Carolee Lee - Designer Brands Independent Director

Director

Ms. Carolee Lee Friedlander is Independent Director of the Company. Ms. Lee serves as a founder and CEO of AccessCircles, a byinvitation global community of women providing connectivity, knowledge and information in the areas of health and wellness, financial expertise and life balance. Ms. Lee has held that position since August 2004. From July 2001 to August 2004, Ms. Lee served as Senior Vice President of Retail Brand Alliance, Inc., and as President and Chief Executive Officer of Carolee Designs, Inc., a subsidiary of Retail Brand Alliance. Prior to that, Ms. Lee served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Carolee Designs, a fashion accessory company she founded in 1973 and sold to Retail Brand Alliance in July 2001. Ms. Lees long term service as a CEO of a retail company brings strong leadership experience and indepth knowledge of marketing and merchandising to our Board. since 2005.
Age 75
Tenure 19 years
Phone614 237-7100
Webwww.designerbrands.com
Lee has held that position since August 2004. From July 2001 to August 2004, Ms. Lee served as Senior Vice President of Retail Brand Alliance, Inc., and as President and Chief Executive Officer of Carolee Designs, Inc., a subsidiary of Retail Brand Alliance. Prior to that, Ms. Lee served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Carolee Designs, a fashion accessory company she founded in 1973 and sold to Retail Brand Alliance in July 2001.

Designer Brands Management Efficiency

The company has Return on Asset of 0.0808 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0808 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.14 %, implying that it generated $0.14 on every 100 dollars invested. Designer Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Designer Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.
The company has 160 M in debt with debt to equity (D/E) ratio of 19.2, demonstrating that the company may be unable to create cash to meet all of its financial commitments. Designer Brands has a current ratio of 2.02, demonstrating that it is liquid and is capable to disburse its financial commitments when the payables are due. Debt can assist Designer Brands until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Designer Brands' shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Designer Brands sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Designer to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Designer Brands' use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.

Similar Executives

Showing other executives

DIRECTOR Age

Elisabeth FisherValhi Inc
59
Leslie KilgorePinterest
54
Thomas FitzpatrickIridium Communications
66
Alvin KrongardIridium Communications
81
Karen SheriffBCE Inc
63
Hayden McIlroyValhi Inc
78
Barry AllenBCE Inc
70
Thomas CanfieldIridium Communications
62
Henrik SchliemannIridium Communications
53
Paul WeissBCE Inc
71
Robert DexterBCE Inc
69
Parker RushIridium Communications
58
Margaret McGlynnAir Products and
59
Eric OlsonIridium Communications
66
Edward MonserAir Products and
70
Calin RovinescuBCE Inc
65
Jeffrey JordanPinterest
61
Sheila MurrayBCE Inc
65
Charles CogutAir Products and
73
Katherine LeeBCE Inc
57
Carole TaylorBCE Inc
68
DSW Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a branded footwear and accessories retailer in the United States. DSW Inc. was founded in 1917 and is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. DSW operates under Apparel Stores classification in USA and is traded on BATS Exchange. It employs 16100 people. Designer Brands (DSW) is traded on NYSE MKT Exchange in USA and employs 16,100 people.

Management Performance

Designer Brands Leadership Team

Elected by the shareholders, the Designer Brands' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Designer Brands inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Designer. The board's role is to monitor Designer Brands' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Designer Brands' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Designer Brands' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Carrie McDermott, COO and Executive VP
Henry Aaron, Independent Director
Philip Miller, Independent Director
Joseph Schottenstein, Director
Drew Domecq, Senior Vice President CIO
Allan Tanenbaum, Independent Director
Jay Schottenstein, Executive Chairman
Harris Mustafa, Chief Supply Chain Officer and Executive VP
Michele Love, COO - Designer Shoe Warehouse, Executive Vice President
Elaine Eisenman, Independent Director
Carolee Lee, Independent Director
Joanne Zaiac, Independent Director
Carolee Friedlander, Independent Director
Roger Rawlins, CEO and Inside Director
Michael MacDonald, CEO and President and Director
Joanna Lau, Independent Director
Ekta SinghBushell, Independent Director
Simon Nankervis, Executive Vice President , Chief Commercial Officer
Christina Cheng, IR Contact Officer
Jared Poff, Interim CFO, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
William Jordan, Chief Admin. Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Executive VP, General Counsel and Secretary
Deborah Ferree, Vice Chairman, Chief Merchandising Officer
Harvey Sonnenberg, Independent Director
Peter Cobb, Independent Director
Mary Meixelsperger, CFO and Sr. VP

Designer Stock Performance Indicators

The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Designer Brands a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Designer Brands in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Designer Brands' short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Designer Brands options trading.

Pair Trading with Designer Brands

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Designer Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Microsoft could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Microsoft when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Microsoft - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Microsoft to buy it.
The correlation of Microsoft is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Microsoft moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Microsoft moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Microsoft can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching
Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in state.
You can also try the Portfolio Suggestion module to get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios.

Other Consideration for investing in Designer Stock

If you are still planning to invest in Designer Brands check if it may still be traded through OTC markets such as Pink Sheets or OTC Bulletin Board. You may also purchase it directly from the company, but this is not always possible and may require contacting the company directly. Please note that delisted stocks are often considered to be more risky investments, as they are no longer subject to the same regulatory and reporting requirements as listed stocks. Therefore, it is essential to carefully research the Designer Brands' history and understand the potential risks before investing.
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum