Stephen Joyce - Dine Brands Chief Executive Officer, Director

DIN Stock  USD 45.15  0.93  2.10%   

CEO

Mr. Stephen P. Joyce was appointed as Chief Executive Officer, Director of the Company effective September 12, 2017. Mr. Joyce served as president and chief executive officer of Choice Hotels International, Inc., a publiclytraded lodging franchisor, from 2008 to September 2017 and as a director from 2008 to September 2017. From 1982 to 2008, Mr. Joyce was with Marriott International, Inc., where he attained the role of executive vice president, global developmentowner and franchise services, in addition to holding other leadership positions. Mr. Joyces qualifications to sit on the Corporationrationrations Board of Directors include his experience in senior management of public companies, including service as president, chief executive officer and chief operating officer, and his experience on the boards of directors of public and private companies and notforprofit organizations. since 2017.
Age 59
Tenure 7 years
Address 10 West Walnut Street, Pasadena, CA, United States, 91103
Phone818 240 6055
Webhttps://www.dinebrands.com
Joyce holds a Bachelor Degree in Commerce from the University of Virginia and has completed graduate work at Cornell University, Wharton Business School and the Aspen Institute.

Dine Brands Management Efficiency

The company has Return on Asset of 0.0652 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0652 of profit. This is way below average. Dine Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Dine Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 23rd of April 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.11, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.14. At this time, Dine Brands' Other Current Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 23rd of April 2024, Deferred Long Term Asset Charges is likely to grow to about 57.6 M, while Total Assets are likely to drop about 1.6 B.
The company has 1.59 B in debt with debt to equity (D/E) ratio of 558.1, demonstrating that the company may be unable to create cash to meet all of its financial commitments. Dine Brands Global has a current ratio of 1.28, demonstrating that it is not liquid enough and may have problems paying out its financial commitments when the payables are due. Debt can assist Dine Brands until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Dine Brands' shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Dine Brands Global sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Dine to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Dine Brands' use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.

Similar Executives

Found 5 records

CEO Age

John MillerDennys Corp
62
Kelli ValadeDennys Corp
54
Wyman RobertsBrinker International
65
Gregory TrojanBJs Restaurants
58
Kevin HochmanBrinker International
49
Dine Brands Global, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, franchises, operates, and rents full-service restaurants in the United States and internationally. Dine Brands Global, Inc. was founded in 1958 and is headquartered in Glendale, California. Dineequity operates under Restaurants classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 513 people. Dine Brands Global (DIN) is traded on New York Stock Exchange in USA. It is located in 10 West Walnut Street, Pasadena, CA, United States, 91103 and employs 596 people. Dine Brands is listed under Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure category by Fama And French industry classification.

Management Performance

Dine Brands Global Leadership Team

Elected by the shareholders, the Dine Brands' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Dine Brands inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Dine. The board's role is to monitor Dine Brands' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Dine Brands' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Dine Brands' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Christine Son, Senior Vice President Legal, General Counsel, Company Secretary
Richard Dahl, Independent Chairman of the Board
Lilian Tomovich, Independent Director
Gregory Bever, VP Officer
Jay Johns, President - IHOP Business Unit
Sarah CannonFoster, Chief Officer
Kieran Donahue, Chief IHOP
Darren Rebelez, President IHOP Business Unit
Tony Moralejo, President Development
Michael Hyter, Independent Director
Brett Levy, Vice Treasury
Larry Kay, Independent Director
Vance Chang, Chief Financial Officer
Thien Ho, Executive Communications
Douglas Pasquale, Independent Director
Susan Nelson, Vice Affairs
Stephen Joyce, Chief Executive Officer, Director
Allison Hall, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
Charles Scaccia, Senior Operations
Caroline Nahas, Independent Director
John Cywinski, President of Applebee's Business Unit
Howard Berk, Independent Director
Thomas Song, Chief Financial Officer
Thomas Emrey, CFO
John Jakubek, Sr. VP of HR
Ken Diptee, Executive Relations
Susan Collyns, Independent Director
Greggory Kalvin, Senior Vice President Corporate Controller
Scott Gladstone, Chief International
John Peyton, Chief Executive Officer, Director
Justin Skelton, Chief Officer
Julia Stewart, Chairman and CEO
Gilbert Ray, Independent Director
Daniel Brestle, Independent Director
Martha Poulter, Independent Director
Patrick Rose, Independent Director
Bryan Adel, Senior Vice President - Legal, General Counsel, Secretary
Daniel Olmo, President of International

Dine Stock Performance Indicators

The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Dine Brands a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.

Pair Trading with Dine Brands

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Moving together with Dine Stock

  0.83DRI Darden Restaurants Financial Report 27th of June 2024 PairCorr
  0.68FUN Cedar Fair LP Financial Report 2nd of May 2024 PairCorr

Moving against Dine Stock

  0.48LE Lands End Financial Report 6th of June 2024 PairCorr
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Dine Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Dine Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Dine Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Dine Brands Global to buy it.
The correlation of Dine Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Dine Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Dine Brands Global moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Dine Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching
When determining whether Dine Brands Global offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Dine Brands' financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Dine Brands Global Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Dine Brands Global Stock:
Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Dine Brands Global. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product.
You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Complementary Tools for Dine Stock analysis

When running Dine Brands' price analysis, check to measure Dine Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Dine Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Dine Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Dine Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Dine Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Dine Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Is Dine Brands' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Dine Brands. If investors know Dine will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Dine Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
1.978
Dividend Share
2.04
Earnings Share
6.22
Revenue Per Share
54.557
Quarterly Revenue Growth
(0.01)
The market value of Dine Brands Global is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Dine that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Dine Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Dine Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Dine Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Dine Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Dine Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Dine Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Dine Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.