James Smith - Cardinal Energy Independent Director
| CRLFF Stock | USD 5.23 0.06 1.13% |
Director
Mr. James C. Smith serves as an Independent Director of Cardinal Energy Ltd. Mr. Smith is a Chartered Accountant with over 40 years of experience in public accounting and industry. While Mr. Smith was the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Crestar Energy Inc. from its inception in 1992 until 1998, the company completed an initial public offering, was listed on the TSX and completed several major debt and equity financing transactions. From 1998 to 2006, he was a business consultant to a number of public and private companies operating in the oil and gas industry. Since 2004 he was a director and audit committee chairman for a number of public and private companies. since 2012.
| Tenure | 12 years |
| Phone | 403 234 8681 |
| Web | https://www.cardinalenergy.ca |
Cardinal Energy Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1368 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1368 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3002 %, meaning that it generated $0.3002 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Cardinal Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Cardinal Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Ryan Shay | Crew Energy | 46 | |
| Daniel Farb | MEG Energy Corp | N/A | |
| Robert Rooney | Athabasca Oil Corp | N/A | |
| Jeffrey McCaig | MEG Energy Corp | 65 | |
| Marshall McRae | Athabasca Oil Corp | 59 | |
| Peter Kagan | MEG Energy Corp | 47 | |
| Dean Setoguchi | Tamarack Valley Energy | N/A | |
| David MacKenzie | Tamarack Valley Energy | N/A | |
| Greg Bay | Gear Energy | 58 | |
| Thomas Ebbern | Athabasca Oil Corp | N/A | |
| Henry Sykes | Athabasca Oil Corp | 57 | |
| Stacey McDonald | Birchcliff Energy | 34 | |
| Bryan Begley | Athabasca Oil Corp | N/A | |
| Wazir Seth | Headwater Exploration | 73 | |
| Diana McQueen | MEG Energy Corp | 55 | |
| Paul Haggis | Athabasca Oil Corp | 63 | |
| James McKee | Headwater Exploration | 55 | |
| Debra Gerlach | Birchcliff Energy | 57 | |
| William Klesse | MEG Energy Corp | 71 | |
| Randy Jarock | Pine Cliff Energy | N/A | |
| Robert Spitzer | Tamarack Valley Energy | 48 | |
Management Performance
Cardinal Energy Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Cardinal Energy's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Cardinal Energy inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Cardinal. The board's role is to monitor Cardinal Energy's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Cardinal Energy's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Cardinal Energy's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Connie Shevkenek, Vice President - Engineering | ||
| CMA CPA, Chief Officer | ||
| Shannon Gangl, Co Sec | ||
| Robert Wollmann, VP Exploration | ||
| Laurence Broos, Vice President - Finance | ||
| Douglas Smith, CFO | ||
| David Kelly, Vice President - Saskatchewan | ||
| Dale Orton, Vice President - Capacity | ||
| Tonya Pizzey, Investor Relations | ||
| Craig Kolochuk, VP of Land | ||
| Colin Witwer, Vice President - North | ||
| Jason Laforge, Vice President Central | ||
| James Smith, Independent Director | ||
| David Johnson, Independent Director | ||
| Scott Ratushny, Chairman, CEO and Member of Reserves Committee | ||
| John Brussa, Independent Director | ||
| Shawn Spankeren, CFO | ||
| Gregory Tisdale, Independent Director | ||
| Timothy Hyde, VP of Exploration | ||
| Shane Peet, COO | ||
| Stephanie Sterling, Director |
Cardinal Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right pink sheet is not an easy task. Is Cardinal Energy a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.3 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.14 | |||
| Profit Margin | 0.39 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.40 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 865.29 M | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 155.74 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 22.62 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 4.69 % | |||
| Price To Earning | 2.94 X | |||
| Price To Book | 1.35 X |
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Cardinal Energy in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Cardinal Energy's short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Cardinal Energy options trading.
Pair Trading with Cardinal Energy
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Cardinal Energy position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cardinal Energy will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Cardinal Pink Sheet
| 0.78 | BA | Boeing Financial Report 24th of July 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.65 | MCD | McDonalds Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.53 | INTC | Intel Earnings Call Today | PairCorr |
| 0.41 | JNJ | Johnson Johnson Aggressive Push | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Cardinal Energy could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Cardinal Energy when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Cardinal Energy - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Cardinal Energy to buy it.
The correlation of Cardinal Energy is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Cardinal Energy moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Cardinal Energy moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Cardinal Energy can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Cardinal Energy. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in census. Note that the Cardinal Energy information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Cardinal Energy's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.
Complementary Tools for Cardinal Pink Sheet analysis
When running Cardinal Energy's price analysis, check to measure Cardinal Energy's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Cardinal Energy is operating at the current time. Most of Cardinal Energy's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Cardinal Energy's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Cardinal Energy's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Cardinal Energy to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
| Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
| Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
| Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
| Top Crypto Exchanges Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges | |
| Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges |