This module allows you to analyze existing cross correlation between Citigroup Inc and Sprint Corporation. You can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Sprint and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Sprint. See also your portfolio center
. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup
Citigroup Inc vs Sprint Corp.
Taking into account the 30 trading days horizon, Citigroup Inc is expected to generate 0.43 times more return on investment than Sprint. However, Citigroup Inc is 2.32 times less risky than Sprint. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Sprint Corporation is currently generating about -0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest 7,466 in Citigroup Inc on December 20, 2017 and sell it today you would earn a total of 273 from holding Citigroup Inc or generate 3.66% return on investment over 30 days.
|Time Period||1 Month [change]|
Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup Inc and Sprint Corp. in the same portfolio assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sprint and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup Inc are associated (or correlated) with Sprint. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sprint has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e. Citigroup and Sprint go up and down completely randomly.
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup Inc are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 30 days.
Over the last 30 days Sprint Corporation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions.