Lisa Disbrow - Mercury Systems Director
| MRCY Stock | USD 28.48 1.04 3.79% |
Director
Ms. Lisa S. Disbrow serves as Independent Director of the Company. Ms. Disbrow retired as the Under Secretary of the Air Force in 2017. She was responsible for the affairs of the Department of the Air Force, including organizing, training, equipping, and providing for the welfare of approximately 660, 000 active duty, Guard, Reserve and civilian Airmen and their families, worldwide. She oversaw the Air Forces annual budget of more than 132 billion and directed strategy and policy development, risk management, weapons acquisition, technology investments and human resource management across a global enterprise. Prior to the confirmation of the current Secretary of the Air Force in May 2017, Ms. Disbrow served as the Acting Secretary of the Air Force. In 2014, Ms. Disbrow was confirmed by the U.S. Senate as the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Financial Management and Comptroller, the principal senior official on all financial matters. Ms. Disbrow was commissioned into the U.S. Air Force in 1985 and her 23 years of uniformed service culminated in 2008 when she retired as a Colonel from the Air Force Reserve. She was a director of Perspecta Inc., a publiclytraded U.S. government services provider, since 2018 since 2017.
| Age | 54 |
| Tenure | 7 years |
| Address | 50 Minuteman Road, Andover, MA, United States, 01810 |
| Phone | 978 256 1300 |
| Web | https://www.mrcy.com |
Mercury Systems Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.0214) % which means that it has lost $0.0214 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of (0.056) %, meaning that it created substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. Mercury Systems' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Mercury Systems manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to rise to -0.03 in 2024. Return On Capital Employed is likely to rise to -0.01 in 2024. At this time, Mercury Systems' Total Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Non Current Assets Total is likely to rise to about 1.8 B in 2024, whereas Non Currrent Assets Other are likely to drop slightly above 4.3 M in 2024.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Cecil Haney | General Dynamics | 65 | |
| Allen Kozinski | Curtiss Wright | 75 | |
| Kim Foster | Hexcel | 68 | |
| Marilyn Minus | Hexcel | 42 | |
| Robert Rivet | Curtiss Wright | 67 | |
| Karl Heyden | Huntington Ingalls Industries | 79 | |
| David Joyce | The Boeing | 64 | |
| Kenneth Duberstein | The Boeing | 73 | |
| Edward Liddy | The Boeing | 72 | |
| William Sihler | Curtiss Wright | 76 | |
| James Ellis | Lockheed Martin | 73 | |
| Mike Zafirovski | The Boeing | 64 | |
| William Osborn | General Dynamics | 72 | |
| Tracy McKibben | Huntington Ingalls Industries | 51 | |
| Daniel Akerson | Lockheed Martin | 72 | |
| David Burritt | Lockheed Martin | 65 | |
| Anastasia Kelly | Huntington Ingalls Industries | 68 | |
| Bernard Harris | Raytheon Technologies Corp | 64 | |
| Albert Smith | Curtiss Wright | 70 | |
| Stuart Thorn | Curtiss Wright | 57 | |
| S Fuller | Curtiss Wright | 60 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | -0.056 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0214 |
Mercury Systems Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Mercury Systems' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Mercury Systems inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Mercury. The board's role is to monitor Mercury Systems' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Mercury Systems' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Mercury Systems' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Lisa Disbrow, Director | ||
| Charles IV, Executive COO | ||
| James Bass, Independent Director | ||
| David Farnsworth, CFO VP | ||
| Steve Ratner, Executive Officer | ||
| Vincent Vitto, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Douglas Munro, VP Officer | ||
| Charles Speicher, Chief Accounting Officer, VP, Controller and Assistant Treasurer | ||
| Robert McGrail, Director Communications | ||
| Michael Daniels, Independent Director | ||
| George Muellner, Independent Director | ||
| Gerald Haines, Senior Vice President - Corporate Development, Chief Legal Officer, Secretary | ||
| Brian Perry, President of Mercury Defense Systems | ||
| Stephanie Georges, Executive Officer | ||
| William Ballhaus, CEO President | ||
| Stuart Kupinsky, Executive Officer | ||
| Michelle McCarthy, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller | ||
| Allen Couture, Executive Excellence | ||
| Christopher Cambria, Senior Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | ||
| Jeffrey Eason, VP Officer | ||
| Mark Aslett, CEO and President and Director | ||
| Didier Thibaud, COO and Executive VP | ||
| Mark Newman, Director | ||
| Barry Nearhos, Director | ||
| Thomas Huber, Ex Officer | ||
| William OBrien, Independent Director | ||
| William Conley, Chief Officer | ||
| Michael Ruppert, CFO, Executive Vice President Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer | ||
| Mary Krakauer, Director | ||
| James Stevison, Ex Division |
Mercury Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Mercury Systems a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | -0.056 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0214 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.1) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.12 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.79 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 59.37 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 3.24 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 96.76 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 3.75 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 34.06 X |
Mercury Systems Investors Sentiment
The influence of Mercury Systems' investor sentiment on the probability of its price appreciation or decline could be a good factor in your decision-making process regarding taking a position in Mercury. The overall investor sentiment generally increases the direction of a stock movement in a one-year investment horizon. However, the impact of investor sentiment on the entire stock market does not have solid backing from leading economists and market statisticians.
Investor biases related to Mercury Systems' public news can be used to forecast risks associated with an investment in Mercury. The trend in average sentiment can be used to explain how an investor holding Mercury can time the market purely based on public headlines and social activities around Mercury Systems. Please note that most equities that are difficult to arbitrage are affected by market sentiment the most.
Mercury Systems' market sentiment shows the aggregated news analyzed to detect positive and negative mentions from the text and comments. The data is normalized to provide daily scores for Mercury Systems' and other traded tickers. The bigger the bubble, the more accurate is the estimated score. Higher bars for a given day show more participation in the average Mercury Systems' news discussions. The higher the estimated score, the more favorable is the investor's outlook on Mercury Systems.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Mercury Systems in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Mercury Systems' short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Mercury Systems options trading.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Mercury Systems. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators. For more information on how to buy Mercury Stock please use our How to Invest in Mercury Systems guide.Note that the Mercury Systems information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Mercury Systems' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.
Complementary Tools for Mercury Stock analysis
When running Mercury Systems' price analysis, check to measure Mercury Systems' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Mercury Systems is operating at the current time. Most of Mercury Systems' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Mercury Systems' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Mercury Systems' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Mercury Systems to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
| Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
| Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
| Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
| Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios |
Is Mercury Systems' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Mercury Systems. If investors know Mercury will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Mercury Systems listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.35) | Earnings Share (1.49) | Revenue Per Share 15.664 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.154 | Return On Assets (0.02) |
The market value of Mercury Systems is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Mercury that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Mercury Systems' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Mercury Systems' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Mercury Systems' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Mercury Systems' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Mercury Systems' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Mercury Systems is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Mercury Systems' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.