Construction Partners Current Financial Leverage
ROAD Stock | USD 50.96 0.71 1.37% |
Construction Partners holds a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.847. At present, Construction Partners' Net Debt is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Long Term Debt is expected to grow to about 435.6 M, whereas Short Term Debt is forecasted to decline to about 14.5 M. Construction Partners' financial risk is the risk to Construction Partners stockholders that is caused by an increase in debt. In other words, with a high degree of financial leverage come high-interest payments, which usually reduce Earnings Per Share (EPS).
Asset vs Debt
Equity vs Debt
Construction Partners' liquidity is one of the most fundamental aspects of both its future profitability and its ability to meet different types of ongoing financial obligations. Construction Partners' cash, liquid assets, total liabilities, and shareholder equity can be utilized to evaluate how much leverage the Company is using to sustain its current operations. For traders, higher-leverage indicators usually imply a higher risk to shareholders. In addition, it helps Construction Stock's retail investors understand whether an upcoming fall or rise in the market will negatively affect Construction Partners' stakeholders.
For most companies, including Construction Partners, marketable securities, inventories, and receivables are the most common assets that could be converted to cash. However, for the executing running Construction Partners the most critical issue when dealing with liquidity needs is whether the current assets are properly aligned with its current liabilities. If not, management will need to obtain alternative financing to ensure that there are always enough cash equivalents on the balance sheet in reserve to pay for obligations.
Price Book 5.6471 | Book Value 9.865 | Operating Margin 0.0414 | Profit Margin 0.0352 | Return On Assets 0.0487 |
Construction |
Construction Partners Financial Leverage Rating
Construction Partners bond ratings play a critical role in determining how much Construction Partners have to pay to access credit markets, i.e., the amount of interest on their issued debt. The threshold between investment-grade and speculative-grade ratings has important market implications for Construction Partners' borrowing costs.Construction Partners Debt to Cash Allocation
As Construction Partners follows its natural business cycle, the capital allocation decisions will not magically go away. Construction Partners' decision-makers have to determine if most of the cash flows will be poured back into or reinvested in the business, reserved for other projects beyond operational needs, or paid back to stakeholders and investors. Many companies eventually find out that there is only so much market out there to be conquered, and adding the next product or service is only half as profitable per unit as their current endeavors. Eventually, the company will reach a point where cash flows are strong, and extra cash is available but not fully utilized. In this case, the company may start buying back its stock from the public or issue more dividends.
The company currently holds 390.73 M in liabilities with Debt to Equity (D/E) ratio of 0.85, which is about average as compared to similar companies. Construction Partners has a current ratio of 1.87, which is within standard range for the sector. Debt can assist Construction Partners until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Construction Partners' shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Construction Partners sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Construction to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Construction Partners' use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.Construction Partners Total Assets Over Time
Construction Partners Assets Financed by Debt
Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the Construction Partners' operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of Construction Partners, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility. Like all other financial ratios, a a Construction Partners debt ratio should be compared their industry average or other competing firms.Construction Short Long Term Debt Total
Short Long Term Debt Total |
|
Understaning Construction Partners Use of Financial Leverage
Construction Partners financial leverage ratio helps in determining the effect of debt on the overall profitability of the company. It measures Construction Partners's total debt position, including all of outstanding debt obligations, and compares it with the equity. In simple terms, the high financial leverage means the cost of production, together with running the business day-to-day, is high, whereas, lower financial leverage implies lower fixed cost investment in the business and generally considered by investors to be a good sign. So if creditors own a majority of Construction Partners assets, the company is considered highly leveraged. Understanding the composition and structure of overall Construction Partners debt and outstanding corporate bonds gives a good idea of how risky the capital structure of a business and if it is worth investing in it. Financial leverage can amplify the potential profits to Construction Partners' owners, but it also increases the potential losses and risk of financial distress, including bankruptcy, if the firm cannot cover its debt costs. The degree of Construction Partners' financial leverage can be measured in several ways, including by ratios such as the debt-to-equity ratio (total debt / total equity), equity multiplier (total assets / total equity), or the debt ratio (total debt / total assets).
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Short and Long Term Debt Total | 449.3 M | 471.8 M | |
Net Debt | 393.9 M | 413.5 M | |
Long Term Debt | 414.9 M | 435.6 M | |
Long Term Debt Total | 417.5 M | 438.4 M | |
Short and Long Term Debt | 17.2 M | 13.4 M | |
Short Term Debt | 19.9 M | 14.5 M | |
Net Debt To EBITDA | 2.06 | 2.17 | |
Debt To Equity | 0.68 | 0.35 | |
Interest Debt Per Share | 7.03 | 7.38 | |
Debt To Assets | 0.29 | 0.17 | |
Long Term Debt To Capitalization | 0.38 | 0.21 | |
Total Debt To Capitalization | 0.39 | 0.23 | |
Debt Equity Ratio | 0.68 | 0.35 | |
Debt Ratio | 0.29 | 0.17 | |
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio | 0.46 | 0.76 |
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
When determining whether Construction Partners is a strong investment it is important to analyze Construction Partners' competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Construction Partners' future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Construction Stock, refer to the following important reports:Check out the analysis of Construction Partners Fundamentals Over Time. For information on how to trade Construction Stock refer to our How to Trade Construction Stock guide.Note that the Construction Partners information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Construction Partners' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.
Complementary Tools for Construction Stock analysis
When running Construction Partners' price analysis, check to measure Construction Partners' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Construction Partners is operating at the current time. Most of Construction Partners' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Construction Partners' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Construction Partners' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Construction Partners to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data |
Is Construction Partners' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Construction Partners. If investors know Construction will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Construction Partners listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 4.196 | Earnings Share 1.09 | Revenue Per Share 31.214 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.16 | Return On Assets 0.0487 |
The market value of Construction Partners is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Construction that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Construction Partners' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Construction Partners' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Construction Partners' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Construction Partners' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Construction Partners' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Construction Partners is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Construction Partners' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.
What is Financial Leverage?
Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.Leverage and Capital Costs
The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.Benefits of Financial Leverage
Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:- Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
- It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
- Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.