Katharine Wolanyk - Acacia Research Independent Director
| ACTG Stock | USD 4.82 0.11 2.23% |
Director
Ms. Katharine Wolanyk is Independent Director of the Company. Ms. Wolanyk career spans the business, legal and engineering fields, with a particular focus in intellectual property. She is a Managing Director at Burford Capital, a leading global finance and investment management firm focused on law with over 3 billion committed to the legal market. She was named a World Leading IP Strategist by Intellectual Asset Management in 2015 through 2018 and has deep experience within the technology industry. Ms. Wolanyk leads Burford intellectual property business as well as its Chicago office. Burford is one of the top performing listings on the London Stock Exchange AIM market, with a current market capitalization of more than 4.5 billion. Prior to joining Burford, Ms. Wolanyk was President, Chief Legal Officer and a board member of Soverain Software, an enterprise software company whose patent portfolio was licensed extensively in the software and Internet retailing industries. Ms. Wolanyk was also intellectual property counsel to a publicly traded IT solutions firm, General Counsel of a managed hosting provider, Senior Vice President of corporate development at a publicly traded enterprise software company, a corporate attorney at Latham Watkins LLP, and began her career as a systems engineer at Hughes Aircraft Company since 2019.
| Tenure | 5 years |
| Phone | 332 236 8500 |
| Web | https://www.acaciaresearch.com |
Acacia Research Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0247 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0247 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.1539 %, meaning that it created $0.1539 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Acacia Research's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Acacia Research manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| John Hartnett | HNI Corp | 60 | |
| Thomas Price | Ennis Inc | 77 | |
| Godfrey Long | Ennis Inc | 78 | |
| Gary Mozina | Ennis Inc | 61 | |
| Dhanusha Sivajee | HNI Corp | 43 | |
| Alejandro Pradrazzi | Ennis Inc | 67 | |
| Linda Williams | Steelcase | 50 | |
| Connie Duckworth | Steelcase | 65 | |
| Mark Rajkowski | Acco Brands | 59 | |
| Peter Wege | Steelcase | 71 | |
| Cathy Ross | Steelcase | 63 | |
| Todd Kelsey | Steelcase | 55 | |
| Alejandro Quiroz | Ennis Inc | 61 | |
| George Bayly | Acco Brands | 73 | |
| Graciela Monteagudo | Acco Brands | 54 | |
| William Crawford | Steelcase | 72 | |
| James Buzzard | Acco Brands | 65 | |
| Mary Bell | HNI Corp | 60 | |
| Michael Norkus | Acco Brands | 67 | |
| Ronald Lombardi | Acco Brands | 57 | |
| Ronald Waters | HNI Corp | 69 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.15 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0247 |
Acacia Research Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Acacia Research's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Acacia Research inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Acacia. The board's role is to monitor Acacia Research's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Acacia Research's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Acacia Research's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Paul Falzone, Independent Director | ||
| Wesley Golby, Chief Officer | ||
| Robert Stewart, President | ||
| Robert Rasamny, Chief Officer | ||
| William Anderson, Independent Director | ||
| Bryan Alterman, Principal | ||
| Marvin Key, Interim CEO and CEO of Acacia Research Group Llc | ||
| Luis Rinaldini, Director | ||
| Fred deBoom, Independent Director | ||
| Richard Rosenstein, Chief Officer | ||
| Clifford Press, Director | ||
| Kirsten Hoover, Principal Controller | ||
| Alfred Tobia, Director | ||
| Irene Byrne, VP Resources | ||
| Darren Miller, VP Legal | ||
| Frank Walsh, Director | ||
| James Sanders, Independent Director | ||
| Jason Soncini, General Counsel | ||
| Allen Bradley, Independent Director | ||
| Martin McNulty, Interim Officer | ||
| Jennifer Graff, Corporate Secretary | ||
| Maureen OConnell, Independent Director | ||
| Marc Booth, Chief Intellectual Property Officer | ||
| Holly Hernandez, VP Licensing | ||
| Joseph Davis, Independent Director | ||
| Katharine Wolanyk, Independent Director | ||
| G Graziadio, Independent Director | ||
| Clayton Haynes, CFO, Sr. VP of Fin., Treasurer and Member of Disclosure Committee | ||
| Edward Frykman, Independent Director | ||
| Daniel Troy, Principal | ||
| Isaac Kohlberg, Director | ||
| Louis Graziadio, Executive Chairman of the Board | ||
| Clifford Bradley, Independent Director | ||
| Phillip Mitchell, VP Engineering | ||
| Robert Harris, Executive Chairman of the Board | ||
| Eric Lucas, VP Licensing | ||
| Edward Treska, Sr. VP - Legal, General Counsel, Secretary and Member of Disclosure Committee |
Acacia Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Acacia Research a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.15 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0247 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.54 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.64 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 87.43 M | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 99.9 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 2.04 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 87.48 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 625.89 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 2.65 X |
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Acacia Research in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Acacia Research's short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Acacia Research options trading.
Pair Trading with Acacia Research
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Acacia Research position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Acacia Research will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Acacia Stock
| 0.85 | AZ | A2Z Smart Technologies | PairCorr |
| 0.69 | BA | Boeing Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.61 | AP | Ampco Pittsburgh | PairCorr |
| 0.6 | FA | First Advantage Corp Financial Report 8th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.51 | BW | Babcock Wilcox Enter Financial Report 8th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Acacia Research could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Acacia Research when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Acacia Research - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Acacia Research to buy it.
The correlation of Acacia Research is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Acacia Research moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Acacia Research moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Acacia Research can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Acacia Research. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in estimate. For more detail on how to invest in Acacia Stock please use our How to Invest in Acacia Research guide.You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.
Complementary Tools for Acacia Stock analysis
When running Acacia Research's price analysis, check to measure Acacia Research's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Acacia Research is operating at the current time. Most of Acacia Research's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Acacia Research's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Acacia Research's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Acacia Research to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
| Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
| Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
| Earnings Calls Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges | |
| Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
| Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
| Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency | |
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
| Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
| Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |
Is Acacia Research's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Acacia Research. If investors know Acacia will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Acacia Research listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of Acacia Research is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Acacia that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Acacia Research's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Acacia Research's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Acacia Research's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Acacia Research's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Acacia Research's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Acacia Research is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Acacia Research's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.