Joel Klein - Boston Properties Independent Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
| BXP Stock | USD 61.34 1.14 1.89% |
Chairman
Mr. Joel I. Klein is an Lead Independent Director of Boston Properties, Inc. Mr. Klein is the Chief Policy and Strategy Officer of Oscar Insurance Corporationrationration, a health insurance company. In addition, he was a Director of News Corporation since January 2011 where he was also Executive Vice President, Office of the Chairman of News Corporation and Chief Executive Officer of Amplify, the education division of News Corporationrationration, from January 2011 through December 2015. From 2002 through 2010, Mr. Klein was Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education where he oversaw a system of over 1, 600 schools with 1.1 million students, 136, 000 employees and a 22 billion budget. He was the U.S. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Bertelsmann, Inc. and Chief U.S. Liaison Officer to Bertelsmann AG, a media company, from 2001 to 2002. Mr. Klein also served with the Clinton administration in a number of roles, including Assistant U.S. Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice from 1997 until 2000 and Deputy White House Counsel to President Clinton from 1993 to 1995. Mr. Klein entered the Clinton administration after 20 years of public and private legal work in Washington, D.C since 2019.
| Age | 73 |
| Tenure | 5 years |
| Address | Prudential Center, 800 Boylston Street, Boston, MA, United States, 02199-8103 |
| Phone | 617 236 3300 |
| Web | https://www.bxp.com |
Boston Properties Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0253 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0253 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.0352 %, implying that it generated $0.0352 on every 100 dollars invested. Boston Properties' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Boston Properties manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 04/23/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0.01. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.03. As of 04/23/2024, Non Current Liabilities Other is likely to grow to about 545.8 M, while Total Current Liabilities is likely to drop slightly above 612 M.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | CHAIRMAN Age | ||
| John Kilroy | Kilroy Realty Corp | 75 | |
| Robert Chapman | Cousins Properties Incorporated | 67 | |
| Taylor Glover | Cousins Properties Incorporated | 66 | |
| Temple Sloan | Highwoods Properties | 78 | |
| Gerard Sweeney | Brandywine Realty Trust | 67 | |
| Dale Taysom | Piedmont Office Realty | 72 | |
| Lawrence Gellerstedt | Cousins Properties Incorporated | 61 | |
| Steven Roth | Vornado Realty Trust | 82 | |
| Michael Joyce | Brandywine Realty Trust | 79 | |
| Victor Coleman | Hudson Pacific Properties | 62 | |
| Frank McDowell | Piedmont Office Realty | 72 | |
| Walter DAlessio | Brandywine Realty Trust | 81 | |
| Carlos Evans | Highwoods Properties | 69 | |
| Stephen Green | SL Green Realty | 82 | |
| Joel Marcus | Alexandria Real Estate | 72 | |
| Edward Fritsch | Highwoods Properties | 61 | |
| Dan Emmett | Douglas Emmett | 84 | |
| Anthony Nichols | Brandywine Realty Trust | 78 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.0352 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0253 |
Boston Properties Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Boston Properties' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Boston Properties inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Boston. The board's role is to monitor Boston Properties' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Boston Properties' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Boston Properties' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Helen Han, Vice Relations | ||
| Jake Stroman, Senior Vice President - Leasing, Co-Heads of Washington, DC | ||
| Lori Silverstein, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller | ||
| Mary Kipp, Director | ||
| William Walton, Independent Director | ||
| Alan Patricof, Independent Director | ||
| Joel Klein, Independent Non-Executive Chairman of the Board | ||
| Ivan Seidenberg, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Bruce Duncan, Independent Director | ||
| Laura Sesody, Senior Communications | ||
| Martin Turchin, Independent Director | ||
| Peter Otteni, Senior Vice President - Development, Co-Heads of Washington, DC | ||
| Bryan Koop, Senior Vice President Regional Manager - Boston Office | ||
| Raymond Ritchey, Head of the Washington, D.C. Office, Executive VP and National Director of Acquisitions and Devel. | ||
| John Powers, Senior Vice President Regional Manager - New York Office | ||
| Frank Burt, Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary | ||
| Karen Dykstra, Independent Director | ||
| Douglas Linde, President, Principal Operating Officer, Director, Member of Significant Transactions Committee and Member of Special Transactions Committee | ||
| Jacob Frenkel, Independent Director | ||
| Carol Einiger, Independent Director | ||
| Michael LaBelle, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Treasurer | ||
| Owen Thomas, CEO, Director, Member of Special Transactions Committee and Member of Significant Transactions Committee | ||
| Eric Kevorkian, Chief VP | ||
| Kelly Ayotte, Independent Director | ||
| David Twardock, Independent Director | ||
| Diane Hoskins, Independent Director | ||
| Robert Pester, Senior Vice President Regional Manager - San Francisco Office | ||
| Donna Garesche, Executive Officer | ||
| Matthew Lustig, Independent Director | ||
| Michael Walsh, Senior Vice President Chief Accounting Officer | ||
| Peter Johnston, Senior Vice President Regional Manager - Washington, D.C. Office | ||
| Mortimer Zuckerman, Co-Founder, Non-Executive Chairman and Member of Significant Transactions Committee | ||
| Arista Joyner, Investor Relations Manager |
Boston Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Boston Properties a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.0352 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0253 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.06 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.46 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 27.03 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 157.05 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.21 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 99.79 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 8.06 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 24.48 X |
Pair Trading with Boston Properties
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Boston Properties position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Boston Properties will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Boston Stock
| 0.79 | UE | Urban Edge Properties Financial Report 14th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.63 | INN | Summit Hotel Properties Financial Report 1st of May 2024 | PairCorr |
Moving against Boston Stock
| 0.7 | AHT-PI | Ashford Hospitality Trust | PairCorr |
| 0.69 | AHT-PD | Ashford Hospitality Trust | PairCorr |
| 0.65 | AHT-PF | Ashford Hospitality Trust | PairCorr |
| 0.61 | AHT-PH | Ashford Hospitality Trust | PairCorr |
| 0.58 | AHT-PG | Ashford Hospitality Trust | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Boston Properties could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Boston Properties when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Boston Properties - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Boston Properties to buy it.
The correlation of Boston Properties is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Boston Properties moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Boston Properties moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Boston Properties can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Boston Properties. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in interest. To learn how to invest in Boston Stock, please use our How to Invest in Boston Properties guide.You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.
Complementary Tools for Boston Stock analysis
When running Boston Properties' price analysis, check to measure Boston Properties' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Boston Properties is operating at the current time. Most of Boston Properties' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Boston Properties' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Boston Properties' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Boston Properties to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
| Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
| Crypto Correlations Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins | |
| Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
| Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
| Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
| Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing |
Is Boston Properties' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Boston Properties. If investors know Boston will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Boston Properties listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.02) | Dividend Share 3.92 | Earnings Share 1.21 | Revenue Per Share 20.631 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.348 |
The market value of Boston Properties is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Boston that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Boston Properties' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Boston Properties' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Boston Properties' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Boston Properties' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Boston Properties' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Boston Properties is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Boston Properties' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.