Procter Gamble Company Top Insiders

PG Stock  USD 156.41  1.08  0.70%   
Roughly 75% of Procter Gamble's corporate insiders are selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Procter Gamble stock suggests that many insiders are alarmed at this time. Procter Gamble employs about 107 K people. The company is managed by 73 executives with a total tenure of roughly 545 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 1465.75 employees per reported executive.
Martin Riant  CEO
Group Pres and Advisor to the CEO
Alan Lafley  Chairman
Executive Chairman and Member of Proxy Committee

Procter Gamble's Insider Buying Vs Selling

25

 
Selling
 
Buying

Latest Trades

2024-03-04R. Alexandra KeithDisposed 776 @ 158.11View
2024-02-23Gary A CoombeDisposed 22000 @ 161.32View
2024-02-15Lloyd DoggettAcquired @ 157.01
2024-01-29Ma. Fatima FranciscoDisposed 45000 @ 156View
2024-01-25Shailesh JejurikarDisposed 31275 @ 154.9View
2024-01-24Marc S PritchardDisposed 101704 @ 153.57View
2024-01-19Tommy TubervilleAcquired @ 147.61
2023-11-30R. Alexandra KeithDisposed 6575 @ 153.47View
2023-11-15Lloyd DoggettAcquired @ 151.42
2023-11-14R. Alexandra KeithDisposed 19661 @ 153.47View
2023-11-06Andre SchultenDisposed 40298 @ 150.61View
2023-10-31Pete SessionsDisposed @ 150.03
2023-10-27Moses Victor Javier AguilarDisposed 7946 @ 147.09View
2023-10-24Greg StantonDisposed @ 149.88
2023-10-20Matthew W JanzarukDisposed 188 @ 148.52View
2023-10-03Markwayne MullinAcquired @ 145.5
Monitoring Procter Gamble's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.

Acquired vs Disposed

Filed vs Not Filed

Insider sentiment refers to the collective sentiment or feeling of Procter Gamble's insiders - typically its officers, directors, and beneficial owners holding more than a certain percentage of the company's stock - about the future prospects of Procter Gamble. This sentiment is often gauged based on the trading activities of these insiders. If insiders are purchasing more shares of their own company, it may be interpreted as a bullish sentiment, indicating that they believe Procter Gamble's stock will rise in value. Conversely, if insiders are selling shares, it might be seen as bearish, suggesting they expect the stock price to drop.
  
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Procter Gamble. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in price.
For more detail on how to invest in Procter Stock please use our How to Invest in Procter Gamble guide.

Procter Gamble's Workforce Through the Years

Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Procter Gamble's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Procter will maintain a workforce of roughly 110000 employees by May 2024.
 
Dot-com Bubble
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid

Procter Gamble's latest congressional trading

Congressional trading in companies like Procter Gamble, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Procter Gamble by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2023-10-24Representative Greg StantonDisposed Under $15KVerify
2023-09-21Senator John P RickettsAcquired $100K to $250KVerify
2023-09-11Representative C. Scott FranklinDisposed $15K to $50KVerify
2022-12-09Senator Tommy TubervilleAcquired Under $15KVerify
2022-08-03Representative Debbie DingellAcquired Under $15KVerify
2022-06-16Representative Diana HarshbargerDisposed Under $15KVerify
2022-06-10Representative Marjorie Taylor GreeneAcquired Under $15KVerify
2022-03-08Representative Dan NewhouseAcquired Under $15KVerify
2022-01-19Representative Pete SessionsDisposed $15K to $50KVerify
2020-05-11Representative K. Michael ConawayAcquired $15K to $50KVerify
2020-04-16Senator David A Perdue , JrAcquired Under $15KVerify
2020-04-07Senator Kelly LoefflerAcquired $15K to $50KVerify
2020-02-20Representative Mikie SherrillDisposed $15K to $50KVerify
2020-01-13Senator James M. InhofeAcquired $100K to $250KVerify
2019-02-27Senator Sheldon WhitehouseAcquired Under $15KVerify
2018-08-02Senator Patrick J. ToomeyAcquired $15K to $50KVerify
2018-01-28Representative Richard W. AllenDisposed Under $15KVerify
2017-01-20Senator John HoevenAcquired $100K to $250KVerify
2014-06-19Senator Susan M. CollinsAcquired Under $15KVerify
2014-06-19Senator Susan M CollinsAcquired Under $15KVerify

Procter Gamble Management Team Effectiveness

The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.1096 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.1096. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of 0.3178 %, which means that it produced $0.3178 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. Procter Gamble's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Procter Gamble manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The current Return On Tangible Assets is estimated to decrease to 0.14. The current Return On Capital Employed is estimated to decrease to 0.20. At this time, Procter Gamble's Other Assets are most likely to increase significantly in the upcoming years. The Procter Gamble's current Asset Turnover is estimated to increase to 0.99, while Non Current Assets Total are projected to decrease to roughly 65.5 B.
The Procter Gamble's current Common Stock Shares Outstanding is estimated to increase to about 2.3 B, while Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is projected to decrease to roughly 10.6 B.

Procter Gamble Workforce Comparison

Procter Gamble is regarded second in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Consumer Staples industry is at this time estimated at about 313,086. Procter Gamble totals roughly 107,000 in number of employees claiming about 34% of stocks in Consumer Staples industry.

Procter Gamble Profit Margins

The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of 0.18 %, which suggests that even a small decline in it sales will erase profits and may result in a net loss, or a negative profit margin. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 0.27 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of $0.27.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Gross Profit Margin0.380.43
Fairly Down
Pretty Stable
Net Profit Margin0.0880.16
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Operating Profit Margin0.130.2
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Pretax Profit Margin0.120.2
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Return On Assets0.07060.11
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Return On Equity0.180.28
Way Down
Slightly volatile

Procter Gamble Insider Trading History

Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Procter Gamble insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Procter Gamble's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Procter Gamble insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
 
Dot-com Bubble
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
Buy/Sell Ratio# Purchases Trades# Sales TradesTotal Shares PurchasedTotal Shares Sold
2024-03-01
1.04
26
25
 382,704 
 778,957 
2023-12-01
1.3269
69
52
 857,458 
 154,298 
2023-09-01
1.9167
69
36
 317,682 
 397,668 
2023-06-01
1.125
27
24
 117,088 
 242,318 
2023-03-01
1.125
18
16
 2,043 
 209,541 
2022-12-01
1.8611
67
36
 758,988 
 88,940 
2022-09-01
1.3056
47
36
 276,824 
 695,610 
2022-06-01
1.0667
16
15
 108,078 
 269,091 
2022-03-01
0.8529
29
34
 650,041 
 1,238,719 
2021-12-01
1.4107
79
56
 1,391,679 
 315,262 
2021-09-01
1.5094
80
53
 958,343 
 1,215,360 
2021-06-01
0.8387
26
31
 420,448 
 3,857,289 
2021-03-01
0.5349
23
43
 98,002 
 1,630,932 
2020-12-01
1.1519
91
79
 1,586,138 
 1,000,510 
2020-09-01
1.4091
93
66
 1,353,322 
 1,892,266 
2020-06-01
0.9231
24
26
 234,886 
 20,563,612 
2020-03-01
1.2083
58
48
 1,871,013 
 2,137,497 
2019-12-01
0.7794
53
68
 183,523 
 4,830,351 
2019-09-01
1.6731
87
52
 948,035 
 928,891 
2019-06-01
0.7193
41
57
 406,575 
 933,789 
2019-03-01
1.1286
79
70
 1,955,460 
 2,350,806 
2018-12-01
0.7757
83
107
 1,128,440 
 1,959,641 
2018-09-01
1.0541
117
111
 603,492 
 512,319 
2018-06-01
3.4286
24
7
 4,492 
 40,163 
