Jennifer Allerton - Iron Mountain Independent Director
IRM Stock | USD 78.19 1.59 2.08% |
Director
Ms. Jennifer Allerton is Independent Director of the Company September 2014. Ms. Allerton has more than 40 years of information technology experience, most recently as chief information officer at F. Hoffman la Roche, or Roche, in Switzerland with responsibility for information technology strategy and operations for the pharmaceutical division and all group information technology operations from June 2002 to July 2012. Prior to Roche, Ms. Allerton served from May 1999 to June 2002 as Technology Director at Barclaycard in the United Kingdom with responsibility for fraud operations and information technology. Ms. Allerton serves on the board of directors of Sandvik AB, a global engineering company, and Aveva plc, an engineering design and information management solutions firm for the plant, power and marine industries. From March 2017 to December 2017, Ms. Allerton served as a nonexecutive director of Paysafe Group plc, a provider of digital payments and transactionrelated solutions to businesses and consumers, or Paysafe, and was a member of Paysafe Audit and Nomination Committees. From June 2013 to September 2016, Ms. Allerton served as a nonexecutive director of Oxford Instruments plc, a leading provider of high technology tools and systems for research and industry, and was a member of its Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committees since 2014.
Age | 70 |
Tenure | 10 years |
Address | 85 New Hampshire Avenue, Portsmouth, NH, United States, 03801 |
Phone | 617 535 4766 |
Web | https://www.ironmountain.com |
Iron Mountain Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0413 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0413 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.3339 %, implying that it generated $0.3339 on every 100 dollars invested. Iron Mountain's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Iron Mountain manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 25th of April 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.02. Also, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to 0.09. At this time, Iron Mountain's Total Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 25th of April 2024, Non Current Assets Total is likely to grow to about 16.5 B, while Other Current Assets are likely to drop about 150.6 M.Similar Executives
Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
Duncan Cocroft | SBA Communications Corp | 74 | |
Charles ONeil | Hannon Armstrong Sustainable | 67 | |
William Luby | Equinix | 58 | |
Robert McKenzie | Crown Castle | 76 | |
Thomas Bartlett | Equinix | 59 | |
Hogan Preusse | Digital Realty Trust | 49 | |
Mary Chan | SBA Communications Corp | 55 | |
Cindy Christy | Crown Castle | 55 | |
John Roberts | Digital Realty Trust | 53 | |
Carolyn Katz | American Tower Corp | 53 | |
Steven Osgood | Hannon Armstrong Sustainable | 63 | |
Christopher Paisley | Equinix | 65 | |
Richard Osborne | Hannon Armstrong Sustainable | 69 | |
Teresa Brenner | Hannon Armstrong Sustainable | 56 | |
Earl Shanks | Gaming Leisure Properties | 61 | |
Wesley Edens | Gaming Leisure Properties | 53 | |
Anthony Melone | Crown Castle | 63 | |
Mark Cirilli | Hannon Armstrong Sustainable | 46 | |
David Sharbutt | American Tower Corp | 70 | |
William LaPerch | Digital Realty Trust | 64 | |
Lee Hogan | Crown Castle | 75 |
Management Performance
Return On Equity | 0.33 | ||||
Return On Asset | 0.0413 |
Iron Mountain rporated Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Iron Mountain's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Iron Mountain inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Iron. The board's role is to monitor Iron Mountain's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Iron Mountain's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Iron Mountain's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Peter Allen, Senior Vice President General Manager- Data Management | ||
Stuart Brown, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
Robin Matlock, Independent Director | ||
Gillian Tiltman, Senior Relations | ||
John Tomovcsik, Executive Vice President General Manager - Records and Information Management | ||
Edward Greene, Chief Human Resource Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
Kent Dauten, Lead Director, Independent Director | ||
Ernest Cloutier, Executive Vice President, General Manager - Global Records and Information Management | ||
Greg CA, Chief VP | ||
Theodore Maclean, Executive Vice President Chief Marketing Officer | ||
Ellen Hall, Global Development | ||
William Meaney, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
Fidelma Russo, Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer | ||
Garry Watzke, Senior President | ||
Theodore Antenucci, Independent Director | ||
Jennifer Allerton, Independent Director | ||
Paul Deninger, Independent Director | ||
Doyle Simons, Independent Director | ||
Patrick Keddy, executive vice president and general manager, North America and Western Europe | ||
Eileen Sweeney, Senior Vice President General Manager | ||
Daniel Borges, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer | ||
PerKristian Halvorsen, Independent Director | ||
Monte Ford, Independent Director | ||
Pamela Arway, Independent Director | ||
Alfred Verrecchia, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
Walter Rakowich, Independent Director | ||
Deborah Marson, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary | ||
Edward Bicks, Senior Vice President Chief Strategy officer | ||
Greer Aviv, Senior Vice President IR Contact Officer | ||
BSc MEng, CEO Pres | ||
Neil Chatfield, Independent Director | ||
Melissa Marsden, Senior Vice President Investor Relations | ||
Clarke Bailey, Independent Director | ||
Mark Kidd, Executive Vice President General Manager, data centers | ||
Barry Hytinen, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
Deirdre Evens, Executive Vice President, General Manager - Records and Information Management, North America | ||
Wendy Murdock, Independent Director | ||
Greg McIntosh, Executive Vice President, General Manager, Global Records and Information Management. |
Iron Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Iron Mountain a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Return On Equity | 0.33 | ||||
Return On Asset | 0.0413 | ||||
Profit Margin | 0.03 % | ||||
Operating Margin | 0.21 % | ||||
Current Valuation | 36.91 B | ||||
Shares Outstanding | 293.1 M | ||||
Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.87 % | ||||
Shares Owned By Institutions | 81.10 % | ||||
Number Of Shares Shorted | 9.8 M | ||||
Price To Earning | 31.99 X |
Iron Mountain Investors Sentiment
The influence of Iron Mountain's investor sentiment on the probability of its price appreciation or decline could be a good factor in your decision-making process regarding taking a position in Iron. The overall investor sentiment generally increases the direction of a stock movement in a one-year investment horizon. However, the impact of investor sentiment on the entire stock market does not have solid backing from leading economists and market statisticians.
Investor biases related to Iron Mountain's public news can be used to forecast risks associated with an investment in Iron. The trend in average sentiment can be used to explain how an investor holding Iron can time the market purely based on public headlines and social activities around Iron Mountain Incorporated. Please note that most equities that are difficult to arbitrage are affected by market sentiment the most.
Iron Mountain's market sentiment shows the aggregated news analyzed to detect positive and negative mentions from the text and comments. The data is normalized to provide daily scores for Iron Mountain's and other traded tickers. The bigger the bubble, the more accurate is the estimated score. Higher bars for a given day show more participation in the average Iron Mountain's news discussions. The higher the estimated score, the more favorable is the investor's outlook on Iron Mountain.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Iron Mountain in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Iron Mountain's short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Iron Mountain options trading.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Iron Mountain Incorporated. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in metropolitan statistical area. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.
Complementary Tools for Iron Stock analysis
When running Iron Mountain's price analysis, check to measure Iron Mountain's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Iron Mountain is operating at the current time. Most of Iron Mountain's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Iron Mountain's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Iron Mountain's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Iron Mountain to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
Odds Of Bankruptcy Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years | |
Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
Global Markets Map Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes | |
Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency |
Is Iron Mountain's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Iron Mountain. If investors know Iron will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Iron Mountain listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.76) | Dividend Share 2.506 | Earnings Share 0.63 | Revenue Per Share 18.772 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.11 |
The market value of Iron Mountain rporated is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Iron that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Iron Mountain's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Iron Mountain's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Iron Mountain's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Iron Mountain's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Iron Mountain's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Iron Mountain is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Iron Mountain's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.