Regional Health Company Insiders
| RHE Stock | USD 2.71 0.09 3.21% |
Regional Health employs about 114 people. The company is managed by 10 executives with a total tenure of roughly 5 years, averaging almost 0.0 years of service per executive, having 11.4 employees per reported executive. Evaluation of Regional Health's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| Grant Mooney Chairman Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board |
Regional |
Regional Health's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Regional Health's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Regional will maintain a workforce of about 110 employees by May 2024.Regional Health Management Team Effectiveness
As of April 16, 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is expected to decline to -0.07. The current year's Return On Capital Employed is expected to grow to -0.01. At present, Regional Health's Non Current Assets Total are projected to decrease significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Currrent Assets Other is expected to grow to about 10.4 M, whereas Total Current Assets are forecasted to decline to about 9.1 M. Regional Health's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Regional Health manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.As of April 16, 2024, Common Stock Shares Outstanding is expected to decline to about 1.2 M. In addition to that, Net Loss is expected to decline to about (15 M)
Regional Health Workforce Comparison
Regional Health Properties is rated below average in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Health Care industry is at this time estimated at about 571,014. Regional Health adds roughly 114 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Health Care industry.
Regional Health Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of (0.24) %, which means that it does not effectively control expenditures or properly executes on its pricing strategies. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.04 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.04 of operating income.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.32 | 0.2438 |
|
|
Regional Health Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Regional Health insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Regional Health's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Regional Health insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 31,994 | 0.00 |
| 2022-03-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 48,000 | 8,496 |
| 2021-09-01 | 0.4 | 2 | 5 | 48,000 | 4,000 |
| 2016-09-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 109,472 | 159,686 |
| 2016-03-01 | 4.5 | 9 | 2 | 313,344 | 4,500 |
| 2015-06-01 | 1.6667 | 5 | 3 | 28,079 | 11,922 |
| 2015-03-01 | 0.3333 | 2 | 6 | 159,472 | 122,622 |
| 2014-12-01 | 0.6471 | 22 | 34 | 634,245 | 198,317 |
| 2014-09-01 | 0.2353 | 4 | 17 | 487,042 | 417,069 |
| 2013-12-01 | 14.0 | 14 | 1 | 350,559 | 100,000 |
| 2013-06-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 71,621 | 1,621 |
| 2012-12-01 | 2.5 | 10 | 4 | 138,156 | 195,000 |
| 2012-09-01 | 2.6667 | 8 | 3 | 12,731 | 208,594 |
| 2012-06-01 | 5.0 | 25 | 5 | 350,764 | 20,452 |
| 2011-12-01 | 1.375 | 11 | 8 | 219,500 | 0.00 |
| 2011-09-01 | 0.9091 | 20 | 22 | 1,128,709 | 1,240,537 |
| 2011-06-01 | 3.6667 | 11 | 3 | 32,320 | 55,200 |
| 2011-03-01 | 9.0 | 18 | 2 | 61,200 | 250,000 |
| 2010-12-01 | 2.0 | 16 | 8 | 48,760 | 25,000 |
| 2009-12-01 | 3.8421 | 73 | 19 | 1,461,284 | 406,455 |
| 2007-12-01 | 1.0 | 14 | 14 | 1,069,972 | 6,000 |
Regional Health Notable Stakeholders
A Regional Health stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Regional Health often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Regional Health's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Regional Health's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Brent CFA | President, CEO | Profile | |
| Grant Mooney | Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Terence Topping | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
| Andrew Haythorpe | Executive Director | Profile | |
| Paul OSullivan | Principal VP | Profile | |
| Yaxi Zhan | Managing Director, Executive Director | Profile | |
| Brett Tucker | Company Secretary | Profile | |
| Tonya McMorris | Company Sec | Profile | |
| David Tenwick | Founder Director | Profile | |
| Deborah Ho | Company Secretary | Profile |
About Regional Health Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Regional Health Prop often depends on how effective the management is. Regional Health management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Regional management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Regional management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | (0.07) | (0.07) | |
| Return On Capital Employed | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Return On Assets | (0.06) | (0.07) | |
| Return On Equity | (21.02) | (19.97) |
The data published in Regional Health's official financial statements usually reflect Regional Health's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Regional Health Prop. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Regional accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Regional Health's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Health Care Providers & Services space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Regional Health's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Regional Health's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Regional Health's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Regional Health Properties. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Regional Health's management manipulating its earnings.
Regional Health Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Regional Health use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Regional Health within its industry.Regional Health Manpower Efficiency
Return on Regional Health Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 150.6K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 1.7M | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 34.1K | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 388.8K | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 28.9K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 329.9K |
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Regional Health Properties. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in rate. Note that the Regional Health Prop information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Regional Health's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.
Complementary Tools for Regional Stock analysis
When running Regional Health's price analysis, check to measure Regional Health's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Regional Health is operating at the current time. Most of Regional Health's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Regional Health's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Regional Health's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Regional Health to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
| Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
| My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
| Earnings Calls Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges | |
| Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon |
Is Regional Health's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Regional Health. If investors know Regional will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Regional Health listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Earnings Share 21.05 | Revenue Per Share 8.532 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.59) | Return On Assets (0.01) | Return On Equity (1.99) |
The market value of Regional Health Prop is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Regional that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Regional Health's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Regional Health's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Regional Health's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Regional Health's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Regional Health's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Regional Health is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Regional Health's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.