Designer Gross Profit from 2010 to 2024
DBI Stock | USD 10.93 0.31 2.92% |
Gross Profit | First Reported 2000-04-30 | Previous Quarter 256.4 M | Current Value 207.4 M | Quarterly Volatility 183.6 M |
Check Designer Brands financial statements over time to gain insight into future company performance. You can evaluate financial statements to find patterns among Designer main balance sheet or income statement drivers, such as Interest Expense of 33.8 M, Selling General Administrative of 578.9 M or Total Revenue of 2.2 B, as well as many exotic indicators such as Short Term Coverage Ratios of 11.75, Price Earnings Ratio of 20.76 or Price To Sales Ratio of 1.28. Designer financial statements analysis is a perfect complement when working with Designer Brands Valuation or Volatility modules.
Designer | Gross Profit |
Latest Designer Brands' Gross Profit Growth Pattern
Below is the plot of the Gross Profit of Designer Brands over the last few years. Gross profit is a required income statement account that reflects total revenue of Designer Brands minus its cost of goods sold. It is profit before Designer Brands operating expenses, interest payments and taxes. Gross profit is also known as gross margin. It is the profit a company makes after deducting the costs associated with making and selling its products, or the costs associated with providing its services. Designer Brands' Gross Profit historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Designer Brands' overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
View | Last Reported 1.08 B | 10 Years Trend |
|
Gross Profit |
Timeline |
Designer Gross Profit Regression Statistics
Arithmetic Mean | 795,422,304 | |
Geometric Mean | 766,923,966 | |
Coefficient Of Variation | 24.80 | |
Mean Deviation | 145,055,397 | |
Median | 768,369,000 | |
Standard Deviation | 197,237,488 | |
Sample Variance | 38902.6T | |
Range | 768M | |
R-Value | 0.35 | |
Mean Square Error | 36897.7T | |
R-Squared | 0.12 | |
Significance | 0.21 | |
Slope | 15,232,300 | |
Total Sum of Squares | 544636.8T |
Designer Gross Profit History
Other Fundumenentals of Designer Brands
Designer Brands Gross Profit component correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
About Designer Brands Financial Statements
There are typically three primary documents that fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Designer Brands income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows. Designer Brands investors use historical funamental indicators, such as Designer Brands's Gross Profit, to determine how well the company is positioned to perform in the future. Although Designer Brands investors may use each financial statement separately, they are all related. The changes in Designer Brands's assets and liabilities, for example, are also reflected in the revenues and expenses that we see on Designer Brands's income statement, which results in the company's gains or losses. Cash flows can provide more information regarding cash listed on a balance sheet, but not equivalent to net income shown on the income statement. We offer a historical overview of the basic patterns found on Designer Brands Financial Statements. Understanding these patterns can help to make the right decision on long term investment in Designer Brands. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.
Last Reported | Projected for 2024 | ||
Gross Profit | 973 M | 673.2 M | |
Gross Profit Margin | 0.32 | 0.30 |
Designer Brands Investors Sentiment
The influence of Designer Brands' investor sentiment on the probability of its price appreciation or decline could be a good factor in your decision-making process regarding taking a position in Designer. The overall investor sentiment generally increases the direction of a stock movement in a one-year investment horizon. However, the impact of investor sentiment on the entire stock market does not have solid backing from leading economists and market statisticians.
Investor biases related to Designer Brands' public news can be used to forecast risks associated with an investment in Designer. The trend in average sentiment can be used to explain how an investor holding Designer can time the market purely based on public headlines and social activities around Designer Brands. Please note that most equities that are difficult to arbitrage are affected by market sentiment the most.
Designer Brands' market sentiment shows the aggregated news analyzed to detect positive and negative mentions from the text and comments. The data is normalized to provide daily scores for Designer Brands' and other traded tickers. The bigger the bubble, the more accurate is the estimated score. Higher bars for a given day show more participation in the average Designer Brands' news discussions. The higher the estimated score, the more favorable is the investor's outlook on Designer Brands.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Designer Brands in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Designer Brands' short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Designer Brands options trading.
Pair Trading with Designer Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Designer Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Designer Stock
0.71 | M | Macys Inc Financial Report 6th of June 2024 | PairCorr |
0.61 | W | Wayfair Financial Report 2nd of May 2024 | PairCorr |
0.77 | DIBS | 1StdibsCom Financial Report 8th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
0.8 | AN | AutoNation Financial Report 18th of April 2024 | PairCorr |
Moving against Designer Stock
0.79 | BGI | Birks Group Upward Rally | PairCorr |
0.78 | EXTO | Almacenes Xito SA | PairCorr |
0.77 | BQ | Boqii Holding Limited | PairCorr |
0.73 | LL | LL Flooring Holdings | PairCorr |
0.69 | BIG | Big Lots Financial Report 24th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Designer Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Designer Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Designer Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Designer Brands to buy it.
The correlation of Designer Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Designer Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Designer Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Designer Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out the analysis of Designer Brands Correlation against competitors. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.Note that the Designer Brands information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Designer Brands' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.
Complementary Tools for Designer Stock analysis
When running Designer Brands' price analysis, check to measure Designer Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Designer Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Designer Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Designer Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Designer Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Designer Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
Portfolio Anywhere Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device |
Is Designer Brands' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Designer Brands. If investors know Designer will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Designer Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.74) | Dividend Share 0.2 | Earnings Share 0.46 | Revenue Per Share 50.166 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.01) |
The market value of Designer Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Designer that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Designer Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Designer Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Designer Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Designer Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Designer Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Designer Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Designer Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.