2018-03-01
1.6757
62
37
 2,167,519 
 751,568 
2017-12-01
1.7
34
20
 51,880 
 85,968 
2017-09-01
1.6207
94
58
 860,404 
 228,073 
2017-06-01
1.3158
25
19
 191,459 
 392,694 
2017-03-01
0.9412
64
68
 2,502,658 
 1,655,457 
2016-12-01
2.8889
26
9
 14,179 
 10,795 
2016-09-01
1.0388
107
103
 1,053,898 
 1,218,026 
2016-06-01
0.9167
22
24
 183,086 
 555,570 
2016-03-01
0.7625
61
80
 1,921,440 
 2,352,375 
2015-12-01
1.1
33
30
 468,714 
 918,580 
2015-09-01
1.4561
83
57
 557,436 
 517,712 
2015-06-01
1.75
21
12
 62,626 
 117,003 
2015-03-01
1.0
46
46
 1,474,548 
 1,580,092 
2014-12-01
1.069
31
29
 154,048 
 288,969 
2014-09-01
1.1111
100
90
 867,455 
 952,077 
2014-06-01
0.6458
31
48
 576,907 
 1,381,335 
2014-03-01
0.82
41
50
 1,594,217 
 1,558,889 
2013-12-01
0.8556
77
90
 238,926 
 417,312 
2013-09-01
1.0274
75
73
 434,785 
 306,724 
2013-06-01
0.9333
14
15
 27,412 
 65,872 
2013-03-01
0.76
38
50
 1,531,200 
 1,023,953 
2012-12-01
1.75
28
16
 99,556 
 131,764 
2012-09-01
1.0175
58
57
 783,384 
 785,824 
2012-06-01
1.4545
16
11
 13,173 
 21,561 
2012-03-01
0.7727
34
44
 1,409,788 
 1,569,809 
2011-12-01
2.0
22
11
 40,684 
 48,444 
2011-09-01
0.9091
30
33
 103,990 
 165,870 
2011-06-01
0.8824
15
17
 32,421 
 74,265 
2011-03-01
0.8056
29
36
 1,376,740 
 1,227,285 
2010-12-01
1.1481
31
27
 153,190 
 260,334 
2010-09-01
1.4634
60
41
 255,261 
 62,719 
2010-06-01
1.2
18
15
 21,633 
 36,923 
2010-03-01
0.8333
35
42
 1,414,117 
 1,597,533 
2009-12-01
1.3913
32
23
 72,521 
 105,198 
2009-09-01
1.3125
63
48
 77,948 
 124,647 
2009-06-01
0.2857
4
14
 1,981 
 22,412 
2009-03-01
0.6667
26
39
 2,399,435 
 1,259,414 
2008-12-01
0.2453
13
53
 30,819 
 65,753 
2008-09-01
0.75
51
68
 209,896 
 372,576 
2008-06-01
0.2766
13
47
 60,732 
 75,897 
2008-03-01
0.7018
40
57
 2,220,332 
 1,534,916 
2007-12-01
0.2941
15
51
 75,478 
 208,584 
2007-09-01
0.5795
51
88
 335,252 
 431,295 
2007-06-01
0.3077
12
39
 169,347 
 288,204 
2007-03-01
0.7609
35
46
 1,688,661 
 538,913 
2006-12-01
1.2105
23
19
 22,379 
 55,158 
2006-09-01
1.4231
37
26
 263,742 
 113,670 
2006-06-01
1.1176
19
17
 141,326 
 287,938 
2006-03-01
0.6538
34
52
 1,734,086 
 557,340 
2005-12-01
1.3158
25
19
 45,034 
 30,186 
2005-09-01
0.766
36
47
 549,774 
 783,684 
2005-06-01
0.6923
9
13
 55,112 
 131,597 
2005-03-01
1.3333
24
18
 1,822,131 
 324,502 
2004-12-01
1.2857
27
21
 40,894 
 65,815 
2004-09-01
0.9767
42
43
 617,346 
 1,004,462 
2004-06-01
0.7778
28
36
 100,895 
 222,311 
2004-03-01
3.0556
55
18
 1,048,651 
 137,698 
2003-12-01
0.6452
20
31
 37,268 
 90,856 
2003-09-01
0.9412
32
34
 204,254 
 471,748 
2003-06-01
3.0
9
3
 283.03 
 10,077 
2003-03-01
8.0
8
1
 204.34 
 1.00 
2002-09-01
0.1
3
30
 242.81 
 367,246 

Procter Gamble Notable Stakeholders

A Procter Gamble stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Procter Gamble often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Procter Gamble's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Procter Gamble's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Martin RiantGroup Pres and Advisor to the CEOProfile
Fama FranciscoChief Executive Officer - Baby and Feminine CareProfile
Ma FranciscoChief Executive Officer - Baby and Feminine CareProfile
Shailesh JejurikarChief Operating Officer, Chief Executive Officer - Fabric and Home CareProfile
Alan LafleyExecutive Chairman and Member of Proxy CommitteeProfile
David TaylorChairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive OfficerProfile
Jon MoellerVice Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive OfficerProfile
Mary FergusonMcHughGroup President - Global Family Care and Global Brand Creation and Innovation, P&G VenturesProfile
Hatsunori KiriyamaPresident - AsiaProfile
Magesvaran SuranjanPresident - Asia Pacific Selling and Market OperationsProfile
Tarek FarahatPresident - Latin AmericaProfile
Mohamed SamirPresident - India, Middle East and Africa (IMEA) Selling and Market OperationsProfile
Alexandra KeithPresident - Global Hair Care and Beauty SectorProfile
Valarie SheppardController and Treasurer and Executive Vice President - Company Transition LeaderProfile
Giovanni CiseraniGroup President of Global Fabric and Home Care and Global Baby and Feminine CareProfile
Steven BishopGroup President - Global Feminine and Family CareProfile
Juan PosadaPresident - Latin America Selling and Market OperationsProfile
Matthew PricePresident - Greater China Selling and Market OperationsProfile
Julio NemethPresident - Global Business ServicesProfile
Patrice LouvetGroup President - Global BeautyProfile
Charles PierceGroup President - Global GroomingProfile
Gary CoombePresident - Europe Selling and Market OperationsProfile
Carolyn TastadGroup President - North America Selling and Market OperationsProfile
Andre SchultenChief Financial OfficerProfile
Kenneth ChenaultIndependent DirectorProfile
Amy ChangIndependent DirectorProfile
Nelson PeltzIndependent DirectorProfile
Francis BlakeIndependent DirectorProfile
Susan DesmondHellmannIndependent DirectorProfile
Margaret WhitmanIndependent DirectorProfile
Walter McNerneyLead Independent DirectorProfile
Terry LundgrenIndependent DirectorProfile
Angela BralyIndependent DirectorProfile
James McNerneyLead Independent DirectorProfile
Ernesto ZedilloIndependent DirectorProfile
Scott CookIndependent DirectorProfile
Ernesto LeonIndependent DirectorProfile
John ChevalierDirector - Investor RelationsProfile
Patricia WoertzIndependent DirectorProfile
Joseph JimenezLead Independent DirectorProfile
Kathleen FishChief Research, Development and Innovation OfficerProfile
Craig BuchholzChief Communications Officer and Vice President – Communications, Personal Health Care and Oral CareProfile
Matthew JanzarukSenior OfficerProfile
Debra LeeIndependent DirectorProfile
Mindy SherwoodPresident Global WalmartProfile
Kirti SinghChief Analytics and Insights OfficerProfile
Thomas FinnPresident - Personal Health CareProfile
Loic TasselPresident - EuropeProfile
Shelly McNamaraSenior Vice President of Human ResourcesProfile
M GrabowskiChief Human Resource OfficerProfile
Victor AguilarChief Research, Development and Innovation OfficerProfile
Damon JonesChief OfficerProfile
Javier PolitChief Information OfficerProfile
B AllenIndependent DirectorProfile
Henry KaramanoukianPresident Go-to-Market, China and Hair Care, Greater ChinaProfile
Sundar RamanPresident - Fabric Care, North America and P&G Professional, GlobalProfile
Susan WhaleyChief SecretaryProfile
R KeithPresident - Global Hair Care and Beauty SectorProfile
Yannis SkoufalosGlobal Product Supply OfficerProfile
Linda ClementHolmesCIOProfile
Jennifer DavisPresident - Feminine CareProfile
Fatima FranciscoFeminine BabyProfile
Jeffrey SchomburgerGlobal Sales OfficerProfile
Monica TurnerSenior Vice President - Sales, North AmericaProfile
Vittorio CretellaChief Information OfficerProfile
Christine McCarthyIndependent DirectorProfile
Philip DuncanChief Design OfficerProfile
Marc PritchardGlobal Brand Building OfficerProfile
Markus StrobelPresident - Skin & Personal CareProfile
Mark BieggerGlobal Human Resources OfficerProfile
Laura BeckerPresident - Global Business ServicesProfile
Deborah MajorasChief Legal Officer, SecretaryProfile
Ken PatelChief CounselProfile

About Procter Gamble Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as Procter Gamble often depends on how effective the management is. Procter Gamble management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Procter management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Procter management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Return On Tangible Assets 0.23  0.14 
Return On Capital Employed 0.25  0.20 
Return On Assets 0.11  0.07 
Return On Equity 0.28  0.18 
The data published in Procter Gamble's official financial statements usually reflect Procter Gamble's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Procter Gamble. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Procter accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Procter Gamble's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Household Products space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Procter Gamble's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Procter Gamble's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Procter Gamble's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Procter Gamble. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Procter Gamble's management manipulating its earnings.

Procter Gamble Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as Procter Gamble use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Procter Gamble within its industry.

Procter Gamble Manpower Efficiency

Return on Procter Gamble Manpower

Revenue Per Employee766.4K
Revenue Per Executive1.1B
Net Income Per Employee137.7K
Net Income Per Executive201.9M
When determining whether Procter Gamble is a strong investment it is important to analyze Procter Gamble's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Procter Gamble's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Procter Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Procter Gamble. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in price.
For more detail on how to invest in Procter Stock please use our How to Invest in Procter Gamble guide.
Note that the Procter Gamble information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Procter Gamble's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Complementary Tools for Procter Stock analysis

When running Procter Gamble's price analysis, check to measure Procter Gamble's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Procter Gamble is operating at the current time. Most of Procter Gamble's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Procter Gamble's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Procter Gamble's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Procter Gamble to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Is Procter Gamble's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Procter Gamble. If investors know Procter will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Procter Gamble listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.11)
Dividend Share
3.735
Earnings Share
5.96
Revenue Per Share
35.567
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.032
The market value of Procter Gamble is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Procter that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Procter Gamble's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Procter Gamble's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Procter Gamble's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Procter Gamble's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Procter Gamble's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Procter Gamble is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Procter Gamble's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.