US Silica Company Insiders
SLCA Stock | USD 12.85 0.12 0.93% |
US Silica's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading US Silica Holdings stock suggests that vertually all insiders are panicking at this time. US Silica employs about 1.9 K people. The company is managed by 35 executives with a total tenure of roughly 198 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 53.51 employees per reported executive.
Bryan Shinn CEO CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee |
Charles Shaver Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
US Silica's Insider Buying Vs Selling
0
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-04-03 | James Derek Ussery | Disposed 46433 @ 14 | View | ||
2024-03-11 | Stacy Russell | Disposed 20000 @ 12 | View | ||
2023-09-12 | Bryan Adair Shinn | Disposed 41501 @ 14.06 | View |
Monitoring US Silica's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
SLCA |
US Silica's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with US Silica's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that SLCA will maintain a workforce of about 1870 employees by May 2024.US Silica Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0803 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0803 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.1878 %, meaning that it created $0.1878 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. US Silica's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well US Silica manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At present, US Silica's Return On Tangible Assets are projected to slightly decrease based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Return On Assets is expected to grow to 0.07, whereas Return On Capital Employed is forecasted to decline to 0.08. At present, US Silica's Non Currrent Assets Other are projected to decrease significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Other Current Assets is expected to grow to about 21.4 M, whereas Total Assets are forecasted to decline to about 1.8 B.The current year's Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to grow to about 73.9 M, whereas Common Stock Shares Outstanding is forecasted to decline to about 70 M.
US Silica Workforce Comparison
US Silica Holdings is rated below average in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Energy industry is at this time estimated at about 25,575. US Silica holds roughly 1,873 in number of employees claiming about 7% of equities under Energy industry.
US Silica Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.09 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.13 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.13.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.33 | 0.254 |
|
|
US Silica Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific US Silica insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on US Silica's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, US Silica insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-03-01 | 0.5714 | 12 | 21 | 871,487 | 310,927 |
2023-12-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 9,001 | 340.00 |
2023-09-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 78,378 | 48,060 |
2023-03-01 | 0.44 | 11 | 25 | 1,624,853 | 767,054 |
2022-06-01 | 1.6667 | 5 | 3 | 40,001 | 21,897 |
2022-03-01 | 1.0769 | 14 | 13 | 638,069 | 182,645 |
2021-12-01 | 1.625 | 13 | 8 | 279,439 | 288,009 |
2021-06-01 | 0.8667 | 13 | 15 | 141,473 | 139,148 |
2021-03-01 | 0.5333 | 8 | 15 | 427,845 | 118,999 |
2020-06-01 | 0.8182 | 18 | 22 | 638,271 | 61,617 |
2020-03-01 | 1.6667 | 15 | 9 | 1,042,677 | 37,356 |
2019-12-01 | 2.6667 | 8 | 3 | 72,521 | 9,677 |
2019-06-01 | 0.8 | 24 | 30 | 131,510 | 86,970 |
2019-03-01 | 1.1111 | 20 | 18 | 566,640 | 162,197 |
2018-12-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 39,881 | 17,391 |
2018-06-01 | 0.8293 | 34 | 41 | 200,503 | 102,856 |
2018-03-01 | 0.6563 | 21 | 32 | 119,042 | 123,650 |
2017-12-01 | 1.25 | 5 | 4 | 19,948 | 37,206 |
2017-06-01 | 1.1429 | 24 | 21 | 116,940 | 70,319 |
2017-03-01 | 0.52 | 26 | 50 | 123,243 | 168,727 |
2016-12-01 | 1.25 | 5 | 4 | 36,697 | 30,030 |
2016-09-01 | 0.5 | 9 | 18 | 155,133 | 245,470 |
2016-06-01 | 0.5652 | 13 | 23 | 47,178 | 41,324 |
2016-03-01 | 0.7321 | 41 | 56 | 313,980 | 83,042 |
2015-12-01 | 0.6667 | 2 | 3 | 37,812 | 12,269 |
2015-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 20,000 | 545.00 |
2015-06-01 | 2.0909 | 23 | 11 | 300,987 | 13,206 |
2015-03-01 | 1.1628 | 50 | 43 | 274,755 | 57,496 |
2014-12-01 | 10.0 | 20 | 2 | 241,967 | 2,269 |
2014-09-01 | 0.3 | 3 | 10 | 6,000 | 19,405 |
2014-06-01 | 0.4444 | 8 | 18 | 41,070 | 72,685 |
2014-03-01 | 0.9444 | 34 | 36 | 187,118 | 224,861 |
2013-12-01 | 0.1795 | 7 | 39 | 36,890 | 94,234,352 |
2013-09-01 | 0.4595 | 17 | 37 | 203,274 | 415,694 |
2013-06-01 | 0.6522 | 15 | 23 | 125,114 | 82,960,203 |
2013-03-01 | 0.1667 | 1 | 6 | 10,000 | 58,650,000 |
2012-03-01 | 0.1667 | 5 | 30 | 16,500 | 62,694,444 |
US Silica Notable Stakeholders
An US Silica stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as US Silica often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. US Silica's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting US Silica's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Bryan Shinn | CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee | Profile | |
Charles Shaver | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Billy Smith | Senior Vice President and President Oil & Gas | Profile | |
Donald Merril | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
David Murry | Chief Human Resource Officer, Vice President - Talent Management | Profile | |
John Blanchard | Senior Vice President and President - Industrial & Specialty Products | Profile | |
Andrew Macan | Senior Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
Don Weinheimer | Vice President and General Manager - Oil and Gas | Profile | |
Stacy Russell | Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
Michael Winkler | Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Jay Moreau | Executive COO | Profile | |
Michael Stice | Independent Director | Profile | |
Diane Duren | Independent Director | Profile | |
Peter Bernard | Independent Director | Profile | |
Daniel Avramovich | Independent Director | Profile | |
Michael Lawson | Director of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications | Profile | |
Bonnie Lind | Independent Director | Profile | |
William Kacal | Independent Director | Profile | |
Adam Yoxtheimer | Chief Admin. Officer and VP | Profile | |
Jason Tedrow | VP of Supply Chain, Growth and Devel. | Profile | |
Eugene Padgett | Chief VP | Profile | |
Bradford Casper | Chief Commercial Officer and VP | Profile | |
Kevin Hough | VP Controller | Profile | |
Zach Carusona | Senior Vice President and Presidentident - Specialty Minerals | Profile | |
Ida Ashley | Vice Resources | Profile | |
Christine Marshall | General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
J Ussery | Senior Vice President and Presidentident - Oil and Gas | Profile | |
Derek Ussery | Executive Gas | Profile | |
J Stice | Independent Director | Profile | |
Sandra Rogers | Independent Director | Profile | |
Patricia Gil | Vice Relations | Profile | |
Donna Crowder | VP Officer | Profile | |
D Crowder | Senior Vice President Chief Human Resource Officer | Profile | |
Daniel Miers | Senior Vice President and Presidentident - SandBox Logistics | Profile | |
Arjun Sreekumar | Manager Relations | Profile |
About US Silica Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as US Silica Holdings often depends on how effective the management is. US Silica management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of SLCA management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the SLCA management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.08 | 0.09 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.14 | 0.08 | |
Return On Assets | 0.07 | 0.07 | |
Return On Equity | 0.17 | 0.18 |
The data published in US Silica's official financial statements usually reflect US Silica's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of US Silica Holdings. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by SLCA accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what US Silica's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Energy Equipment & Services space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of US Silica's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, US Silica's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in US Silica's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of US Silica Holdings. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of US Silica's management manipulating its earnings.
US Silica Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as US Silica use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare US Silica within its industry.US Silica Manpower Efficiency
Return on US Silica Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 828.6K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 44.3M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 78.2K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 4.2M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 221.5K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 11.9M |
Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in US Silica Holdings. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators. Note that the US Silica Holdings information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other US Silica's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.
Complementary Tools for SLCA Stock analysis
When running US Silica's price analysis, check to measure US Silica's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy US Silica is operating at the current time. Most of US Silica's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of US Silica's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move US Silica's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of US Silica to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
Portfolio Dashboard Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments | |
Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Earnings Calls Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges | |
Volatility Analysis Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data | |
Crypto Correlations Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins |
Is US Silica's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of US Silica. If investors know SLCA will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about US Silica listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.09) | Earnings Share 1.87 | Revenue Per Share 20.161 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.19) | Return On Assets 0.0803 |
The market value of US Silica Holdings is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of SLCA that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of US Silica's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is US Silica's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because US Silica's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect US Silica's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between US Silica's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if US Silica is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, US Silica's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.