Microsoft Company Insiders
MSFT Stock | USD 400.96 1.84 0.46% |
Slightly above 85 percent of Microsoft's insiders are selling. The analysis of insider sentiment suggests that a fairly large number of Microsoft insiders are, at present, terrified. Microsoft employs about 221 K people. The company is managed by 37 executives with a total tenure of roughly 252 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 5972.97 employees per reported executive.
Satya Nadella CEO CEO and Director |
John Thompson Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
Microsoft's Insider Buying Vs Selling
15
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-03-11 | Kathleen T Hogan | Disposed 21955 @ 403.96 | View | ||
2024-02-29 | Suzan K. DelBene | Disposed @ 413.64 | |||
2024-02-22 | Corp Microsoft | Disposed 1000000 @ 1.95 | View | ||
2024-02-13 | Josh Gottheimer | Disposed @ 406.32 | |||
2024-02-12 | Josh Gottheimer | Disposed @ 415.26 | |||
2024-02-08 | Josh Gottheimer | Disposed @ 414.11 | |||
2024-02-07 | Pete Sessions | Acquired @ 414.05 | |||
2024-02-05 | Bradford L Smith | Disposed 3303 @ 406.12 | View | ||
2024-02-02 | Bradford L Smith | Disposed 45000 @ 411.78 | View | ||
2024-01-25 | Shri Thanedar | Disposed @ 404.87 | |||
2024-01-23 | Kathy E. Manning | Acquired @ 398.9 | |||
2024-01-19 | Blake D. Moore | Disposed @ 398.67 | |||
2024-01-18 | Josh Gottheimer | Disposed @ 393.87 |
Monitoring Microsoft's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Acquired vs Disposed
Filed vs Not Filed
Insider sentiment refers to the collective sentiment or feeling of Microsoft's insiders - typically its officers, directors, and beneficial owners holding more than a certain percentage of the company's stock - about the future prospects of Microsoft. This sentiment is often gauged based on the trading activities of these insiders. If insiders are purchasing more shares of their own company, it may be interpreted as a bullish sentiment, indicating that they believe Microsoft's stock will rise in value. Conversely, if insiders are selling shares, it might be seen as bearish, suggesting they expect the stock price to drop.
Microsoft |
Microsoft's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Microsoft's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Microsoft will maintain a workforce of slightly above 221000 employees by May 2024.Microsoft's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Microsoft, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Microsoft by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2024-01-19 | Representative Blake Moore | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
2023-10-24 | Representative Greg Stanton | Disposed $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2023-09-11 | Representative C. Scott Franklin | Disposed $15,001 - | Verify | ||
2022-03-08 | Representative Dan Newhouse | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2021-05-03 | Representative Ed Case | Acquired $50K to $100K | Verify | ||
2020-09-10 | Representative Francis Rooney | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-08-28 | Representative David B. McKinley | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-07-31 | Senator Ron Wyden | Acquired $50K to $100K | Verify | ||
2020-04-14 | Senator David A Perdue , Jr | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2020-04-06 | Representative Susan W. Brooks | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-03-19 | Senator Kelly Loeffler | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2020-03-18 | Representative Gilbert Cisneros | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-03-03 | Representative Earl Blumenauer | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2019-12-18 | Representative John B. Larson | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
2019-08-26 | Representative Richard W. Allen | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2019-02-28 | Senator Jack Reed | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2019-01-29 | Senator James M Inhofe | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2019-01-08 | Representative K. Michael Conaway | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2016-01-06 | Senator Sheldon Whitehouse | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2014-04-03 | Senator Susan M. Collins | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Microsoft Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1519 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1519 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.3917 %, meaning that it created $0.3917 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Microsoft's Return On Capital Employed is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Assets is likely to gain to 0.20 in 2024, whereas Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.22 in 2024. At this time, Microsoft's Total Current Liabilities is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to gain to about 497.5 B in 2024, whereas Change To Liabilities is likely to drop slightly above 6.9 B in 2024.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to gain to about 7.2 B in 2024. Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to gain to about 87.4 B in 2024
Microsoft Workforce Comparison
Microsoft is considered to be number one stock in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Information Technology industry is now estimated at about 281,445. Microsoft totals roughly 221,000 in number of employees claiming about 79% of equities under Information Technology industry.
Microsoft Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.36 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.44 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.44.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.87 | 0.79 |
|
| |||||
Net Profit Margin | 0.22 | 0.31 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.4 | 0.48 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.42 | 0.48 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.2 | 0.1756 |
|
| |||||
Return On Equity | 0.24 | 0.32 |
|
|
Microsoft Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Microsoft insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Microsoft's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Microsoft insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-03-01 | 0.8947 | 17 | 19 | 2,241 | 101,663 |
2023-12-01 | 1.5 | 21 | 14 | 2,531 | 59,075 |
2023-09-01 | 1.3077 | 34 | 26 | 394,528 | 269,949 |
2023-06-01 | 1.4286 | 20 | 14 | 2,755 | 65,413 |
2023-03-01 | 1.5385 | 20 | 13 | 3,703 | 29,909 |
2022-12-01 | 1.6154 | 21 | 13 | 3,873 | 39,522 |
2022-09-01 | 1.2143 | 34 | 28 | 533,683 | 376,490 |
2022-06-01 | 4.2 | 21 | 5 | 3,444 | 3,152 |
2022-03-01 | 1.6429 | 23 | 14 | 6,708 | 113,762 |
2021-12-01 | 0.7308 | 19 | 26 | 6,731 | 965,527 |
2021-09-01 | 1.28 | 32 | 25 | 609,582 | 416,056 |
2021-06-01 | 1.5833 | 19 | 12 | 12,246 | 87,208 |
2021-03-01 | 1.3125 | 21 | 16 | 907,795 | 694,922 |
2020-12-01 | 2.3333 | 21 | 9 | 104,198 | 291,470 |
2020-09-01 | 1.1786 | 33 | 28 | 1,065,320 | 822,676 |
2020-06-01 | 2.1 | 21 | 10 | 18,210 | 81,900 |
2020-03-01 | 0.6897 | 20 | 29 | 956,967 | 821,805 |
2019-12-01 | 1.3125 | 21 | 16 | 5,692 | 106,984 |
2019-09-01 | 1.2333 | 37 | 30 | 1,180,574 | 759,805 |
2019-06-01 | 2.0 | 20 | 10 | 6,208 | 232,244 |
2019-03-01 | 1.1 | 22 | 20 | 908,758 | 756,936 |
2018-12-01 | 1.5 | 21 | 14 | 8,580 | 298,573 |
2018-09-01 | 1.0909 | 36 | 33 | 1,628,442 | 1,416,509 |
2018-06-01 | 3.1429 | 22 | 7 | 14,637 | 22,244 |
2018-03-01 | 1.5 | 21 | 14 | 9,537 | 70,167 |
2017-12-01 | 1.4615 | 19 | 13 | 9,560 | 134,914 |
2017-09-01 | 0.7778 | 28 | 36 | 415,702 | 7,435,018 |
2017-06-01 | 0.95 | 19 | 20 | 26,207 | 15,075,519 |
2017-03-01 | 0.5333 | 16 | 30 | 10,481 | 23,680,702 |
2016-12-01 | 1.4167 | 17 | 12 | 76,323 | 8,074,311 |
2016-09-01 | 0.7941 | 27 | 34 | 634,443 | 26,635,042 |
2016-06-01 | 0.9375 | 15 | 16 | 11,749 | 8,106,576 |
2016-03-01 | 0.9474 | 18 | 19 | 13,307 | 8,040,055 |
2015-12-01 | 0.6667 | 12 | 18 | 8,111 | 26,884,776 |
2015-09-01 | 1.1053 | 21 | 19 | 753,766 | 8,528,179 |
2015-06-01 | 0.8571 | 12 | 14 | 9,382 | 8,074,052 |
2015-03-01 | 1.3571 | 19 | 14 | 1,067,409 | 8,038,940 |
2014-12-01 | 1.0 | 15 | 15 | 30,341 | 51,058,987 |
2014-09-01 | 1.0 | 26 | 26 | 1,321,356 | 20,705,924 |
2014-06-01 | 1.1875 | 19 | 16 | 3,077,398 | 20,111,786 |
2014-03-01 | 1.0 | 18 | 18 | 99,242 | 20,106,840 |
2013-12-01 | 0.72 | 18 | 25 | 165,386 | 20,578,247 |
2013-09-01 | 1.0 | 24 | 24 | 1,669,222 | 20,762,103 |
2013-06-01 | 1.6667 | 15 | 9 | 196,214 | 23,016,476 |
2013-03-01 | 1.2727 | 14 | 11 | 36,191 | 20,093,335 |
2012-12-01 | 1.25 | 15 | 12 | 17,945 | 20,615,444 |
2012-09-01 | 1.0588 | 36 | 34 | 2,598,297 | 20,876,632 |
2012-06-01 | 1.9 | 19 | 10 | 47,662 | 20,006,424 |
2012-03-01 | 1.0 | 15 | 15 | 201,892 | 20,571,011 |
2011-12-01 | 1.1538 | 15 | 13 | 625,534 | 21,359,003 |
2011-09-01 | 0.6316 | 24 | 38 | 1,370,954 | 20,907,177 |
2011-06-01 | 1.4 | 14 | 10 | 70,691 | 20,085,012 |
2011-03-01 | 0.6341 | 26 | 41 | 978,685 | 22,328,453 |
2010-12-01 | 0.463 | 25 | 54 | 739,613 | 96,739,543 |
2010-09-01 | 0.5116 | 22 | 43 | 1,104,060 | 20,820,573 |
2010-06-01 | 0.5484 | 17 | 31 | 2,765,097 | 25,532,015 |
2010-03-01 | 1.0769 | 14 | 13 | 110,215 | 20,233,880 |
2009-12-01 | 0.561 | 23 | 41 | 2,941,673 | 38,280,616 |
2009-09-01 | 0.6744 | 29 | 43 | 1,275,286 | 20,636,993 |
2009-06-01 | 0.5 | 15 | 30 | 15,464 | 20,281,852 |
2009-03-01 | 1.3636 | 15 | 11 | 409,768 | 20,000,000 |
2008-12-01 | 0.8667 | 13 | 15 | 13,704 | 20,010,000 |
2008-09-01 | 0.9362 | 44 | 47 | 2,103,911 | 21,002,938 |
2008-06-01 | 0.0366 | 14 | 382 | 159,704 | 20,368,297 |
2008-03-01 | 1.875 | 15 | 8 | 94,974 | 82,060 |
2007-12-01 | 0.0225 | 12 | 533 | 544,569 | 46,643,978 |
2007-09-01 | 0.0249 | 15 | 602 | 534,054 | 20,454,002 |
2007-06-01 | 0.0332 | 8 | 241 | 371,808 | 20,948,799 |
2007-03-01 | 0.0218 | 11 | 504 | 30,586 | 20,000,000 |
2006-12-01 | 0.0221 | 7 | 317 | 211,179 | 20,913,497 |
2006-09-01 | 0.0494 | 16 | 324 | 3,381,704 | 23,266,557 |
2006-06-01 | 0.6667 | 6 | 9 | 35,099 | 5,193 |
2006-03-01 | 0.0932 | 22 | 236 | 1,038,993 | 24,078,943 |
2005-12-01 | 0.0723 | 18 | 249 | 1,873,861 | 24,818,674 |
2005-09-01 | 0.0608 | 16 | 263 | 899,154 | 22,829,384 |
2005-06-01 | 0.0714 | 12 | 168 | 704,997 | 24,358,213 |
2005-03-01 | 0.1045 | 14 | 134 | 898,333 | 32,378,957 |
2004-12-01 | 0.0698 | 15 | 215 | 1,853,259 | 25,126,162 |
2004-09-01 | 0.0923 | 25 | 271 | 575,854 | 22,356,344 |
2004-06-01 | 0.024 | 8 | 334 | 416,132 | 25,650,783 |
2004-03-01 | 0.0484 | 15 | 310 | 2,982,912 | 25,413,944 |
2003-12-01 | 0.0173 | 4 | 231 | 110,486 | 30,217,067 |
2003-09-01 | 0.0552 | 36 | 652 | 2,109,470 | 23,629,352 |
2002-09-01 | 17.0 | 17 | 1 | 11,250,000 | 320,000 |
2000-06-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 10.00 | 27,500 |
Microsoft Notable Stakeholders
A Microsoft stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Microsoft often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Microsoft's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Microsoft's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Satya Nadella | CEO and Director | Profile | |
Bradford LCA | President Chairman | Profile | |
John Thompson | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Sean Ventura | Vice President - Information Security, Chief Information Security Officer | Profile | |
JeanPhilippe Courtois | Executive Vice President and President - Microsoft Global Sales, Marketing and Operations | Profile | |
Christopher Capossela | Executive Vice President Chief Marketing Officer | Profile | |
Margaret Johnson | Executive Vice President - Business Development | Profile | |
Bradford Smith | Executive Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
Keith Lorizio | Vice President - North America Sales | Profile | |
Kathleen Hogan | Executive Vice President - Human Resources | Profile | |
Amy Hood | CFO and Executive VP | Profile | |
Brian Turner | COO | Profile | |
Kevin Scott | CTO | Profile | |
James Scott | Executive CTO | Profile | |
Ifeanyi Amah | CTO | Profile | |
Charles Scharf | Director | Profile | |
Helmut Panke | Independent Director | Profile | |
Penny Pritzker | Independent Director | Profile | |
Sandra Peterson | Independent Director | Profile | |
Teri ListStoll | Independent Director | Profile | |
Charles Noski | Independent Director | Profile | |
William Gates | Founder and Technology Advisor, Director | Profile | |
Mason Morfit | Independent Director | Profile | |
Padmasree Warrior | Independent Director | Profile | |
Hugh Johnston | Director | Profile | |
Arne Sorenson | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Stanton | Director | Profile | |
Reid Hoffman | Director | Profile | |
