Correlation Between Bristol-Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bristol-Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bristol-Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bristol Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs BDC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bristol-Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bristol-Myers Squibb with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bristol-Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Bristol-Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Bristol-Myers and Goldman is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bristol Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs BDC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs BDC and Bristol-Myers Squibb is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bristol Myers Squibb are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs BDC has no effect on the direction of Bristol-Myers Squibb i.e., Bristol-Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bristol-Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs

If you would invest  1,489  in Goldman Sachs BDC on January 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  61.00  from holding Goldman Sachs BDC or generate 4.1% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy0.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bristol Myers Squibb  vs.  Goldman Sachs BDC

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bristol Myers Squibb 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bristol Myers Squibb has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable primary indicators, Bristol-Myers Squibb is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
Goldman Sachs BDC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs BDC are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound fundamental drivers, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bristol-Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bristol-Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bristol-Myers Squibb position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Bristol Myers Squibb and Goldman Sachs BDC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets