Correlation Between Mfs Emerging and Stone Harbor

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mfs Emerging and Stone Harbor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mfs Emerging and Stone Harbor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mfs Emerging Markets and Stone Harbor Local, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mfs Emerging and Stone Harbor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mfs Emerging with a short position of Stone Harbor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mfs Emerging and Stone Harbor.

Diversification Opportunities for Mfs Emerging and Stone Harbor

0.72
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mfs and Stone is 0.72. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mfs Emerging Markets and Stone Harbor Local in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Stone Harbor Local and Mfs Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mfs Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Stone Harbor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Stone Harbor Local has no effect on the direction of Mfs Emerging i.e., Mfs Emerging and Stone Harbor go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mfs Emerging and Stone Harbor

Assuming the 90 days horizon Mfs Emerging is expected to generate 1.1 times less return on investment than Stone Harbor. In addition to that, Mfs Emerging is 1.02 times more volatile than Stone Harbor Local. It trades about 0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Stone Harbor Local is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  743.00  in Stone Harbor Local on January 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  53.00  from holding Stone Harbor Local or generate 7.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mfs Emerging Markets  vs.  Stone Harbor Local

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mfs Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mfs Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Mfs Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Stone Harbor Local 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Stone Harbor Local has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Stone Harbor is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Mfs Emerging and Stone Harbor Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mfs Emerging and Stone Harbor

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mfs Emerging and Stone Harbor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mfs Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Stone Harbor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Stone Harbor will offset losses from the drop in Stone Harbor's long position.
The idea behind Mfs Emerging Markets and Stone Harbor Local pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio