Starbucks Company Insiders
| SBUX Stock | USD 88.18 0.31 0.35% |
Slightly above 69% of Starbucks' corporate insiders are selling. The analysis of insider sentiment suggests that many Starbucks insiders are, at present, alarmed. Starbucks employs about 381 K people. The company is managed by 42 executives with a total tenure of roughly 221 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 9071.43 employees per reported executive.
| Howard Schultz Chairman Founder, Chairman and CEO |
| Paul Mutty President Senior Vice President Interim General Counsel |
Starbucks' Insider Buying Vs Selling
31
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2024-04-15 | Michael Aaron Conway | Disposed 3250 @ 85.39 | View | ||
| 2024-03-21 | Sara Kelly | Disposed 250 @ 92.63 | View | ||
| 2024-02-23 | Shelley Moore Capito | Acquired @ 95.62 | |||
| 2024-02-21 | Sara Kelly | Disposed 250 @ 93.86 | View | ||
| 2024-02-15 | Michael Aaron Conway | Disposed 3250 @ 94.03 | View | ||
| 2024-01-23 | Kathy E. Manning | Disposed @ 91.97 | |||
| 2024-01-22 | Sara Kelly | Disposed 250 @ 93.78 | View | ||
| 2024-01-17 | Thomas R. Carper | Acquired @ 91.77 | |||
| 2023-12-21 | Sara Kelly | Disposed 250 @ 95 | View | ||
| 2023-12-11 | Thomas R. Carper | Acquired @ 98.12 | |||
| 2023-12-04 | John R. Curtis | Disposed @ 97.6 | |||
| 2023-11-21 | Sara Kelly | Disposed 250 @ 104.45 | View | ||
| 2023-11-15 | Rachel Ruggeri | Disposed 504 @ 105.66 | View | ||
| 2023-11-14 | Michael Aaron Conway | Disposed 6500 @ 104.77 | View | ||
| 2023-10-24 | Greg Stanton | Disposed @ 94.62 | |||
| 2023-10-16 | Josh Gottheimer | Acquired @ 93.65 | |||
| 2023-10-03 | Markwayne Mullin | Acquired @ 89.48 | |||
| 2023-09-26 | Greg Stanton | Acquired @ 92 | |||
| 2023-09-15 | Josh Gottheimer | Disposed @ 96.23 |
Monitoring Starbucks' insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Acquired vs Disposed
Filed vs Not Filed
Insider sentiment refers to the collective sentiment or feeling of Starbucks' insiders - typically its officers, directors, and beneficial owners holding more than a certain percentage of the company's stock - about the future prospects of Starbucks. This sentiment is often gauged based on the trading activities of these insiders. If insiders are purchasing more shares of their own company, it may be interpreted as a bullish sentiment, indicating that they believe Starbucks' stock will rise in value. Conversely, if insiders are selling shares, it might be seen as bearish, suggesting they expect the stock price to drop.
Starbucks |
Starbucks' Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Starbucks' future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Starbucks will maintain a workforce of slightly above 381000 employees by May 2024.Starbucks' latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Starbucks, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Starbucks by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
| 2024-02-23 | Senator Shelley M Capito | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
| 2023-12-04 | Representative John Curtis | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2023-09-26 | Representative Greg Stanton | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2023-03-17 | Representative Dan Newhouse | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2023-02-21 | Senator Thomas R. Carper | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2022-09-09 | Representative Scott Franklin | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2022-03-14 | Representative Earl Blumenauer | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2022-01-24 | Representative Richard W. Allen | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2021-09-16 | Representative Katherine M. Clark | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2021-02-16 | Representative Peter Meijer | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2020-11-19 | Representative Kenny Marchant | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
| 2020-11-05 | Senator Bill Cassidy | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2020-06-16 | Representative Mike Garcia | Disposed $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
| 2020-04-30 | Representative David B. McKinley | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2020-04-06 | Senator Ron Wyden | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2020-04-03 | Senator David A Perdue , Jr | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2018-10-02 | Senator Susan M. Collins | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
| 2017-09-26 | Senator Pat Roberts | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2017-07-28 | Senator Sheldon Whitehouse | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 0009-06-09 | Representative Susie Lee | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Starbucks Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1252 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1252 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Starbucks' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Starbucks manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Starbucks' Return On Tangible Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Return On Assets is likely to rise to 0.20 in 2024, whereas Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.18 in 2024. At this time, Starbucks' Total Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Non Current Assets Total is likely to rise to about 26.7 B in 2024, whereas Other Current Assets are likely to drop slightly above 309.8 M in 2024.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to rise to about 1.6 B in 2024. Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to rise to about 4 B in 2024
Starbucks Workforce Comparison
Starbucks is currently regarded as top stock in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Consumer Discretionary industry is at this time estimated at about 547,871. Starbucks totals roughly 381,000 in number of employees claiming about 70% of stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.
Starbucks Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.12 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.15 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.15.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.24 | 0.2974 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.19 | 0.1828 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.088 | 0.1571 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.25 | 0.2338 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.2 | 0.187 |
|
|
Starbucks Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Starbucks insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Starbucks' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Starbucks insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-01 | 1.75 | 14 | 8 | 38,969 | 7,221 |
| 2023-12-01 | 0.5 | 9 | 18 | 178,278 | 58,053 |
| 2023-06-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 11,253 | 2,066 |
| 2023-03-01 | 0.7778 | 7 | 9 | 24,447 | 23,653 |
| 2022-12-01 | 0.375 | 6 | 16 | 166,667 | 40,840 |
| 2022-09-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 64,750 | 303.00 |
| 2022-06-01 | 0.3333 | 3 | 9 | 205,663 | 16,146 |
| 2022-03-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 38,320 | 2,536 |
| 2021-12-01 | 0.7273 | 16 | 22 | 762,784 | 759,673 |
| 2021-09-01 | 0.5833 | 7 | 12 | 511,396 | 1,023,238 |
| 2021-06-01 | 0.2222 | 2 | 9 | 323,290 | 681,638 |
| 2021-03-01 | 1.6364 | 18 | 11 | 194,137 | 284,271 |
| 2020-12-01 | 0.4412 | 15 | 34 | 596,086 | 842,461 |
| 2020-09-01 | 0.5455 | 6 | 11 | 32,754 | 84,253 |
| 2020-06-01 | 0.5 | 6 | 12 | 60,534 | 78,111 |
| 2020-03-01 | 2.0 | 18 | 9 | 117,528 | 28,706 |
| 2019-12-01 | 0.56 | 14 | 25 | 240,987 | 148,920 |
| 2019-09-01 | 0.48 | 12 | 25 | 146,909 | 302,497 |
| 2019-06-01 | 0.4 | 6 | 15 | 116,047 | 251,492 |
| 2019-03-01 | 1.05 | 21 | 20 | 626,413 | 1,156,043 |
| 2018-12-01 | 0.44 | 11 | 25 | 1,337,644 | 1,052,611 |
| 2018-09-01 | 0.6154 | 8 | 13 | 387,287 | 611,340 |
| 2018-06-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 223,599 | 21,749 |
| 2018-03-01 | 0.5455 | 6 | 11 | 265,118 | 530,483 |
| 2017-12-01 | 1.0303 | 34 | 33 | 5,765,623 | 5,207,006 |
| 2017-09-01 | 0.1875 | 3 | 16 | 105,742 | 322,026 |
| 2017-06-01 | 1.125 | 9 | 8 | 236,566 | 309,652 |
| 2017-03-01 | 0.5 | 6 | 12 | 113,346 | 242,386 |
| 2016-12-01 | 0.963 | 26 | 27 | 3,525,732 | 1,905,969 |
| 2016-09-01 | 0.6667 | 4 | 6 | 2,790,308 | 3,412,962 |
| 2016-06-01 | 0.5 | 6 | 12 | 436,518 | 714,859 |
| 2016-03-01 | 0.5625 | 9 | 16 | 280,730 | 395,174 |
| 2015-12-01 | 0.9688 | 31 | 32 | 4,228,764 | 3,001,893 |
| 2015-09-01 | 0.5263 | 10 | 19 | 2,143,150 | 3,590,737 |
| 2015-06-01 | 0.6 | 6 | 10 | 1,170,910 | 1,841,820 |
| 2015-03-01 | 0.5294 | 9 | 17 | 326,927 | 367,408 |
| 2014-12-01 | 1.0588 | 36 | 34 | 2,022,261 | 1,642,991 |
| 2014-09-01 | 0.4167 | 5 | 12 | 1,059,866 | 1,144,732 |
| 2014-06-01 | 0.4 | 4 | 10 | 239,448 | 289,440 |
| 2014-03-01 | 1.3333 | 4 | 3 | 63,920 | 1,929 |
| 2013-12-01 | 0.8788 | 29 | 33 | 1,405,911 | 1,659,461 |
| 2013-09-01 | 0.625 | 10 | 16 | 727,228 | 1,178,366 |
| 2013-06-01 | 0.5882 | 10 | 17 | 713,315 | 1,424,831 |
| 2013-03-01 | 0.5 | 9 | 18 | 210,659 | 1,466,318 |
| 2012-12-01 | 0.8438 | 54 | 64 | 5,835,438 | 10,107,865 |
| 2012-09-01 | 0.4 | 2 | 5 | 45,000 | 101,720 |
| 2012-06-01 | 0.4783 | 11 | 23 | 201,703 | 400,514 |
| 2012-03-01 | 0.56 | 14 | 25 | 2,167,551 | 5,105,802 |
| 2011-12-01 | 0.9459 | 35 | 37 | 2,816,359 | 3,241,116 |
| 2011-09-01 | 0.7368 | 14 | 19 | 268,430 | 506,835 |
| 2011-06-01 | 0.5 | 4 | 8 | 195,000 | 330,711 |
| 2011-03-01 | 0.5625 | 9 | 16 | 3,388,241 | 5,016,993 |
| 2010-12-01 | 1.2593 | 34 | 27 | 1,346,244 | 908,845 |
| 2010-09-01 | 0.4545 | 5 | 11 | 334,509 | 704,218 |
| 2010-06-01 | 0.5833 | 7 | 12 | 229,827 | 496,456 |
| 2009-12-01 | 2.1667 | 26 | 12 | 971,356 | 306,805 |
| 2009-09-01 | 1.0 | 5 | 5 | 275,364 | 75,136 |
| 2009-06-01 | 1.75 | 7 | 4 | 468,484 | 386,044 |
| 2009-03-01 | 0.4167 | 5 | 12 | 149,382 | 213,437 |
| 2008-12-01 | 0.8333 | 20 | 24 | 1,363,585 | 892,453 |
| 2008-09-01 | 1.0 | 6 | 6 | 155,368 | 136,381 |
| 2008-03-01 | 0.25 | 2 | 8 | 199,979 | 188,192 |
| 2007-12-01 | 1.2353 | 21 | 17 | 963,675 | 239,453 |
| 2007-09-01 | 0.3333 | 5 | 15 | 265,099 | 256,193 |
| 2007-06-01 | 0.2632 | 5 | 19 | 74,390 | 140,000 |
| 2007-03-01 | 0.0541 | 8 | 148 | 417,888 | 835,776 |
| 2006-12-01 | 0.5 | 15 | 30 | 781,502 | 508,707 |
| 2006-09-01 | 0.2105 | 4 | 19 | 56,400 | 111,800 |
| 2006-06-01 | 0.0976 | 4 | 41 | 150,000 | 335,000 |
| 2006-03-01 | 0.129 | 4 | 31 | 235,900 | 471,800 |
| 2005-12-01 | 0.4318 | 19 | 44 | 886,344 | 458,103 |
| 2005-09-01 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 | 195,000 | 30,000 |
| 2005-06-01 | 0.1 | 2 | 20 | 30,000 | 60,000 |
| 2005-03-01 | 0.3846 | 5 | 13 | 63,046 | 58,246 |
| 2004-12-01 | 0.0964 | 19 | 197 | 2,622,869 | 3,777,943 |
| 2004-09-01 | 0.3939 | 13 | 33 | 168,400 | 371,400 |
| 2004-06-01 | 0.6667 | 2 | 3 | 213,000 | 26,000 |
| 2004-03-01 | 0.25 | 7 | 28 | 1,054,700 | 1,184,200 |
| 2003-12-01 | 0.4872 | 19 | 39 | 1,042,186 | 444,500 |
| 2003-09-01 | 0.48 | 12 | 25 | 102,728 | 161,982 |
| 2003-06-01 | 3.0 | 6 | 2 | 104,918 | 158,000 |
Starbucks Notable Stakeholders
A Starbucks stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Starbucks often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Starbucks' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Starbucks' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Howard Schultz | Founder, Chairman and CEO | Profile | |
| Paul Mutty | Senior Vice President Interim General Counsel | Profile | |
| Rachel Gonzalez | Executive Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
| Clifford Burrows | Group President of US and Americas | Profile | |
| John Culver | Group President of China and Asia Pacific, Channel Devel. (CPG) and Emerging Brands | Profile | |
| Jill Walker | Senior Vice President Corporate Financial Services, Chief Accounting Officer | Profile | |
| Patrick Grismer | CFO, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Kevin Johnson | President, COO, Director and Member of Performance Compensation Committee | Profile | |
| Scott Maw | CFO and Executive VP | Profile | |
| Deborah Lefevre | Executive CTO | Profile | |
| Gerri MartinFlickinger | CTO | Profile | |
| Lucy Helm | Executive VP, General Counsel and Secretary | Profile | |
| Myron Ullman | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Craig Weatherup | Presiding Independent Director | Profile | |
| Clara Shih | Independent Director | Profile | |
| James Shennan | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Mary Dillon | Director | Profile | |
| Robert Gates | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Joshua Ramo | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Rosalind Brewer | Independent Director | Profile | |
| William Bradley | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Javier Teruel | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Satya Nadella | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Mellody Hobson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Jorgen Knudstorp | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Olden Lee | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Ashish Mishra | Deputy VP | Profile | |
| Bradley Lerman | Executive Counsel | Profile | |
| Aranthan II | Executive Affairs | Profile | |
| Michael Conway | Group Development | Profile | |
| Andy Adams | Senior Development | Profile | |
| Brady Brewer | Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Sara Kelly | Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Zabrina Jenkins | Interim Counsel | Profile | |
| Gina Woods | Ex Impact | Profile | |
| Tiffany Willis | Vice Engagement | Profile | |
| Michelle Burns | Social Coffee | Profile | |
| Dominic Carr | Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Vivek Varma | Ex Affairs | Profile | |
| Laxman Narasimhan | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Emmy Kan | Senior Pacific | Profile | |
| Rachel Ruggeri | CFO VP | Profile |
About Starbucks Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Starbucks often depends on how effective the management is. Starbucks management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Starbucks management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Starbucks management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.23 | 0.24 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.21 | 0.18 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.19 | 0.20 | |
| Return On Equity | 3.86 | 4.06 |
The data published in Starbucks' official financial statements usually reflect Starbucks' business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Starbucks. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Starbucks accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Starbucks' liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Starbucks' financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Starbucks' management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Starbucks' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Starbucks. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Starbucks' management manipulating its earnings.
Starbucks Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Starbucks use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Starbucks within its industry.Starbucks Manpower Efficiency
Return on Starbucks Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 94.4K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 856.6M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 10.8K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 98.2M |
Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Starbucks. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment. For more information on how to buy Starbucks Stock please use our How to Invest in Starbucks guide.You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.
Complementary Tools for Starbucks Stock analysis
When running Starbucks' price analysis, check to measure Starbucks' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Starbucks is operating at the current time. Most of Starbucks' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Starbucks' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Starbucks' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Starbucks to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
| Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
| Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
| Volatility Analysis Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data | |
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
| Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals |
Is Starbucks' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Starbucks. If investors know Starbucks will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Starbucks listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.216 | Dividend Share 2.2 | Earnings Share 3.74 | Revenue Per Share 32.074 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.082 |
The market value of Starbucks is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Starbucks that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Starbucks' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Starbucks' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Starbucks' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Starbucks' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Starbucks' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Starbucks is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Starbucks' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.