Helmut Panke - Microsoft Independent Director

MSFT Stock  USD 413.64  8.26  1.96%   

Director

Dr. Helmut Gunter Wilhelm Panke, Ph.D. is an Independent Director of the Company. He served as Chairman of the Board of Management of BMW Bayerische Motoren Werke AG from 2002 through 2006. From 1999 to 2002, he served as a member of the Board of Management for Finance. From 1996 to 1999, Dr. Panke was a member of the Board of Management for Human Resources and Information Technology. In his role as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BMW Holding Corporationration from 1993 to 1996, he was responsible for the companys North American activities. He joined BMW in 1982. Qualifications Dr. Panke brings a global perspective to the Board. His almost 25year career at BMW culminated in leading the company from 2002 to 2006, giving him experience as chief executive officer of a major international public corporation. In addition, his extensive rsum at BMW includes leadership roles in a variety of business disciplines including finance, information technology, worldwide human resources, and operations since 2003.
Age 71
Tenure 21 years
Address One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, United States, 98052-6399
Phone425 882 8080
Webhttps://www.microsoft.com
Panke understands product manufacturing processes, how to manage a company through business cycles and intense competition, and how to build and sustain a globally recognized and respected brand. His service on the boards of other prominent international companies enhances his ability to contribute insights on achieving business success in a diverse range of geographies, economic conditions, and competitive environments.

Microsoft Management Efficiency

The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1519 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1519 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.3917 %, meaning that it created $0.3917 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Microsoft's Return On Capital Employed is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Assets is likely to gain to 0.20 in 2024, whereas Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.22 in 2024. At this time, Microsoft's Total Current Liabilities is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to gain to about 497.5 B in 2024, whereas Change To Liabilities is likely to drop slightly above 6.9 B in 2024.
The company currently holds 59.97 B in liabilities with Debt to Equity (D/E) ratio of 0.44, which is about average as compared to similar companies. Microsoft has a current ratio of 1.8, which is within standard range for the sector. Debt can assist Microsoft until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Microsoft's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Microsoft sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Microsoft to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Microsoft's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.

Similar Executives

Showing other executives

DIRECTOR Age

Patrick GradyOkta Inc
34
Edward BarnholtAdobe Systems Incorporated
74
Dheeraj PandeyAdobe Systems Incorporated
43
Earvin JohnsonBlock Inc
55
Benjamin HorowitzOkta Inc
50
Naveen RaoBlock Inc
Mary MeekerBlock Inc
60
Jeffrey ParksNutanix
36
John McAdamNutanix
67
Laura DesmondAdobe Systems Incorporated
52
Robert BurgessAdobe Systems Incorporated
59
Shellye ArchambeauOkta Inc
55
Rebecca SaegerOkta Inc
63
Jim McKelveyBlock Inc
50
Michael CannonAdobe Systems Incorporated
61
Ruth SimmonsBlock Inc
73
Randall GaruttiBlock Inc
45
Robert SedgewickAdobe Systems Incorporated
67
Daniel RosensweigAdobe Systems Incorporated
56
Ravi MhatreNutanix
49
James DaleyAdobe Systems Incorporated
76
Microsoft Corporation develops, licenses, and supports software, services, devices, and solutions worldwide. Microsoft Corporation was founded in 1975 and is headquartered in Redmond, Washington. Microsoft Corp operates under SoftwareInfrastructure classification in the United States and is traded on NASDAQ Exchange. It employs 221000 people. Microsoft (MSFT) is traded on NASDAQ Exchange in USA. It is located in One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, United States, 98052-6399 and employs 221,000 people. Microsoft is listed under Systems Software category by Fama And French industry classification.

Management Performance

Microsoft Leadership Team

Elected by the shareholders, the Microsoft's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Microsoft inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Microsoft. The board's role is to monitor Microsoft's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Microsoft's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Microsoft's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Bradford LCA, President Chairman
Hossein Nowbar, Chief Officer
Charles Scharf, Director
Sean Ventura, Vice President - Information Security, Chief Information Security Officer
Christopher Young, Strategy Development
Takeshi Numoto, Executive Officer
Chris Suh, General Manager - Investor Relations
Helmut Panke, Independent Director
JeanPhilippe Courtois, Executive Vice President and President - Microsoft Global Sales, Marketing and Operations
Penny Pritzker, Independent Director
Judson Althoff, Executive Officer
Sandra Peterson, Independent Director
Frank Shaw, Corp Communications
Teri ListStoll, Independent Director
Charles Noski, Independent Director
Christopher Capossela, Executive Vice President Chief Marketing Officer
Margaret Johnson, Executive Vice President - Business Development
John Thompson, Independent Chairman of the Board
Amy Hood, CFO and Executive VP
William Gates, Founder and Technology Advisor, Director
Mason Morfit, Independent Director
Padmasree Warrior, Independent Director
Bradford Smith, Executive Vice President General Counsel, Secretary
Brett Iversen, Vice Relations
Hugh Johnston, Director
Arne Sorenson, Independent Director
Satya Nadella, CEO and Director
Kevin Scott, CTO
Keith Esq, Deputy VP
Keith Lorizio, Vice President - North America Sales
James Scott, Executive CTO
Brian Turner, COO
Kathleen Hogan, Executive Vice President - Human Resources
Alice Jolla, Corporate Officer
John Stanton, Director
Reid Hoffman, Director
Ifeanyi Amah, CTO

Microsoft Stock Performance Indicators

The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Microsoft a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.

Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!

The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.

Try AI Portfolio Architect
When determining whether Microsoft is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if Microsoft Stock is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Microsoft Stock. Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Microsoft Stock:
Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Microsoft. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in census.
For more information on how to buy Microsoft Stock please use our How to Invest in Microsoft guide.
Note that the Microsoft information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Microsoft's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Complementary Tools for Microsoft Stock analysis

When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Is Microsoft's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Microsoft. If investors know Microsoft will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Microsoft listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
0.332
Dividend Share
2.86
Earnings Share
11.04
Revenue Per Share
30.612
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.176
The market value of Microsoft is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Microsoft that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Microsoft's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Microsoft's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Microsoft's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Microsoft's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Microsoft's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Microsoft is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Microsoft's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.