About Procter Gamble Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as Procter Gamble often depends on how effective the management is. Procter Gamble management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Procter management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Procter management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
The Procter Gamble Company provides branded consumer packaged goods worldwide. The Procter Gamble Company was founded in 1837 and is headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. Procter Gamble operates under Household Consumables Manufacturers classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange.
The data published in Procter Gamble's official financial statements usually reflect Procter Gamble's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Procter Gamble. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Procter accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Procter Gamble's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Consumer Defensive space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Procter Gamble's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Procter Gamble's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Procter Gamble's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Procter Gamble. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Procter Gamble's management to manipulate its earnings.

Procter Gamble Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as Procter Gamble use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Procter Gamble within its industry.

Procter Gamble Manpower Efficiency

Return on Procter Gamble Manpower

Revenue Per Employee756.5 K
Revenue Per Executive1.2 B
Net Income Per Employee139.1 K
Net Income Per Executive216.8 M
Working Capital Per Employee28.4 K
Working Capital Per Executive44.3 M
Please check Your Equity Center. Note that the Procter Gamble information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Procter Gamble's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.

Complementary Tools for Procter Stock analysis

When running Procter Gamble price analysis, check to measure Procter Gamble's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Procter Gamble is operating at the current time. Most of Procter Gamble's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Procter Gamble's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Procter Gamble's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Procter Gamble to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Go
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Go
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Go
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Go
Analyst Recommendations
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Go
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Go
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Go
Bond Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Go
Is Procter Gamble's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Procter Gamble. If investors know Procter will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Procter Gamble listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of Procter Gamble is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Procter that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Procter Gamble's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Procter Gamble's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Procter Gamble's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Procter Gamble's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Procter Gamble's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine Procter Gamble value by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Procter Gamble's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.