KINDER Financials

Please note, the presentation of KINDER's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, KINDER's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in KINDER's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of KINDER MORGAN ENERGY. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of KINDER's management manipulating its earnings.

KINDER's systematic risk plays a vital role in portfolio allocation when considering its stock to be added to a well-diversified portfolio. KINDER volatility which cannot be eliminated through diversification, requires returns over the risk-free rate. Over the long run, a well-diversified portfolio provides returns that match its exposure to systematic risk. In this case, investors face a trade-off between expected returns and systematic risk and, therefore, can only reduce a portfolio's exposure to systematic risk by sacrificing expected returns on the portfolio.

The output start index for this execution was twelve with a total number of output elements of fourty-nine. The Beta measures systematic risk based on how returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY correlated with the market. If Beta is less than 0 KINDER generally moves in the opposite direction as compared to the market. If KINDER Beta is about zero movement of price series is uncorrelated with the movement of the benchmark. if Beta is between zero and one KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is generally moves in the same direction as, but less than the movement of the market. For Beta = 1 movement of KINDER is generally in the same direction as the market. If Beta > 1 KINDER moves generally in the same direction as, but more than the movement of the benchmark.