Bradford Hu - Citigroup Chief Risk Officer

CTGP34 Stock  BRL 53.80  0.46  0.86%   

Executive

Mr. W. Bradford Hu is Chief Risk Officer of the Company. He has acted as Head of Risk for the Asia Pacific region of the Company. He holds a Masters of Business Administration degree from the Dartmouth College. Moreover, he received a Bachelors degree in Electronics Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Prior to joining Citi, Brad worked at Morgan Stanley for more than 20 years, where he served as CEO of Morgan Stanley Taiwan and held a number of other leadership roles in Firm Management, the Global Equity Division, Global Capital Markets, and Investment Banking. Brad has more than 15 years of experience in Asia, having worked and lived in Hong Kong, Tokyo and Taipei. Brad graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, earning S.B. and S.M. degrees in electrical engineering and computer science with a concentration in economics, and received his M.B.A. with High Distinction from the Amos Tuck School of Business Administration, Dartmouth College, where he was elected Edward Tuck Scholar. since 2013.
Age 54
Tenure 11 years
Professional MarksMBA
Phone212 559 1000
Webhttps://www.citigroup.com

Citigroup Management Efficiency

Citigroup's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Citigroup manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.
The company has accumulated 271.61 B in total debt. Debt can assist Citigroup until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Citigroup's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Citigroup sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Citigroup to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Citigroup's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.

Similar Executives

Showing other executives

EXECUTIVE Age

Andrea SmithBank of America
51
Stephen CutlerJPMorgan Chase Co
53
Peter ScherJPMorgan Chase Co
55
Christian BluhmUBS Group AG
54
Jennifer PiepszakJPMorgan Chase Co
52
Nicole GilesJPMorgan Chase Co
44
Lori BeerJPMorgan Chase Co
55
Robin LeopoldJPMorgan Chase Co
53
Markus RonnerUBS Group AG
58
Geoffrey GreenerBank of America
53
Markus BaumannUBS Group AG
55
Stacey FriedmanJPMorgan Chase Co
54
Sheri BronsteinBank of America
49
Caroline StewartUBS Group AG
N/A
Markus DiethelmUBS Group AG
60
Ashley BaconJPMorgan Chase Co
48
David LeitchBank of America
57
John DonnellyJPMorgan Chase Co
59
Citigroup Inc., a diversified financial services holding company, provides various financial products and services for consumers, corporations, governments, and institutions in North America, Latin America, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. Citigroup Inc. was founded in 1812 and is headquartered in New York, New York. CITIGROUP DRN operates under Banks - Global classification in Brazil and is traded on Sao Paolo Stock Exchange. It employs 200000 people. Citigroup (CTGP34) is traded on Sao Paulo Exchange in Brazil and employs 240,000 people.

Management Performance

Citigroup Leadership Team

Elected by the shareholders, the Citigroup's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Citigroup inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Citigroup. The board's role is to monitor Citigroup's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Citigroup's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Citigroup's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Eugene McQuade, Director
Jane Fraser, CEO - Latin America
Franz Humer, Independent Director
Francisco Aristeguieta, CEO, Asia Pacific
Diana Taylor, Independent Director
Michael Murray, Head of Human Resources
Michael ONeill, Independent Chairman of the Board
Manish Kohli, Global Head - Payments and Receivables
John Dugan, Independent Director
Michael Whitaker, Head of Operations and Technology
Paco Ybarra, Chief Group
James Forese, President CEO - Institutional Clients Group
James Cowles, CEO - Europe, Middle East & Africa
Peter Henry, Independent Director
Bradford Hu, Chief Risk Officer
David Bailin, Chief Investments
Leslie Ireland, Independent Director
Sanford Weill, Chairman Advisor
Mark Mason, Chief Officer
Ellen Costello, Independent Director
Don Callahan, Head - Operations and Technology
Michael Corbat, CEO, Director
Rohan Weerasinghe, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Deborah Wright, Independent Director
Johnbull Okpara, Chief Controller
John Gerspach, CFO
Sara Wechter, Chief Risk Officer
Peter Babej, Chief AsiaPacific
Manolo Falco, CoHead Banking
Raja Akram, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller
William Mills, CEO - North America
Renee James, Independent Director
Duncan Hennes, Independent Director
Anthony Santomero, Independent Director
Barbara Desoer, CEO - Citibank, N.A.
James Turley, Independent Director
Gary Reiner, Independent Director
Lew Jacobs, Independent Director
Ernesto Leon, Independent Director
Engineer Cant, Chief America
Stephen Bird, CEO, Global Consumer Banking

Citigroup Stock Performance Indicators

The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Citigroup a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Citigroup in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Citigroup's short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Citigroup options trading.

Pair Trading with Citigroup

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Citigroup will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Moving together with Citigroup Stock

  0.94JPMC34 JPMorgan ChasePairCorr
  0.97BOAC34 Bank of AmericaPairCorr
  0.66UBSG34 UBS Group AGPairCorr
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Citigroup could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Citigroup when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Citigroup - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Citigroup to buy it.
The correlation of Citigroup is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Citigroup moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Citigroup moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Citigroup can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching
When determining whether Citigroup offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Citigroup's financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Citigroup Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Citigroup Stock:
Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Citigroup. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in nation.
For information on how to trade Citigroup Stock refer to our How to Trade Citigroup Stock guide.
Note that the Citigroup information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Citigroup's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.

Complementary Tools for Citigroup Stock analysis

When running Citigroup's price analysis, check to measure Citigroup's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Citigroup is operating at the current time. Most of Citigroup's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Citigroup's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Citigroup's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Citigroup to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Please note, there is a significant difference between Citigroup's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Citigroup is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Citigroup's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.