Hossein Nowbar | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Christopher Young | Strategy Development | Profile | |
Takeshi Numoto | Executive Officer | Profile | |
Chris Suh | General Manager - Investor Relations | Profile | |
Judson Althoff | Executive Officer | Profile | |
Frank Shaw | Corp Communications | Profile | |
Brett Iversen | Vice Relations | Profile | |
Keith Esq | Deputy VP | Profile | |
Alice Jolla | Corporate Officer | Profile |
About Microsoft Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Microsoft often depends on how effective the management is. Microsoft management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Microsoft management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Microsoft management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.25 | 0.22 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.33 | 0.36 | |
Return On Assets | 0.18 | 0.20 | |
Return On Equity | 0.32 | 0.24 |
The data published in Microsoft's official financial statements usually reflect Microsoft's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Microsoft. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Microsoft accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Microsoft's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Software space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Microsoft's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Microsoft's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Microsoft's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Microsoft. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Microsoft's management manipulating its earnings.
Microsoft Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Microsoft use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Microsoft within its industry.Microsoft Manpower Efficiency
Return on Microsoft Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 958.9K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 5.7B | |
Net Income Per Employee | 327.4K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 2B | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 362.5K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 2.2B |
Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Microsoft. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in census. For more information on how to buy Microsoft Stock please use our How to Invest in Microsoft guide.Note that the Microsoft information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Microsoft's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.
Complementary Tools for Microsoft Stock analysis
When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device |
Is Microsoft's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Microsoft. If investors know Microsoft will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Microsoft listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.332 | Dividend Share 2.86 | Earnings Share 11.06 | Revenue Per Share 30.612 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.176 |
The market value of Microsoft is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Microsoft that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Microsoft's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Microsoft's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Microsoft's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Microsoft's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Microsoft's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Microsoft is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Microsoft's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.