Jon Barfield - CMS Energy Independent Director
CMS Stock | USD 60.28 0.33 0.55% |
Director
Mr. Jon E. Barfield is Independent Director of the Company. He is is president and chief executive officer of LJ Holdings Investment Company LLC, a private investment company. In March 2012, he retired from Bartech Group, Inc. where he served since 1981 as president and from 1995 to March 2012 as chairman and president of this industryleading professional services firm, with headquarters in Southfield, Michigan, delivering talent management, business process outsourcing and managed services provider solutions to Global 1, 000 firms. Bartech manages the daily work assignments for more than 120, 000 associates and more than 4.7 billion in annual procurement for major employers around the world, making Bartech one of the largest talent acquisition and managed service provider firms in the United States. During the past five years, Barfield previously served as a director of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Good Technology Corporationrationration. He was a director of CMS and Consumers since August 2005. Barfield brings to the Board legal knowledge and experience, having practiced corporate and securities law at Sidley Austin LLP. His qualifications to serve as a director stem primarily from his experiences as a senior leader, and his varied service as a director with considerable experience regarding legal risk oversight and risk management, financial reporting, attracting and retaining key talent and related human resources experience, corporate governance, customer service and marketing, and mergers and acquisitions. He served for many years as chairman of the audit committee of the Princeton University Board of Trustees. since 2005.
Age | 69 |
Tenure | 19 years |
Address | One Energy Plaza, Jackson, MI, United States, 49201 |
Phone | 517 788 0550 |
Web | https://www.cmsenergy.com |
CMS Energy Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0273 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0273 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.1027 %, implying that it generated $0.1027 on every 100 dollars invested. CMS Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well CMS Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to gain to 0.03 in 2024. Return On Capital Employed is likely to gain to 0.05 in 2024. At this time, CMS Energy's Return On Tangible Assets are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Intangibles To Total Assets is likely to gain to 0.09 in 2024, whereas Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 17.1 B in 2024.Similar Executives
Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
Denis Cortese | Pinnacle West Capital | 75 | |
Mark Bugher | MGE Energy | 69 | |
Theodore Pound | CenterPoint Energy | 66 | |
Barry Smitherman | CenterPoint Energy | 63 | |
Renae Conley | PNM Resources | 60 | |
Gail McGovern | DTE Energy | 69 | |
Thomas Hyde | Evergy Common Stock | 72 | |
Leslie Biddle | CenterPoint Energy | 54 | |
Leo Mackay | Ameren Corp | 59 | |
David Thomas | DTE Energy | 64 | |
Donald Hintz | Entergy | 73 | |
C Wilder | Evergy Common Stock | 63 | |
James Vandenberghe | DTE Energy | 71 | |
Steven Wilkinson | Entergy | 73 | |
Deborah Dunie | Alliant Energy Corp | 53 | |
Bruce Nordstrom | Pinnacle West Capital | 71 | |
Phillip Smith | CenterPoint Energy | 69 | |
Gayle Jackson | Ameren Corp | 70 | |
Marcia Anderson | MGE Energy | 60 | |
Charles McClure | DTE Energy | 67 | |
Curtis Hastings | MGE Energy | 72 |
Management Performance
Return On Equity | 0.1 | ||||
Return On Asset | 0.0273 |
CMS Energy Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the CMS Energy's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: CMS Energy inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of CMS. The board's role is to monitor CMS Energy's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. CMS Energy's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, CMS Energy's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Melissa Gleespen, Vice President Corporate Secretary | ||
Laura Wright, Independent Director | ||
Angela Thompkins, Vice President and Chief Diversity Officer | ||
William Harvey, Presiding Independent Director | ||
John Sznewajs, Independent Director | ||
Catherine Reynolds, Sr. VP and General Counsel | ||
Catherine Hendrian, Senior Vice President | ||
David Mengebier, Chief Compliance Officer, Sr. VP of Gov.al and Public Affairs and Chief Compliance Officer of Consumers Energy Company | ||
Myrna Soto, Independent Director | ||
Norm Kapala, Vice President | ||
Tamara Faber, VP Officer | ||
Glenn Barba, Vice President Controller, Chief Accounting Officer | ||
LeeRoy Wells, Senior Vice President - Operations | ||
TRAVIS UPHAUS, Director Investor Relations | ||
Jason Shore, Treasurer Relations | ||
Stephen Ewing, Independent Director | ||
Richard Gabrys, Independent Director | ||
Daniel Malone, Sr. VP | ||
John Russell, CEO and President Director, Member of Audit Committee and Member of Fin. Committee | ||
Garrick Rochow, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
Shaun Johnson, Senior Vice President General Counsel | ||
Ronald Tanski, Independent Director | ||
Deborah Butler, Independent Director | ||
Suzanne Shank, Independent Director | ||
Srikanth Maddipati, VP Treasurer | ||
David Joos, Non-Executive Chairman of the Board | ||
Scott McIntosh, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President - Tax, Controller | ||
Shaun JD, Senior Counsel | ||
Patricia Poppe, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
Kurt Darrow, Independent Director | ||
Brian Rich, Senior Vice President - Customer Experience and Technology, Chief Customer Officer | ||
Christine Wisniewski, Vice President - Operations Performance | ||
Philip Lochner, Presiding Independent Director | ||
Brandon Hofmeister, Senior Vice President | ||
Tonya Berry, Senior Vice President - Transformation and Engineering | ||
Jean Brossoit, Senior Vice President | ||
Thomas Webb, CFO and Executive VP | ||
John Butler, Sr. VP | ||
Amanda Wagenschutz, Vice President - People and Culture Operations | ||
Jon Barfield, Independent Director | ||
PHILLIP McANDREWS, Director - Investor Relations | ||
Rejji Hayes, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
Venkat Rao, Senior Vice President | ||
Jim Beechey, VP Officer |
CMS Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is CMS Energy a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Return On Equity | 0.1 | ||||
Return On Asset | 0.0273 | ||||
Profit Margin | 0.12 % | ||||
Operating Margin | 0.23 % | ||||
Current Valuation | 33.9 B | ||||
Shares Outstanding | 298.62 M | ||||
Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.48 % | ||||
Shares Owned By Institutions | 95.98 % | ||||
Number Of Shares Shorted | 11.66 M | ||||
Price To Earning | 20.03 X |
Pair Trading with CMS Energy
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if CMS Energy position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CMS Energy will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with CMS Stock
0.81 | D | Dominion Energy Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
0.62 | ED | Consolidated Edison Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
0.85 | ES | Eversource Energy Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
0.79 | FE | FirstEnergy Earnings Call Tomorrow | PairCorr |
Moving against CMS Stock
0.67 | HE | Hawaiian Electric Financial Report 14th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
0.46 | EDN | Empresa Distribuidora Financial Report 9th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to CMS Energy could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace CMS Energy when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back CMS Energy - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling CMS Energy to buy it.
The correlation of CMS Energy is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as CMS Energy moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if CMS Energy moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for CMS Energy can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in CMS Energy. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in population. For more information on how to buy CMS Stock please use our How to Invest in CMS Energy guide.You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.
Complementary Tools for CMS Stock analysis
When running CMS Energy's price analysis, check to measure CMS Energy's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy CMS Energy is operating at the current time. Most of CMS Energy's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of CMS Energy's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move CMS Energy's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of CMS Energy to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators |
Is CMS Energy's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of CMS Energy. If investors know CMS will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about CMS Energy listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.805 | Dividend Share 1.95 | Earnings Share 3.01 | Revenue Per Share 25.625 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.14) |
The market value of CMS Energy is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of CMS that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of CMS Energy's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is CMS Energy's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because CMS Energy's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect CMS Energy's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between CMS Energy's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if CMS Energy is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, CMS Energy's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.